No announcement yet.

Week Eleven: Post-Game Observations (aka Nick's Take on the Bradford Debates)


  • Week Eleven: Post-Game Observations

    I’m going to take a bit of a different approach this week in the Post-Game article, so hang in there on this one, folks.

    The tone of Sunday night and Monday’s discussions seemed to be a shotgun approach, as they usually are – hit a number of topics in anger regarding why the Rams didn’t come up with a victory. But one target that was really in the crosshairs this week, much more than in any previous weeks, was Sam Bradford.

    The criticism of the Rams’ young franchise quarterback has reached an all-time high, this only weeks after most concluded that Mel Kiper was out of his mind for claiming the Rams should trade Sam and draft Andrew Luck if they had the opportunity. Public opinion is starting to shift; even if the criticism of Bradford is still only originating from a minority of the fanbase, it’s a minority that’s larger than it was at this time two weeks ago.

    In the wake of this post-game fervor, I find myself reassessing where I stand. Four weeks ago, I said this...

    Bradford is "part of the solution" in that he's one of the young pieces this franchise needs to build around. He has the skills and the intelligence to be a very good quarterback, and the Rams need to surround him with better tools so he can grow and reach that potential. You can see flashes of what he's capable of doing every week, though. He's going to be one of the players that will help turn this franchise around.

    Having said that, Sam is not playing perfect football out there and he'd be the first to tell you that. Yes, he isn't well protected. Yes, his receivers are dropping balls. But he's also failing to see the entire field at times, holding onto the ball too long, and not being as accurate as we all know he can be, especially in the red zone. When you play poorly, then yes, you become part of the problem. In Sam's case, he represents a very small part and one that will likely correct itself once Sam finds himself in better circumstances.
    And I think it still applies. While I haven’t had a chance to watch yesterday’s game yet, all indications are that Sam was part of the problem against Seattle.

    I think, though, that we run the risk of arguing against straw-man positions if we continue to refer to “the problem,” as if there is only one. I think if you straight up asked Rams fans what “the problem” is, maybe they’d be able to boil it down to what they think is the biggest issue, but I bet 99 out of 100 would tell you there is more than just one “problem” on this team. There are plenty of them.

    The injuries are a problem, the installation of an offensive system in a shortened offseason is a problem, the poor offensive line play is a problem, the lack of progress at receiver is a problem, the regression of Fred Robbins and James Hall are problems, the failure of the recently acquired outside linebackers to play consistent effective football is a problem, the team’s inability to carry seven starting-caliber cornerbacks is a (tongue-in-cheek) problem, etc.

    And yes, the play of the quarterback is a problem.

    Yesterday against the Seahawks, Sam again had a ball tipped and intercepted, and again, he was staring down one side of the field and telegraphing his throw. Bradford was sacked five times on the day, and at least three if not four of them were partially his fault for holding onto the ball too long. On one occasion, he bobbled a shotgun snap and just ate the sack.

    But the concerning play did not just start yesterday. This season, Bradford has accounted for five touchdowns and eleven turnovers. That total becomes seven touchdowns to eighteen turnovers if you extend the window to the final five games of 2010. Or, if you'd rather, thirteen touchdowns and nineteen turnovers if you start from the bye week of last year. His red zone quarterback rating is 62.5, which ranks 14th in the NFC. His fourth-quarter quarterback rating is 68.9, which ranks 16th in the NFC. Not the NFL, the NFC. These aren’t good numbers, folks, and this is just a small portion of the points some could make about Bradford’s play.

    So, I think the biggest question one has to ask in the context of this discussion is, why is Sam Bradford struggling?

