Results 1 to 5 of 5
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By MauiRam

Thread: Watkins is intriguing possibility for Rams

  1. #1
    MauiRam's Avatar
    MauiRam is offline Pro Bowl Ram
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Maui, Hi.
    Age
    70
    Posts
    4,800
    Rep Power
    79

    Watkins is intriguing possibility for Rams

    3 hours ago • By Jim Thomas

    For the Rams and the wide receiver position, when is enough enough? The answer to that question Thursday will help shape the team’s 2014 draft, and really the short-term future of the organization.

    Over the past two drafts, the Rams have invested heavily in the position. Four picks total have been expended on wide receivers in that span — one apiece in each of the first four rounds.

    Last season, the Rams even traded up for West Virginia’s Tavon Austin in the first round, making him the first skill-position player taken in the 2013 draft (at No. 8 overall).

    If Houston, as is now expected, takes South Carolina defensive end Jadeveon Clowney at No. 1, the Rams would have the opportunity to take the top wide receiver in the draft two years in a row.

    “This guy (Watkins) and Austin?” asked NFL analyst Russ Lande, a former Rams scout. “Holy smokes if you get them rolling.”

    Watkins and Austin is a nice daydream for Rams Nation. But all indications are that a Sammy Watkins-Tavon Austin tandem will not materialize.

    “The reality is, Austin is gonna be a dynamic guy if they can basically say: ‘We’re just gonna get him the ball. Let’s figure a way out,’ “ said Lande, who is a football analyst for multiple media outlets while doubling as college scouting director of the CFL’s Montreal Alouettes.

    “I don’t think (Brian) Quick is ever gonna be that guy; it doesn’t look like it,” Lande continued. “We don’t know about (Stedman) Bailey, although I like him a lot. He’s got potential.

    “But this guy, Watkins, is a game-changing player to me. I think if you look at the Rams, one of their biggest issues is they don’t have playmakers.

    “The only thing that would concern me about taking Watkins high is that Austin is a dynamic playmaker, and their coaches couldn’t figure out how to use him properly. So are they gonna know how to use this kid properly?”

    That concern aside, Lande has basically stated the pro-Watkins argument.

    And despite all the signals from Rams Park about standing pat at wide receiver — including some public statements by coach Jeff Fisher and general manager Les Snead — it’s believed there are some in the building who would like to take Watkins.

    And if you put the truth serum into members of the personnel department, some — maybe most — would say Watkins is a more talented wide receiver than anyone on the current roster. That’s no slam at Austin, because he’s kind of in a separate category, more playmaker and “loose play” specialist than pure polished pass-catcher.

    So why walk away from Watkins at No. 2?

    For one, maybe the wide receiver corps is better than given credit for and a little more patience is needed. There’s just one season to judge Austin and Bailey (class of 2013), and only two years to judge Quick and Chris Givens (class of ‘12.)

    Future Hall of Famer Marvin Harrison, for example, didn’t have a 1,000-yard receiving season until 1999 — his fourth year in the league, with Indianapolis.

    One veteran NFL scout, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said the current Rams receiver corps is better as a group than his team’s group. (His team, by the way, is not picking in the top 10.)

    “With Bailey and Austin, you probably have enough (talent), if they are established guys,” Lande said. “But at this point you don’t know.”

    Also to be factored in is the fact that backup quarterback (Kellen Clemens) was throwing to them for nine of the 16 games last season because of Sam Bradford’s knee injury. For all the good things Clemens did, the wide receiver starts were deflated to a degree with him at QB.

    So it goes back to the question of how much do you invest in the position, particularly with a run-first offense, a defensive-oriented head coach and needs at several other positions.

    A three-time all-American at Clemson, Watkins is the schools’ career leader in receptions (240) and receptions yards (3,391) over those three seasons. He had 103 catches and 12 touchdowns last year alone.

    Watkins also returned 60 kickoffs over his career (scoring once) and had 52 carries for 339 yards (and a touchdown).

    “For me, I think I can do just about anything on the field from wide receiver, to running back, to slot,” Watkins said. “I can make plays all over the field. What I love doing is dominating defenses. I think that’s what I bring to the game, and I think that’s going to (carry) over to the NFL.”

    Watkins plays bigger than his size (6 feet 1, 211 pounds), getting low and running almost like a running back after the catch. He has excellent hands, plucking the ball out of the air. And there’s some toughness to his game as well. He’ll go over the middle, beat press coverage, and block.

    He’s not totally clean off the field, getting suspended for two games in 2012 for a misdemeanor marijuana charge. After a pre-trial intervention, the arrest was expunged from his record.

    But other than that, there isn’t much not to like.

    “He has the potential to be an elite, premier guy very quickly,” Lande said.


  2. #2
    bruce4life's Avatar
    bruce4life is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Hemet/San Diego CA
    Age
    34
    Posts
    2,789
    Rep Power
    31

    Re: Watkins is intriguing possibility for Rams

    Would love for the rams to select watkins but we have so much talent in our current group, i feel they just need some more time to develop.

  3. #3
    mde8352gorams's Avatar
    mde8352gorams is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Age
    61
    Posts
    1,683
    Rep Power
    19

    Re: Watkins is intriguing possibility for Rams

    The article overlooks Kenny Britt. I think here was a strategy in signing him and if he delivers, we'll have a pretty solid group regardless of whether there is a bonafide #1 or not. Disappointed to read the assessment of Brian Quick. Hope that is proven wrong. Also think Chris Givens will rededicate himself this season making him more of a downfield threat.

    Go Rams!

  4. #4
    MauiRam's Avatar
    MauiRam is offline Pro Bowl Ram
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Maui, Hi.
    Age
    70
    Posts
    4,800
    Rep Power
    79

    Re: Watkins is intriguing possibility for Rams

    Quote Originally Posted by bruce4life View Post
    Would love for the rams to select watkins but we have so much talent in our current group, i feel they just need some more time to develop.
    Anyone hear Mark Schlereth on Sedano and Stink radio show a couple of days ago? Stink was waxing poetic over Sammy's abilities. Stink said with full conviction that Watkins is the best wr to come down the pipe since Megatron. Went on to say how tough he is, and that he is strong enough to play running back in this league and rush for 1400 yards. Tough, fights for the catch, great blocker, on and on. Maybe his daughter is dating the guy - or - maybe he's right. Watkins is one of the top 5 players on most everyone's board. As long as we get one of them I'll be placated.
    laram0 likes this.

  5. #5
    turbofargo's Avatar
    turbofargo is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    California
    Posts
    404
    Rep Power
    7

    Re: Watkins is intriguing possibility for Rams

    I wouldn't be upset with the pick, probably go ALRIGHT, but I would be somewhat surprised. I know some people have him as a big contender for us if we stay at 2, but I just don't feel it coming from headquarters. Almost get a sense of he'll be a hell of a good player for a team, just not our team from Fisher and Snead.

Similar Threads

  1. Bernie Bytes: 5 Most Intriguing Rams
    By r8rh8rmike in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: -07-19-2013, 06:08 PM
  2. Rams 2011 schedule strength intriguing!?
    By FestusRam in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: -01-26-2011, 03:21 PM
  3. Bernie: Intriguing Subplots For Rams Vs. Chiefs
    By r8rh8rmike in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: -12-19-2010, 01:24 AM
  4. Replies: 35
    Last Post: -06-20-2008, 01:29 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •