Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Country Guest

    What about DT Adam Carriker

    What do you guys think about drafting DE Adam Carriker and playing him at DT as they did at the Senior Bowl. The guy is 6'6" and nearly 300lbs.


  2. #2
    general counsel's Avatar
    general counsel is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    atlanta, georgia
    Age
    52
    Posts
    5,706
    Rep Power
    84

    Re: What about DT Adam Carriker

    I have no interest in drafting a guy with the #13 pick and having him switch positions. The draft is enough of a crapshoot without getting into the position conversion issues. Just my opinion, i am not saying it cant work, but from my point of view it adds risk.

    ramming speed to all

    general counsel


  3. #3
    AvengerRam's Avatar
    AvengerRam is offline Moderator Emeritus
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Longwood, Florida, United States
    Age
    46
    Posts
    19,051
    Rep Power
    172

    Re: What about DT Adam Carriker

    Draft him to play DE. That's where he played in college, and he is certainly athletic enough to do so at the next level.

  4. #4
    ENN107 Guest

    Re: What about DT Adam Carriker

    I wouldn't be upset with the pick because he can play anywhere on the line and his flexibilty will allow him to see the field sooner than most rookies. Maybe he can develop into a Richard Seymore type...one can only hope.

  5. #5
    Drew Guest

    Re: What about DT Adam Carriker

    if we were to move to a 3-4 base D next year id say Carriker would be a great pick for us as i think he would be best suited to playing one of the edges in a 3 man D-line but as a DE in a 4-3 i would prefer either a FA or a draft pick with better pass rushing qualities!

  6. #6
    Nick's Avatar
    Nick is offline Superbowl MVP
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Morgantown, WV
    Age
    32
    Posts
    19,876
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: What about DT Adam Carriker

    I really see no reason to take Carriker and then try to move him inside to play tackle, so I would have to say no at this point. If we want a tackle, then just draft a tackle.

  7. #7
    tomahawk247's Avatar
    tomahawk247 is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Essex, England
    Age
    28
    Posts
    4,927
    Rep Power
    57

    Re: What about DT Adam Carriker

    we want to be bigger on the DL, so if we did draft Carriker he would most definitely play as a DE for us

  8. #8
    MASSIVE Guest

    Cool Re: What about DT Adam Carriker

    Play him at DE on 1ST and 2ND downs and then slide him over to DT on 3RD down. Helps our run and our pass defense!

  9. #9
    HUbison's Avatar
    HUbison is offline Superbowl MVP
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Kentucky
    Age
    40
    Posts
    13,709
    Rep Power
    145

    Re: What about DT Adam Carriker

    Just to clarify, Carriker DID play DE in a 4-3 defense, so to play 4-3 for us would not be a switch at all. And actually, he played NT at times when the huskers went to a 3-4. Granted, this alignment lent itself more to Carriker stunting from the inside than it did a typical NT position, but he has spent time both inside and outside.

    Having said all that, I would have no problem with drafting him to play opposite Little on the line. A 290 DE with freakish strength and solid penetration potential would go a long way to taking the double teams off Little.
    "Before the gates of excellence the high gods have placed sweat; long is the road thereto and rough and steep at first; but when the heights are reached, then there is ease, though grievously hard in the winning." --- Hesiod

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •