No announcement yet.

What did you think of the ending of LOST?

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • What did you think of the ending of LOST?

    Are their any LOSTies out there who may or may not have watched the full 6 years of the series? What did you think of the show? What did you think of the ending?

  • #2
    Re: What did you think of the ending of LOST?

    I absolutely loved it Viper. I couldn't have asked for a better ending. How'd you feel about it?
    Always and Forever a fan of the St. Louis Rams


    • #3
      Re: What did you think of the ending of LOST?

      I thought it was great, very moving. But a couple of people at the Lost party I had were not as thrilled. It'll definitely be a controversial one that will have people talking, because so many people wanted more answers than what they got. But I thought it was really great.


      • #4
        Re: What did you think of the ending of LOST?

        I liked it a lot. A surreal ending to a surreal show of epic proportions. They left many questions unanswered. While addressing some of the big picture concepts to some degree. They did leave a lot up to the viewers imagination. But, that will encourage conversation and debate for years to come.

        This show was more about the characters than it was about the island. The island was the vehicle that allowed the characters to unveil themselves to us week after week. I liked seeing all of the characters at the end, at peace with each other and together forever. All in all I'm pleased with the closure that the ending brought.
        Last edited by viper; -05-24-2010, 04:44 PM.


        • #5
          Re: What did you think of the ending of LOST?

          It was appropriate. I had a feeling they'd never really explain everything or even give the viewers enough to piece it all together. In that way, it was a bit disappointing, but sort of an expected disappointment if such a thing can be said to exist.

          When you think about it, this is really about the only way a show that has killed almost every character that has ever appeared on it could have a "happy" ending.


          • #6
            Re: What did you think of the ending of LOST?

            It was sure a lot better than the ending of the Sopranos.

            ramming speed to all

            general counsel


            • #7
              Re: What did you think of the ending of LOST?

              Originally posted by general counsel View Post
              It was sure a lot better than the ending of the Sopranos.

              ramming speed to all

              general counsel
              I'd have to agree with you on that one, GC. They needed to take a stand on the ending instead of leaving us with a cliff hanger.


              • #8
                Re: What did you think of the ending of LOST?

                I found this little nugget about Lost's ending that I thought was interesting.

                From someone at Bad Robot:


                Good stuff on here! I can finally throw in my two cents! I've had to bite my tongue for far too long. Also, hopefully I can answer some of John's questions about Dharma and the "pointless breadcrumbs" that really, weren't so pointless ...

                First ...
                The Island:

                It was real. Everything that happened on the island that we saw throughout the 6 seasons was real. Forget the final image of the plane crash, it was put in purposely to f*&k with people's heads and show how far the show had come. They really crashed. They really survived. They really discovered Dharma and the Others. The Island keeps the balance of good and evil in the world. It always has and always will perform that role. And the Island will always need a "Protector". Jacob wasn't the first, Hurley won't be the last. However, Jacob had to deal with a malevolent force (MIB) that his mother, nor Hurley had to deal with. He created the devil and had to find a way to kill him -- even though the rules prevented him from actually doing so.

                Thus began Jacob's plan to bring candidates to the Island to do the one thing he couldn't do. Kill the MIB. He had a huge list of candidates that spanned generations. Yet everytime he brought people there, the MIB corrupted them and caused them to kill one another. That was until Richard came along and helped Jacob understand that if he didn't take a more active role, then his plan would never work.

                Enter Dharma -- which I'm not sure why John is having such a hard time grasping. Dharma, like the countless scores of people that were brought to the island before, were brought there by Jacob as part of his plan to kill the MIB. However, the MIB was aware of this plan and interferred by "corrupting" Ben. Making Ben believe he was doing the work of Jacob when in reality he was doing the work of the MIB. This carried over into all of Ben's "off-island" activities. He was the leader. He spoke for Jacob as far as they were concerned. So the "Others" killed Dharma and later were actively trying to kill Jack, Kate, Sawyer, Hurley and all the candidates because that's what the MIB wanted. And what he couldn't do for himself.

                Dharma was originally brought in to be good. But was turned bad by MIB's corruption and eventually destroyed by his pawn Ben. Now, was Dharma only brought there to help Jack and the other Canditates on their overall quest to kill Smokey? Or did Jacob have another list of Canidates from the Dharma group that we were never aware of? That's a question that is purposley not answered because whatever answer the writers came up with would be worse than the one you come up with for yourself. Still ... Dharma's purpose is not "pointless" or even vague. Hell, it's pretty blantent.

                Still, despite his grand plan, Jacob wanted to give his "candidates" (our Lostaways) the one thing he, nor his brother, were ever afforded: free will. Hence him bringing a host of "candidates" through the decades and letting them "choose" which one would actually do the job in the end. Maybe he knew Jack would be the one to kill Flocke and that Hurley would be the protector in the end. Maybe he didn't. But that was always the key question of the show: Fate vs Free-will. Science vs Faith. Personally I think Jacob knew from the beginning what was going to happen and that everyone played a part over 6 seasons in helping Jack get to the point where he needed to be to kill Smokey and make Hurley the protector -- I know that's how a lot of the writers viewed it. But again, they won't answer that (nor should they) because that ruins the fun.

                In the end, Jack got to do what he always wanted to do from the very first episode of the show: Save his fellow Lostaways. He got Kate and Sawyer off the island and he gave Hurley the purpose in life he'd always been missing. And, in Sideways world (which we'll get to next) he in fact saved everyone by helping them all move on ...


                Sideways World:

                Sideways world is where it gets really cool in terms of theology and metaphysical discussion (for me at least -- because I love history/religion theories and loved all the talks in the writer's room about it). Basically what the show is proposing is that we're all linked to certain people during our lives. Call them soulmates (though it's not exactly the best word). But these people we're linked to are with us duing "the most important moments of our lives" as Christian said. These are the people we move through the universe with from lifetime to lifetime. It's loosely based in Hinduisim with large doses of western religion thrown into the mix.

                The conceit that the writers created, basing it off these religious philosophies, was that as a group, the Lostaways subconsciously created this "sideways" world where they exist in purgatory until they are "awakened" and find one another. Once they all find one another, they can then move on and move forward. In essence, this is the show's concept of the afterlife. According to the show, everyone creates their own "Sideways" purgatory with their "soulmates" throughout their lives and exist there until they all move on together. That's a beautiful notion. Even if you aren't religious or even spirtual, the idea that we live AND die together is deeply profound and moving.

                It's a really cool and spirtual concept that fits the whole tone and subtext the show has had from the beginning. These people were SUPPOSED to be together on that plane. They were supposed to live through these events -- not JUST because of Jacob. But because that's what the universe or God (depending on how religious you wish to get) wanted to happen. The show was always about science vs faith -- and it ultimately came down on the side of faith. It answered THE core question of the series. The one question that has been at the root of every island mystery, every character backstory, every plot twist. That, by itself, is quite an accomplishment.

                How much you want to extrapolate from that is up to you as the viewer. Think about season 1 when we first found the Hatch. Everyone thought that's THE answer! Whatever is down there is the answer! Then, as we discovered it was just one station of many. One link in a very long chain that kept revealing more, and more of a larger mosiac.

                But the writer's took it even further this season by contrasting this Sideways "purgatory" with the Island itself. Remember when Michael appeared to Hurley, he said he was not allowed to leave the Island. Just like the MIB. He wasn't allowed into this sideways world and thus, was not afforded the opportunity to move on. Why? Because he had proven himself to be unworthy with his actions on the Island. He failed the test. The others, passed. They made it into Sideways world when they died -- some before Jack, some years later. In Hurley's case, maybe centuries later. They exist in this sideways world until they are "awakened" and they can only move on TOGETHER because they are linked. They are destined to be together for eternity. That was their destiny.

                They were NOT linked to Anna Lucia, Daniel, Roussou, Alex, Miles, Lupidis, (and all the rest who weren't in the chuch -- basically everyone who wasn't in season 1). Yet those people exist in Sideways world. Why? Well again, here's where they leave it up to you to decide. The way I like to think about it, is that those people who were left behind in Sideways world have to find their own soulmates before they can wake up. It's possible that those links aren't people from the island but from their other life (Anna's parnter, the guy she shot --- Roussou's husband, etc etc).

                A lot of people have been talking about Ben and why he didn't go into the Church. And if you think of Sideways world in this way, then it gives you the answer to that very question. Ben can't move on yet because he hasn't connected with the people he needs to. It's going to be his job to awaken Roussou, Alex, Anna Lucia (maybe), Ethan, Goodspeed, his father and the rest. He has to attone for his sins more than he did by being Hurley's number two. He has to do what Hurley and Desmond did for our Lostaways with his own people. He has to help them connect. And he can only move on when all the links in his chain are ready to. Same can be said for Faraday, Charlotte, Whidmore, Hawkins etc. It's really a neat, and cool concept. At least to me.

                But, from a more "behind the scenes" note: the reason Ben's not in the church, and the reason no one is in the church but for Season 1 people is because they wrote the ending to the show after writing the pilot. And never changed it. The writers always said (and many didn't believe them) that they knew their ending from the very first episode. I applaud them for that. It's pretty fantastic. Originally Ben was supposed to have a 3 episode arc and be done. But he became a big part of the show. They could have easily changed their ending and put him in the church -- but instead they problem solved it. Gave him a BRILLIANT moment with Locke outside the church ... and then that was it. I loved that. For those that wonder -- the original ending started the moment Jack walked into the church and touches the casket to Jack closing his eyes as the other plane flies away. That was always JJ's ending. And they kept it.

                For me the ending of this show means a lot. Not only because I worked on it, but because as a writer it inspired me in a way the medium had never done before. I've been inspired to write by great films. Maybe too many to count. And there have been amazing TV shows that I've loved (X-Files, 24, Sopranos, countless 1/2 hour shows). But none did what LOST did for me. None showed me that you could take huge risks (writing a show about faith for network TV) and stick to your creative guns and STILL please the audience. I learned a lot from the show as a writer. I learned even more from being around the incredible writers, producers, PAs, interns and everyone else who slaved on the show for 6 years.

                In the end, for me, LOST was a touchstone show that dealt with faith, the afterlife, and all these big, spirtual questions that most shows don't touch. And to me, they never once waivered from their core story -- even with all the sci-fi elements they mixed in. To walk that long and daunting of a creative tightrope and survive is simply astounding.


                • #9
                  Re: What did you think of the ending of LOST?

                  Another one:

                  Conclusions from ScreenRant (Part 1):

                  I don’t know why people are having trouble understanding this, as it is CLEARLY explained in the final minutes of the finale episode by Christian Shephard (Jack’s dad). The original Oceanic 815 plane crash happened. Everything on the Island through seasons 1-6 happened. The “flash sideways” universe introduced in season 6 was a sort of stop-over point between life and afterlife (referred to here as the “purgatory universe”).

                  Each person in this “purgatory universe” created a reality for themselves based on their lingering issues in life – that which they could not “let go” of. For Jack it was Daddy issues; Kate, the guilt of murder; Sawyer, the quest to find “Sawyer” and be a better man; Sayid, the unrequited love of Nadia; Charlie, looking for something “real” in his hollow life of fame, etc…

                  Everyone was still attached to their Earthly concerns (we’re getting very Buddhist here, bear with me) – but when they made contact with those people they’d met on the Island, they remembered the journey and growth they had experienced because of the Island, and could finally understand the connections and “purpose” brought into their damaged lives by being there. With that greater understanding of themselves, they were each ready to “leave” or “move on” to the next phase of existence – i.e., the true afterlife.

                  Some people are convinced the final image during the end credits of the Lost finale was the “clue” to the characters being dead the whole time. OK, let’s think about this: The image appears during the closing credits, after the final appearance of the “LOST” logo. That means that the story had officially ended. Saying that the biggest reveal came while the end credits were rolling is like saying a movie’s climax happens during the end credits. Not bloody likely.

                  The image of the plane crash (if you look closely) has memorabilia from the Lostie’s time on the beach where they first made camp. Shacks, towels, etc… it was one part nostalgia (remember where it all began?) and also one part commentary on the circular nature of the Island.

                  Like the Black Rock ship that brought Richard to the Island (“Ab Aeterno“), or the downed plane with the heroin that had Mr. Ecko’s brother’s corpse inside of it (“The 23rd Psalm“), the remains of Oceanic 815 and the evidence of a small community built on the beach are just more monuments of the Island. The next time somebody crashes there, they’ll see that stuff and wonder what the “mystery” behind it is…

                  Then they’ll whine and complain about how unsatisfying the answer is. (“What? That’s how that mystical guy “Hurley” came to the Island? LAME.”)

                  WHAT WAS DESMOND’S POWER?
                  One of the biggest things people seem to be questioning is how Desmond was able to “wake up” from the purgatory universe and how he had the know-how to “wake up” the other Losties. For that answer, you really just have to look back over the history of Desmond.

                  Desmond (specifically through his connection to Penny Widmore) is a sort of “constant” in the show. No matter what happens, when, or where, Desmond seems somehow immune to the Island’s energy (which has electromagnetic properties) and has a sort of awareness that can transcend space and time (his consciousness shifts seen in episodes like “The Constant“). These “shifts” and Widmore’s explanation that Desmond is special because of his resistance to the Island’s energies, imply that Desmond would even be able to “shift” his consciousness back and forth between this universe and the purgatory one, catalyzed by Widmore’s team placing him in that huge electromagnetic machine in the season six episode, “Happily Ever After“.

                  So, it does stand to reason (at least Lost reasoning) that Desmond – after having his consciousness “shifted” to the purgatory reality – would “wake up” after encountering HIS constant, Penny. It’s another fast and loose metaphysical explanation, but one that (for me) still works within the framework of the show.

                  Over the course of the show people have wondered about the mythology of the Island – where it came from, what it is and what are the “rules” that govern it and its mystical protectors? Admittedly, this is an area where the showrunners played things fast and loose, hoping that the momentum of the characters’ story arcs and the whole “good vs. evil” showdown would be enough to appease most fans. Alas, not so.

                  Season six of Lost did a great deal to semi-explain what the island was – a sort of container for a very important energy that seemingly links this world with worlds beyond… or something. That energy is represented by light and water, and if that light goes out and the water stops flowing, the world is basically screwed. Everything magical or fantastic about the Island stems from this energy, and many of the technological oddities found on the Island (the Swan Station from season 2) are a result of the Dharma Initiative trying to harness and control that energy (i.e., man trying to bend magic and mysticism to the will of modern science).

                  However, there are some things that were definitely left unexplained: Why did the Man In Black become a smoke monster when he was exposed to the light (was it a manifestation of his corrupted soul)?; What is the nature of the “rules” that governed certain aspects of the Island – who could come and go, who could kill who, who was healed from injury (Locke, Rose), who lived forever (Richard). How were these rules established and maintained?

                  The Jacob/MIB origin episode, “Across The Sea”, attempted to fill in that aspect of the Island mythology, but what we came away with were a lot of vague pseudo-explanations. The protector of the Island basically makes up the rules and once those rules are established they are set until somebody (a new protector?) changes them. This is the reason why the MIB was obsessed with “finding a loophole” in order to kill Jacob; it’s also why Jack was ultimately able to kill the MIB. Smokey was connected to the energy source, and when Jack had Desmond “turn off” that energy, Smokey lost his powers and was merely flesh and blood again.

                  Ok… so there’s implication of what the Island’s “rules” are, but that gets a bit problematic when you think back to season 4 of Lost – which is basically about Charles Widmore sending operatives to the island to do what he cannot (get revenge on Ben Linus). There was that whole sub-plot about how it was ‘against the rules’ for Widmore to return to the Island, and how Widmore “changed the rules” by killing Ben’s adopted daughter, Alex. But why would the “rules” of the Island’s protectors apply to these two guys?

                  In the end, I think the showrunners went for an “It is what it is,” approach with the mystical rules governing the Island; they are convenient plot devices that support the story at various points, but don’t really hold up when looked at in conjunction with the entire series. The Widmore/Linus conundrum is simply one of those holes – a weak point of the Lost mythology, for sure.

                  Remember when Lost had African-Americans as part of its “groundbreaking international cast?” Yeah, I vaguely do too. One friend of mine (and I’m sure of yours) watched the finale chanting “They better bring back Walt!” over and over – but no such luck.

                  Walt and his father Michael did make latter season Lost appearances: Locke visited Walt off the Island in the season five episode “The Life and Death of Jeremy Bentham” and Michael appeared to Hurley as a ghost in season six, explaining the whole “whispers on the Island” thing. Still, many fans wondered why Walt, Michael and the “tailie” priest, Mr. Eko, didn’t reunite with the other cast members at the purgatory all-faith church in the finale.

                  Well, Michael we know is stuck on the Island as a “whisper” because he can’t move on, due to his killing of Libby and Ana Lucia in season two. Walt was freed from the Island early on, so the journey that bonded the Oceanic passengers in the purgatory universe was one that Walt was never really part of.

                  As for Mr. Eko, his death in the season 3 episode “The Cost of Living” showed that Eko had come to peace with his life. When told by the ghost of his brother Yemi to “Confess his sins,” Eko refused, saying that he had no guilt to confess; in his life, he did what he had to do to survive. The smoke monster evaluated Eko, who stood resolute about himself, his sins and the faith and redemption he’d ultimately found. After smokey beat Eko to pulp, Eko’s last vision was his young self walking away with his brother, holding the soccer ball they used to play with.

                  In short: Eko, by finding his faith and coming to peace with himself, had no reason to be in the purgatory world with the others. Wherever his soul was going, it was prepared for that journey – unlike the other passengers, who still had to come to peace with themselves and their deaths.

                  That all sounds deep, sure, but I’m sure off-screen conflicts with the actors and the fact that Macolm David Kelley (the kid who played Walt) hit puberty were also major factors.


                  • #10
                    Re: What did you think of the ending of LOST?

                    Conclusions from ScreenRant (Part 2)

                    WHAT ABOUT THE POLAR BEARS?
                    If you’re asking this question, you weren’t really paying attention to the show. Go rent Lost season 3 on DVD and see if you can’t figure out the polar bear “mystery” when the rest of us did… back in 2006. I’ll give you a hint: Dharma Initiative experiments.

                    WHAT ABOUT THE NUMBERS?
                    In the season six episode “The Substitute” Un-Locke takes Sawyer down to “Jacob’s cave” on the cliff (where Jack ultimately killed MIB) and in that cave, Sawyer observes that Jacob’s list of “candidates” for his replacement – our Losties – have numbers by their names. The list of candidates (Sawyer, Jack, Locke, Hugo, Sayid and “Kwon”) equate to the numbers 4-8-15-16-23-42 – the numbers that both steered Hurley to the Island in the first place (he went to Australia to find out about them), and served as the code for releasing the Island’s tapped energy in The Swan station. The numbers also showed up again and again throughout the show (Danielle’s papers, on medicine Claire and Desmond take, on Mr. Eko’s stick, etc…).

                    So in the end the numbers had to do with fate, and were a nice little numerology motif for the showrunners to play with (and a mathematical mystery for fans to agonize over). THE END.