    Now again, we could list the variety of outside factors – injuries, protection, lack of weapons, lack of offseason, etc. Those certainly apply here and make it very difficult to achieve success. But anyone who has watched a game this season knows that those things aren’t happening on every single play. Yes, the protection has been poor overall this season. But it’s not as if Bradford is under immediate duress on every drop back. While the protection hasn’t been great over the course of the season, it becomes so much more important to take advantage of the times when it is adequate. Yes, the receivers are not consistently getting open and have dropped balls. While the receivers haven’t been great over the course of the season, it becomes so much more important to take advantage of the times when they are doing their jobs. And again, if we’re being honest, there have been a number of times this season when the protection was adequate, when a receiver was open, and Sam did not execute well enough to achieve a successful result.

    You have to remember that Bradford comes from a college program where he was rarely pressured or sacked. He was surrounded by NFL-quality talent along the offensive line and at receiver. That makes for a big adjustment coming to the pros, an adjustment that Steve Spagnuolo and Pat Shurmur tried to soften by using a dink-and-dunk, high percentage, check-down heavy, “get the ball out of your hands quickly” offense. That saved Sam from some of the tough growing pains other first round quarterbacks have had to experience in the past, but I think due to what we’re seeing now, it’s fair to wonder if that offensive scheme and gameplan was really growing Sam as a professional quarterback or adequately preparing him for life in the NFL.

    Whereas quarterbacks like Kurt Warner and Marc Bulger spent years sustaining beatings in the Martz offenses before displaying the symptoms of Battered Quarterback Syndrome, some would argue Sam Bradford is beginning to show the signs merely a year and a half into his pro career. Simply put, I don’t think Sam is used to taking this kind of punishment. It’s new to him.

    I’m beginning to fear that we’re dividing into two camps Camp A believes the quarterback is primarily a victim of his circumstances, and Camp B who believes that the quarterback is a contributor to those circumstances. By drawing a line in the sand, each camp exaggerates the other’s position. Camp B will falsely claim that those in Camp A aren’t holding Sam responsible for his play or think he’s blameless. Camp A will falsely claim that those in Camp B are ignoring the woeful circumstances around Bradford by labeling him as “the problem.”

    I’m really not interested in any of that. We most recently went through it with Marc Bulger, and it birthed more snipes and attacks than it did meaningful discussions and debates. I’m merely interested in being honest, and when you take an honest look at the Rams and Sam Bradford this year, you’ll find a quarterback playing bad football on a bad team.

    Does that necessarily make him a bad quarterback? No, but he’s beginning to display some bad habits that are going to have to be corrected. That not only means the Rams doing a better job protecting him and improving the talent around him, but it also means Sam taking it upon himself to identify those areas and improve upon them.

    Sam Bradford is an exceptionally talented quarterback with incredible potential as an NFL signal-caller. But he now finds himself in less than ideal circumstances, and he’s not responding well to them. Which direction will the story of Sam Bradford take?

    Will he refocus his efforts and become the leader who brings this team out of shadow? Or will he allow the circumstances around him to erode his physical and mental talents to the point of no return?

    Only time will tell.
      Posting comments is disabled.



