Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    born Guest

    would you want Lamont?

    Lamont jordan of the Oakland Raiders ,might get relased in the coming days! As insurance should we pick him up ,in case something happens to s-jax,or just to have a capeable back up! You know the new NFL is A 2 back system!this could give s-jax a break and keep him fresh!!


  2. #2
    MASSIVE Guest

    Re: would you want Lamont?

    Quote Originally Posted by born View Post
    Lamont jordan of the Oakland Raiders ,might get relased in the coming days! As insurance should we pick him up ,in case something happens to s-jax,or just to have a capeable back up! You know the new NFL is A 2 back system!this could give s-jax a break and keep him fresh!!
    I would be a good move to get a more capeable backup, but Lamont jordan would cost to much.

  3. #3
    moloch41 Guest

    Re: would you want Lamont?

    I liked him when he was with the J-E-T-S, Jets, Jets, Jets, but I haven't heard much abouth him since he's gone to Oakland other than losing his job to Justin Fargas.

  4. #4
    Mooselini Guest

    Re: would you want Lamont?

    Nope. I wouldn't touch him now. We still have Pittman (from sources is impressing our coaching staff, including Saunders). I believe its time for the Rams to start new and young. Keeping Pittman and Leonard as our back ups is the right way to go. These guys have already been signed for a few years.

  5. #5
    born Guest

    Re: would you want Lamont?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mooselini View Post
    Nope. I wouldn't touch him now. We still have Pittman (from sources is impressing our coaching staff, including Saunders). I believe its time for the Rams to start new and young. Keeping Pittman and Leonard as our back ups is the right way to go. These guys have already been signed for a few years.
    So you think if something was to happen to S-jax,the rams could win games with pittman as the #1 back! I think not. S-jax is holding out right now,the teams needs to have some leverage ,just in case the holdout is longer than anticipated,also have a good backup and not pick up the trash thats left in free agency,plus s--jax wants LT money.He's in the ballpark but not on the feild!

  6. #6
    ramsbruce's Avatar
    ramsbruce is online now Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    FIRING SCHOTTY
    Age
    42
    Posts
    3,814
    Rep Power
    52

    Re: would you want Lamont?

    No he always seems to have back problems, and besides that the Pats have already signed him.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •