Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 35 of 35
Like Tree15Likes

Thread: Why the Rams would take Chance Warmack at 16

  1. #31
    sosa39rams's Avatar
    sosa39rams is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Hamilton, On
    Posts
    5,501
    Rep Power
    43

    Re: Why the Rams would take Chance Warmack at 16

    Quote Originally Posted by Fortuninerhater View Post
    Regardless of what you might say about their O-line, most would tell you it has been the defense that's carried them the last two years, with the offense finally starting to show some signs of life this past year. And some may argue that even that improvement is due to a more dynamic QB moreso than anything else.

    Plus they lost the superbowl anyway, how do you view the Ravens line?
    The Ravens line was so-so at best. Marshall Yanda was amazing, but outside of him, it was a constant shuffle. Oher from LT to RT, McKinnie steps in at LT late in the year, Osemele from RT to OG...

    Yet they won because of the ability and play from guys like Anquan Boldin.

    Both are damn important and always will be, but we've got 2 first round picks. We must capitalize this year as well as next year.



    THE DREAM TEAM

  2. #32
    RebelYell's Avatar
    RebelYell is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    St. Louis ,Missouri
    Posts
    2,389
    Rep Power
    45

    Re: Why the Rams would take Chance Warmack at 16

    Quote Originally Posted by sosa39rams View Post
    We must capitalize this year as well as next year.
    Must. Must. Must.

    No misses.


    Having read Jim Thomas he seems to think RB, WR and CB are still top priorities. If guys they like happen to fall to them, don't rule out a LBer, OG or OT. He comments that Warmack, Ogleetree and Lane Johnson are all options if any should fall. Personally, I'm not a fan of any of the RBs in round 1. Seems you can get talent in round 3 and later and go with a committee.

    He hints that if a QB falls, they might be persuaded to trade down if someone wants to jump up.

    Safety sounds like players 3-7 are all about the same.
    Last edited by RebelYell; -03-28-2013 at 04:17 PM.

  3. #33
    Rambos's Avatar
    Rambos is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Cali
    Age
    50
    Posts
    9,329
    Rep Power
    75

    Re: Why the Rams would take Chance Warmack at 16

    Quote Originally Posted by Fortuninerhater View Post

    Plus they lost the superbowl anyway, so who cares about them? Don't you know it's blasphemy to mention them in such glowing terms on this board?
    I agree my bad!

  4. #34
    Nick's Avatar
    Nick is offline Superbowl MVP
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Morgantown, WV
    Age
    32
    Posts
    19,666
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: Why the Rams would take Chance Warmack at 16

    Quote Originally Posted by Fortuninerhater View Post
    But my contention is that you don't have to have an all-pro at every position accross that line or in this case the "supposed best guard".
    I don't think anyone is suggesting we need an All-Pro at every position along the line. But having an All-Pro caliber player at one or even two positions would be a welcome change of pace from the thrown together mediocre at best lines we're used to seeing. I don't think we should be satisfied just because the team managed to field a decent unit last year. There's still plenty of room for improvement.

    As I see it, I think we need both offensive line help AND playmakers. If the best OL prospects are off the board but playmakers are there, take one. If the best playmakers are off the board but the OL prospects are there, take one. If both are on the board, then either way, the Rams are getting a great prospect that will help their team, and can come back on Day Two to try and address the other spot.
    Rambos and r8rh8rmike like this.

  5. #35
    Rambos's Avatar
    Rambos is offline Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Cali
    Age
    50
    Posts
    9,329
    Rep Power
    75

    Re: Why the Rams would take Chance Warmack at 16

    Jim Hanifan was on ESPN101 fast lane, he said having Warmack and Long next to each other. "Would not even be fair"

    He said his buddy Boudreau will be pounding the table for Warmack.

    Going to interesting!
    Nick and Vinnie25 like this.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: -02-11-2013, 05:13 PM
  2. After we draft Chance Warmack...
    By SportsDude in forum DRAFT & FA
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: -12-16-2012, 07:15 PM
  3. Bernie: 50% chance Dorsey, 25% chance Long
    By RamWraith in forum DRAFT & FA
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: -04-24-2008, 03:23 PM
  4. Rams get their chance to home in
    By RamWraith in forum RAM TALK
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: -09-22-2005, 06:47 AM
  5. Replies: 5
    Last Post: -11-29-2004, 06:41 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •