Just vote Yes or No to Michael Vick coming to St. Louis next season. We will see where the clan stands.
:helmet:
Printable View
Just vote Yes or No to Michael Vick coming to St. Louis next season. We will see where the clan stands.
:helmet:
If we can get him for cheap, hells yeah. And we get rid of bulger and boller.
My vote is yes only because with a offensive line that has been better toward helping our rushing game that pass protection and maybe paying for Vicks salary wouldn't cost us as much WHY NOT? Keep Null ADIOS Boller!!
Sure get rid of Bulger after he takes some big shots from a lack of protection! Throw him under the bus like spags did to incognito, who had his teammate's back! Were are your loyalties!!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by thermobee
Keep the kid hawry
If they were to do this, I would organize the Billy Devaney opposition party the next day.Quote:
Originally Posted by thermobee
-----------------------------------------
I haven't seen many Rams practices in my life, but of the few I have seen, I do remember Incognito attacking the very players he "has the back of" in one.
I voted no. Even when Vick was in his prime he could not lead the Falcons to back to back winning seasons.
Yes he can move around and throw a deep ball. But overall he is not a very good QB in my book. And the Rams do not need a quick fix next year to get into the playoffs we are more than a QB away from that, we are in the middle of a long term rebuilding process.
What do we have to lose? I mean seriously can things get any worse?? Plus I would love to use him in madden lol
I'd be willing to bet that the older one is, the ledd likely one is to want Vick on the team.
Me? I'm old enough that I remember how he was 90% flash, 10% talent. The Rams don't need this - we need solid, steady, productive talent.
What has "VICK" done this year to make anyone think he is the future of this franchise?? I much rather draft a young QB in the 2nd or 3rd round and keep Bulger for another year or 2.
I rather have Bulger everyday of the week and twice on Sundays.
Go Rams
Let's see...Quote:
Originally Posted by Ahmedrams81
Well, if the Rams sign Vick and, as a result (1) feel like they can wait until later in the draft to get a QB of the future, and (2) pass on other veteran QBs who would do a better job... then I'd say they would have lost a lot.
I don't think he fix the west coast O you need a QB who is high in accuracy that he is not. No
Well, we could use a change-of-pace back to play behind Jackson. Give him a half a dozen carries or so.
Hmm? What's that? Bring him in as a.....QB? Not as a RB? Well then, no, of course not. We're going to need our QB to pass the ball.
Ya sure i would take a qb that can pass for 3000 yards and 20 td's in a season.
Wait...Vick has never done that? Not even once in his career? Never mind then
I believe we seriously need to move forward at the Qb position. If we can get Vick and draft a Qb in the second round I would be very happy.Quote:
Originally Posted by LA Rammer
Look, we aren't going to be good next year either. We may be better, but that's not saying much. It looks like the Rams are going to draft a QB in either Round 1 or 2 but the QBs coming out in the draft are not going to be ready. There are no Sanchezs or Staffords in this draft. So why not? Bulger is too expensive for what he delivers. Boller can't cut it. Null isn't ready. Won't be ready next year either. So why not Vick? He could be the one year stop gap we need.