Say the Rams take Long or Gholston at #2

[tomahawk247]

does that completely count out taking a DE later in the draft? or would you take another one if the value is good? I would be open to taking another DE as Hall and Little are old and the Rams do like to rotate their linemen

the only thing is that we have a lot of other positions that could use youth/improvement

[Rambos]

Little DE
Adam NT
Dorsey UT
L. Jackson DE


I think if we go Dorsey we still need a DE, Hall and Little both are getting old. DE in the second and WR in the third.

[jkramsfan]

Little DE
Adam NT
Dorsey UT
L. Jackson DE


I think if we go Dorsey we still need a DE, Hall and Little both are getting old. DE in the second and WR in the third.

I think you need to go WR in the second and DE in the 3rd, our DE's are old but at least we have some,we really need to get a very good Bruce replacement.

[harrydog]

I wouldn't take another DE this year if we take Long or Gholston.
WR, OT, DB, and LB are also needs that should be addressed first. We can go DE again next year if there is a need.

[eauclare]

Little DE
Adam NT
Dorsey UT
L. Jackson DE


I think if we go Dorsey we still need a DE, Hall and Little both are getting old. DE in the second and WR in the third.

I have advocated this for a long time. The front four you mentioned would be a force with Ryan rotating in the lineup.

People say we are set at DT, but where? You have AC and Ryan. Glover is 34 yrs old and Wrotten has been a bust.

I would even go Cb/OL in round 4. Maybe even LB if value is there.

There are too many holes to fill in one year. This will take a couple drafts and FA periods.

If our line can stay healthy, this team can compete buy doing the above.

[Rambos]

If we take Dorsey AC has to move inside not out and we need to draft a DE that can contribute.

[Mooselini]

If we take Chris Long or Gholston this year, we probably won't stress out about a new DE this draft. Next draft however, we may end up snagging another one to replace Little or Hall, whichever retires.