Ravens CB McCalister and S Will Demps F/As?

*RamsFan16* · #1 (**permalink**) -21-01-2006

Ravens | McAlister might not be with team for 2006 season
Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:05:15 -0800

Mike Preston, of the Baltimore Sun, reports Baltimore Ravens head coach Brian Billick recently warned team officials that CB Chris McAlister might not be with the team for the 2006 season. McAlister has five years left on his contract worth $36 million. He received a $10 million signing bonus in October of 2004 and another $7.5 million during the spring of 2005.

Ravens | Demps not likely to return to team
Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:04:55 -0800

Mike Preston, of the Baltimore Sun, reports Baltimore Ravens S Will Demps will not likely be re-signed by the team for the 2006 season.

Now I don't know about you guys but I would love to have either of these guys. Should we take a look at them if they are Free Agents?

*stefer_footballdude1* · #2 (**permalink**) -21-01-2006

i'd rather have demps, cause last year our saftys were kinda soft in pass coverage, and not so much our cb's concedering we wer playing our 3-6 stringers...

**Nick** · #3 (**permalink**) -21-01-2006

I'll pass on Demps. There's a reason the Ravens are not resigning him despite needing another safety to play next to Reed.

*Rip32* · #4 (**permalink**) -23-01-2006

So how is McCallister going to be a FA if he has 5 years left on his contract,hows that gonna work?
I would love to get him if he was available

*RamsFan16* · #5 (**permalink**) -23-01-2006

Because of his huge contract.

**Nick** · #6 (**permalink**) -23-01-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rip32

So how is McCallister going to be a FA if he has 5 years left on his contract,hows that gonna work?
I would love to get him if he was available

Possible cap casualty, but I don't think it'll come to that.

*SFCRamFan* · #7 (**permalink**) -27-01-2006

We probably can't afford either one. We have so much youth in our defensive backfield already. We have a great youth movement. Let's see who develops.

*general counsel* · #8 (**permalink**) -27-01-2006

Mcalister is a true stud at corner. Of course, i would love to have him, but i am not prepared to pay champ bailey type money or close to it to get him. For the same cash we can have pickett and at least one other good starter on defense.

ramming speed to all

general counsel

*Hodgins* · #9 (**permalink**) -01-02-2006

nate clements is better and will certainly be much cheaper, im not a mcallister fan

let some sucker take demps, who is awful in coverage, well pass and draft michael huff

*RamsFan16* · #10 (**permalink**) -02-02-2006

No Clements isn't better. Clements is overrated.