what grade would you give the front office?

[realchamp11]

With day one over what grade do you give spags and the front office on the first two picks??

[lostsoul]

We got the best OT and the best MLB. A+

[Shan the Ram Man]

I gave the Rams a A so far in the Draft.
I just hope the players drafted become starters and have a great year.
The only problem 2 players won't turn Rams around.
More beef up front on D.

[r8rh8rmike]

A+ without a doubt. IMO we got the best OT in the draft and quite possibly the best all around MLB. I am so stoked.

[thoey]

Actually, I voted before seeing that you had limited it to just the day 1 of the draft. Overall, the off season has been an A+. Being a Curryite, I give day one itself an A. Hindsight being 20/20, we could have got Curry and an OT. Don't get me wrong, I am not complaining. They didn't know the cards would fall that way, so, all in all, I am very satisfied. But the total package of free agency and the draft? I am really ecstatic and looking forward to training camp and making some noise this season.

[39thebeast]

I'm against grading a draft they day of the draft IMO it doesn't really make sense, because they haven't done anything in the NFL. I think the best way to grade a draft is 3 years after the pick is made, because you have a much better feal on players and how they have developed.

[Keenum]

I don't think I could have been more satisfied with our picks. Considering everything, I would give the front office an A for day 1.

[dgr828]

I'm against grading a draft they day of the draft IMO it doesn't really make sense, because they haven't done anything in the NFL. I think the best way to grade a draft is 3 years after the pick is made, because you have a much better feal on players and how they have developed.

Good point 39! We certainly can't yet give the Rams an "A" without seeing these players play a down.
Good picks by the Rams none the less.
For the sake of the poll, I gave the Rams a "B".

[Azul e Oro]

I'm against grading a draft they day of the draft IMO it doesn't really make sense, because they haven't done anything in the NFL. I think the best way to grade a draft is 3 years after the pick is made, because you have a much better feal on players and how they have developed.

I think most of us agree with that. But I also think this thread still has a valid point in representing how we feel about the picks rather than claiming we've won anything or predicting HOF careers. Or, as some overwrought Clannie claimed, the whole draft was a failure after the first pick!

I voted an A. The merits of both players are well-documented and the need was clear.

I'm certainly gonna have some fun ribbing my Raider friends....only the smaller ones,though....

[Fortuninerhater]

An A so far. Two very solid picks. Just wish we had more picks to manuever with.

[39thebeast]

For the Sake of argument filling your 2 biggest needs with the 2 highest rated players at their position is worth an A. It will be interesting to see if we go d-line or WR

[r8rh8rmike]

For the Sake of argument filling your 2 biggest needs with the 2 highest rated players at their position is worth an A. It will be interesting to see if we go d-line or WR

There you go. Good response. You put things in perspective. Rep coming your way.

[#39 Fan]

So far, it's gotta be an A

[Mooselini]

A+ hands down!

We filled our two biggest needs in the top two rounds. Come on, what can go wrong? We got arguably the best OT in the draft, and one of the hottest MLB's.

[punahou]

Im the only C as of now.

Im not going to be the rah rah fan boy.

Maualuga > Lauranitis.

Character issue, Im not privy to whatever this is about, but an extremely aggressive, hard hitter like Ray just seems to be a better fit than a majority of tackles made 4 yards across the line of scrimmage tackling machine.

Have we learned nothing when we passed on Polomalu? I guess its true that J. Shaw is still in the draft room.

Flame away--

A disappointed again Ram.