Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 18 of 18

Thread: T.O To the STL?

  1. #16
    makersncoke's Avatar
    makersncoke is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    mo
    Age
    46
    Posts
    658
    Rep Power
    21

    Re: T.O To the STL?

    The guy's just bad for the locker room, no matter what he can still do on the field. We should have signed him last year, he wants the ball on every play and since we had no one to throw to it could have been a win-win situation for all parties.

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  2. #17
    rammiser's Avatar
    rammiser is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
    Age
    41
    Posts
    2,010
    Rep Power
    58

    Re: T.O To the STL?

    I would say maybe if we needed a big time wr to get us to the Superbowl. However this team is a lot farther away than a star wr to get to the promised land. I don't think he's washed up yet because of the way he takes care of himself but the Rams don't need him.
    Just Fix It

  3. #18
    Keenum's Avatar
    Keenum is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Alabama
    Age
    26
    Posts
    2,865
    Rep Power
    27

    Re: T.O To the STL?

    I think T.O. can still play, and play well, but we REALLY don't need anybody in here than could disrupt any team chemistry... especially with where we are at right now and with the youth of this team.
    If we still had Bruce, Holt, or another stud veteran on offense, I would be more likely to say yes, but for now... really not sure on this one.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •