View Poll Results: Everybody One Clap?

Voters
9. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, bring him in!

    5 55.56%
  • No thanks.

    4 44.44%
Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    THOLTFAN81's Avatar
    THOLTFAN81 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    1,938
    Rep Power
    25

    Spags Doesn't Rule Out Rams Pursuing Moss

    Per Rotoworld:

    Speaking at the Combine Thursday, coach Steve Spagnuolo didn't rule out the possibility that the Rams might pursue free agent Randy Moss.
    The Rams strongly considered claiming Moss when he was waived by the Vikings last season. "Anybody that’s been in his system becomes a little bit attractive," said Spags. The "system" Spagnuolo referred to is new OC Josh McDaniels'. It sounds like McDaniels has the go ahead to pursue Moss if he so chooses. And if it's approved by GM Billy Devaney, of course
    I wouldn't mind this at all quite frankly. He was nothing but good in Tennessee, even taking on a blocking role w barely any stats. Didn't really complain.

    Plus this makes us much less handcuffed if Julio and AJ are gone. Much less pressure on Devaney and Spags. Can pick up a solid defender at the 14 spot.

    Given it was with a New England team that was much more experienced but Randy Moss did break multiple records with McDaniels.

    Who wants em? I say bring em in with a reasonable 1-2 year deal.
    Last edited by THOLTFAN81; -02-24-2011 at 12:42 PM.


  2. #2
    39thebeast's Avatar
    39thebeast is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    conecticut
    Posts
    2,740
    Rep Power
    38

    Re: Spags Doesn't Rule Out Rams Pursuing Moss

    I would kick the tires he had his best year in his prestigious career under McDanels. If he tries he can be a dominate player hopefull McD can motivate him.

  3. #3
    richtree's Avatar
    richtree is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    2,122
    Rep Power
    17

    Re: Spags Doesn't Rule Out Rams Pursuing Moss

    He isn't that good anymore. He was a speed guy that lost a step or 2 and didn't bulk up during the last few years.

    Other than working with DX I can't see a positive for bringing him in next season. If you put him on the best teams he is only a 500 and 5 TD guy.....we have plenty of them....no thx

  4. #4
    C-Mob 71's Avatar
    C-Mob 71 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    S. Illinois
    Posts
    1,506
    Rep Power
    45

    Re: Spags Doesn't Rule Out Rams Pursuing Moss

    I wanted Moss thirteen years ago, I wanted him seven years ago, I wanted him five years ago, I wanted him in the middle of last season, and yeah, I still want him now.

    Would be interesting to see how much sway McD has over bringing him in. Sure he isn't the same player as he was four years ago, but he is a veteran who knows his system, not too many of those floating around.

    Straight Cash Homey!

  5. #5
    HUbison's Avatar
    HUbison is offline Superbowl MVP
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Kentucky
    Age
    40
    Posts
    13,555
    Rep Power
    144

    Re: Spags Doesn't Rule Out Rams Pursuing Moss

    If he would show an ounce of maturity and produce like he did as recently as '09, I'd be fine with it. But his '10 production was practically non-existent though playing a full season, and I've yet to see any maturity out of this 34-year-old.
    "Before the gates of excellence the high gods have placed sweat; long is the road thereto and rough and steep at first; but when the heights are reached, then there is ease, though grievously hard in the winning." --- Hesiod

  6. #6
    Ramblin` Ram's Avatar
    Ramblin` Ram is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Nation of Rams
    Age
    38
    Posts
    2,401
    Rep Power
    54

    Re: Spags Doesn't Rule Out Rams Pursuing Moss

    i think i`ll save my energy for the "Plaxico "Polo Leg" Burress released:Rams should pursue him" thread..that will surely come in the near future.

  7. #7
    THOLTFAN81's Avatar
    THOLTFAN81 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    1,938
    Rep Power
    25

    Re: Spags Doesn't Rule Out Rams Pursuing Moss

    I wish there was a way we were guaranteed one of AJ Green or Julio, because I want one of them to really grow up with Sam in this league. Seeing as how that is as far a guarantee as anything, I really would be happy with the signing of Moss. I still think we would need to address wide receiver in round 2 though.

  8. #8
    THOLTFAN81's Avatar
    THOLTFAN81 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    1,938
    Rep Power
    25

    Re: Spags Doesn't Rule Out Rams Pursuing Moss

    Quote Originally Posted by Ramblin` Ram View Post
    i think i`ll save my energy for the "Plaxico "Polo Leg" Burress released:Rams should pursue him" thread..that will surely come in the near future.
    no thanks, i really dont want him.

  9. #9
    BarronWade's Avatar
    BarronWade is online now Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    1,429
    Rep Power
    23

    Re: Spags Doesn't Rule Out Rams Pursuing Moss

    First off even if Jones and Green are gone we are not hand-cuffed because there are still some good tall WRs left in Baldwin, Little, Hankerson that will be available in the 2nd.

    I say no on Moss. He is not going to accept a 1 year deal because itz the story of his career. He will be good for a team for the 1st year or 2 than just give up. Last year he gave up before he was even claimed by the titans. Also we really dont need him to provide poison in out locker room. We have some young wide receivers we dont need Moss to teach them how become divas.

  10. #10
    Ramblin` Ram's Avatar
    Ramblin` Ram is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Nation of Rams
    Age
    38
    Posts
    2,401
    Rep Power
    54

    Re: Spags Doesn't Rule Out Rams Pursuing Moss

    Holtfan, you are not the only one who starts threads promoting old players with poor character.

  11. #11
    THOLTFAN81's Avatar
    THOLTFAN81 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    1,938
    Rep Power
    25

    Re: Spags Doesn't Rule Out Rams Pursuing Moss

    Quote Originally Posted by Ramblin` Ram View Post
    Holtfan, you are not the only one who starts threads promoting old players with poor character.
    just passing along what I read, not like I started this out of the blue.

    Randy Moss was the furthest thing from my mind to be honest until I read this.

  12. #12
    ZiaRam is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Las Cruces, New Mexico, United States
    Age
    34
    Posts
    1,530
    Rep Power
    20

    Re: Spags Doesn't Rule Out Rams Pursuing Moss

    you know I'd without a doubt Agree with Moss over TO and the Plax...
    but not preferrably.
    Would prefer a younger more solid experienced guy.... Jackson or Rice even Holmes or Edwards.

  13. #13
    npow81's Avatar
    npow81 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    ID
    Posts
    193
    Rep Power
    9

    Re: Spags Doesn't Rule Out Rams Pursuing Moss

    Nothing but good in Tennessee? He may have been quiet off the field, but he was also very quiet on the field while in Tennessee, and Minnesota for that matter.

Similar Threads

  1. The Rams Finally Have A Plan (The Three Year Rule)
    By AvengerRam in forum Articles by AvengerRam
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: -05-05-2009, 02:29 AM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: -09-07-2006, 10:51 PM
  3. Rams Learn Rule Changes
    By RamDez in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: -08-13-2006, 04:45 PM
  4. Don't rule out the Rams taking a QB in Round 1
    By RamsFan16 in forum DRAFT & FA
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: -04-21-2006, 07:03 PM
  5. Replies: 9
    Last Post: -08-18-2004, 06:03 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •