JavaScript must be enabled to use this chat software. Round 2

Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Round 2

  1. #1
    itsguud's Avatar
    itsguud is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Rep Power

    Round 2

    I was just just watching through some film on Defensive players and there is a good pissiblity that when the ticker hits us in the 2nd, we could have a S on the board as BPA... would anyone take that. I would. I know we have other needs, but S is something we definitly need, and although I don't like CHavous I think he would be a good vet. to bring in a younger guy and have him help get into the game.

    Just a thought.

  2. #2
    Nick_Weasel's Avatar
    Nick_Weasel is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Rep Power

    Re: Round 2

    If a safety were the BPA at #33 I'd take him in a heartbeat. With as many holes as we have, I think it's silly when people sometimes say "ok, round 2 we take best WR available and then in round 3 we take best OL available."

    There are plenty of positions we should consider in round 2, and safety is definitely one of them. So yeah, I'm with you - if safety is BPA, let's do it.

  3. #3
    smizzhfx Guest

    Re: Round 2

    If Kenny Phillips is there: Absolutely.
    Josh Barrett: Most likely, depending on who else slid out of the 1st.

    It all depends on who the BPA is, and whether or not it coincides with a need... You can't really say whether or not you would take a player or not at a certain position until you see who else is on the board.

  4. #4
    keith m. klink Guest

    Re: Round 2

    let it snow baby , would love the bpa to be a safety to pair with O.J.

  5. #5
    Mooselini Guest

    Re: Round 2

    I want Barrett in a Rams uniform. But we have so many needs, I don't know who we need priority.

  6. #6
    TekeRam's Avatar
    TekeRam is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Lexington, Kentucky, United States
    Rep Power

    Re: Round 2

    It all depends upon FA and who slides in round one. If we get an ok OL in FA(obviously not big signing, but good enough), and we go DE in round one, and especially if none of the OT's like Otah slip, I would be very much in favor of going in this direction. I think our top needs are DE, OT and SS, with WR close behind that, and so, in this weak safety class, if a top prospect falls to us at 33, we definitely need to take him and maybe hedge our bets that there'll be OL depth still there in round 3.

Similar Threads

  1. Wagoners mail bag
    By RamWraith in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: -01-28-2008, 12:21 PM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: -03-28-2007, 04:24 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: -01-05-2007, 12:22 PM
  4. Inside Slant
    By RamWraith in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: -05-01-2006, 08:04 AM
  5. NFL Draft Countdown's Nov. 11 Mock Draft
    By Nick in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: -11-15-2005, 07:36 PM


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts