The Rams' asking price for the No. 2 pick should be obvious

I don't get why people are suggesting that the Rams trade the second pick for lower picks in the draft. That makes no sense. Why would the Rams want picks that are WORSE than the one they already have. It makes me wonder if John Shaw and Jay Zygmunt are still running the show when people suggest things like that.

Its obvious that the only pick more valuable than the second pick is THE FIRST PICK!

Duh!

The only problem is that the Colts won't trade the first pick because they want Andrew Luck, who was already determined to be this year's first pick back in December (and given that the Rams have Sam Bradford, they obviously don't want that pick!)

So, what's the solution?

Again, it should be obvious.

The Rams should trade the second pick in this year's draft for the FIRST pick in next year's draft. That would be an upgrade.

Too bad they don't call me for advice when they're confused by simple issue like this.

--B

Nearly as funny as a crippled child.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fargo Ram Fan

Nearly as funny as a crippled child.

---

You laugh at crippled children?

That's horrible!

(Must be pretty boring in Fargo 'dis time ah-year, yew betcha!)

But Bernie, if we are going to trade for the first pick in next year's draft, who are we going to trade with? It's quite possible that if we trade the #2 pick, for that one, WE might have that pick, and how do we trade with ourselves?

wow... I sure have missed you Bernie.