    Article Tags


    Latest Articles


    • Nick's Post-Senior Bowl 2016 NFL First Round Mock Draft (v2.0)
      Now that the Senior Bowl is firmly in the rear view mirrior, here's an updated look at how things could shake out in the first round of the NFL Draft this year. As always, feedback and constructive criticism is welcome! ROUND ONE 1. Tennessee Titans: Laremy Tunsil, OT, Mississippi -Tennessee is second in the league in sacks allowed, and no quarterback when pressured has been sacked at as large of a percentage as Marcus Mariota has been. Tunsil gives the Titans a legitimate left tackle to pair with Taylor Lewan on the offensive line. 2. Cleveland Browns: Jared Goff, QB, California -The hype train for Carson Wentz is in full steam, but I'm not ready to put him in the Top 5 as some other people are. I still view Goff as the top QB in the class, meaning he makes a lot of sense for a Cleveland team that is tired of Johnny Manziel's screw ups. 3. San Diego Chargers: Jalen Ramsey, CB, Florida State -Brandon Flowers was graded out as one of the worst corners in the league by Pro Football Focus, and Eric Weddle won't be coming back. The Chargers could use help in both areas, and Ramsey is capable of excelling at either at the next level. 4. Dallas Cowboys: Joey Bosa, DE, Ohio State -Will the Cowboys flirt with taking a QB here? Maybe, but I also think Jerr...
      -01-31-2016, 03:12 PM
    • RamView, 1/3/2016: ***** 19, Rams 16 (OT) (Long)
      RamView, January 3, 2016 Game #16: ***** 19, Rams 16 (OT) The ever-inconsistent Rams regress back to the mean and end another losing season with another disappointing loss to a team they had no business losing to. The hallmark of Jeff Fisher Rams football isn't the running game or aggressive defense, it's miserable losses like this one. Good riddance to 2015. Position by position: * QB: Case Keenum (23-37-231, PR 77.6) does a lot right for the Rams at QB. He runs the offense with good tempo and gets the ball out quickly on quick-timing plays. He’s smart and tough in the pocket, uses his mobility well and rarely gets sacked. The best example of that was a play he made in the 3rd. He rolled right, deked a free-running Aaron Lynch into pul...
      -01-05-2016, 09:50 PM
    • Rams lose 19-16 in OT to whiners; The Good, Bad and Ugly
      general counsel
      The Todd Gurley-less Rams finished their season 7-9 with a disappointing OT loss to the whiners by the score of 19-16 on the strength of terrible third down play on both sides of the ball, untimely penalties, terrible field goal kicking and some highly suspect play calling with the team poised to win the game in overtime. The Rams shortcomings against a 5-11 couldnt have been more obvious today. At the end of the day, Case Keenum is not an NFL starting qb, albeit a reasonable backup. Way too many missed opportunities, and without todd gurley, and with all of our injuries on defense, we arent close to good enough to simply have a qb who is going to avoid mistakes at all costs, afraid to make throws. Toss in some untimely drops by our receivers and at least one terrible call by the refs that obviously cost us 3 points at the minimum, and you find a way to lose a game that we all know we should have won. No points...
      -01-04-2016, 01:51 AM
    • Rams beat seachickens 23-17; The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
      general counsel
      In what should be considered their most impressive win in the Fisher era, the Rams won their third game in a row by beating and beating up the seachickens in a tremendous 23-17 win. The Rams capitalized on 3 seachicken turnovers (one of which resulted in a defensive touchdown), didn't turn the ball over themselves, kept the penalties to a minimum, and scrounged out just enough offense to earn their first season sweep of the chickens since 2004. The Rams played their best half of the year jumping out to a 16-3 lead at the break and hung in there to avoid a collapse at the scene of so many painful prior year debacles. Frankly, i am riddled with mixed and incredibly extreme and passionate emotions at this point. On the one hand, i am so thrilled with a tremendous win over a playoff caliber team on the road in which the Rams proved once and for all that they have the talent and capability to win big games, notwithstanding...
      -12-28-2015, 01:40 AM
    • Rams beat seachickens 23-17; The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
      Good write up.

      I think it was ugly that we accepted the penalty with the Seagulla on 4 and 10. Giving them a new (long) third down. I am pretty sure they would not have gone for it on 4 and 10.

      Else great game.
      -12-28-2015, 01:39 AM
    • RamView, 12/17/2015: Rams 31, Bucs 23 (Long)
      RamView, December 17, 2015 Game #14: Rams 31, Bucs 23 If this was the Rams' last week in St. Louis, at least they made it a heck of a week. They won for the second time in five days Thursday night and made the Bucs look like the team that could not cut the mustard. Position by position: * QB: Case Keenum (14-17-234, 2 TD, PR 158.0) managed the heck out of this game. He led the Rams to an opening drive TD throwing little but screens and swing passes. But Case did not live on small ball alone, also throwing a perfect 60-yard TD bomb to Kenny Britt later in the 1st. The Ram passing game was in good rhythm much of the game, and Keenum distributed the ball well. On the Rams' TD drive in the 2nd, he hit Tavon Austin for 13, Lance K...
      -12-20-2015, 03:01 AM