                    BEN CONTROLS SMOKEY?
                    In the season 4 episode “The Shape of Things To Come” Ben Linus witnessed the murder of his daughter Alex at the hands of Charles Widmore’s mercenaries. Ben then accessed the secret room in his Dharma house and disappeared into a secret passage covered in hieroglyphics. When Ben returned, he brought the smoke monster with him, which murdered the team of Widmore’s assassins. Now we know the smoke monster was the Man In Black, but some viewers are still confused why Ben was able to “control the monster” in this season 4 episode, but not later in season six.

                    However, it is never said that Ben “controls” the smoke monster – the best word would be “summons.” This makes sense to the story, as Alex’s death is the event that makes Ben turn to the MIB for a favor – a favor which he later repays in season 5 by killing Jacob for the MIB. It’s the ultimate corruption of Ben Linus – the moment where he goes from being a blind servant of Jacob to serving evil. So I don’t quite consider this a loose end – just another case of misinterpretation by some viewers.

                    JACOB vs. THE DHARMA INITIATIVE
                    Ok, so this is MY major question. In one of my favorite Lost episodes, “The Man Behind The Curtain“, we learn all about Ben Linus’ childhood with the Dharma Initiative. The episode ends with the chilling revelation that Ben – conspiring with Richard – betrays “his people” in the initiative and mass murders them using nerve gas – including his own father. Ben then reveals to Locke what ultimately became of the Dharma Initiative: The Others threw their bodies into a gruesome mass grave.

                    Looking back from the series finale and the “Across The Sea” episode about Jacob’s past, I can’t help but wonder: did Jacob murder the Dharma Initiative?

                    We know that Richard is an emissary of Jacob – that is, Richard does Jacob’s bidding. So if Richard instructed Ben to kill the Dharma members, doesn’t that imply that Jacob instructed Richard to do so, much the same way Jacob’s “mother” slaughtered the men on the Island when the Man In Black got to close to them?

                    I find it hard to explain the death of the Dharma Initiative any other way, and that’s a huge narrative problem when you consider that our Losties – many of whom lived with and befriended the Dharma Initiative in the 70s – ultimately serve Jacob as well. They’re serving the man who most likely gave the order to murder their friends and co-workers!

                    It also blurs the lines between good and evil. Mass murder is never a good thing, so the fact that Jacob at least allowed the mass murder of the Dharma Initiative (it’s his role as “protector,” right?) is pretty ghastly when you think about it. This is the embodiment of “good” we’re supposed to root for? Makes you think the Man In Black wasn’t ALL bad…

                    WHAT ABOUT THE BOMB?
                    For me this is also a major problem of the Lost mythology. For much of season 6, many fans assumed (based on the opening to the season six premiere, “LA X“) that the bomb that Jack and Co. detonated in the 70s (the season 5 finale) resulted in the Island sinking and an alternate timeline being created, in which Oceanic 815 never crashed, and things were slightly different in the lives of the passengers.

                    Now we know that the “alternate timeline” was actually purgatory where the Losties all met up when they were dead, and the whole “alternate timeline” bit was a red herring. So what, exactly, did the bomb do?

                    The obvious answer is that the bomb propelled the Losties back through time to the present day, where the the Swan station (a.k.a. “The Hatch”) was now a slightly different version of its former imploded self.

                    Like most time travel narratives, the situation with the hatch raises a ton of logistical questions, such as: Would Desmond still be on the island if the hatch had been destroyed in the past? Wouldn’t that alteration to the time stream have a ripple effect that disrupted everything else regarding the Oceanic 815 crashing? And so on…

                    Instead what we got was a time travel scenario where that one location, the 70s Swan station, seemed to “overlap” on its present-day self, while leaving the rest of the time stream unaffected (or something like that). It’s confusing and very problematic – yet another reason why time travel is something you probably want to stay away from as a storyteller…

                    In the end though, the outcome is the same: Whatever conduit to the Island’s energy source that the Dharma Initiative tapped when they made the Swan station was ultimately exhausted. Whether it was exhausted by the bomb Juliet set off, or the the moment in season 3 when Locke lost his faith and refused to push the button (“Live Together, Die Alone“) the energy was released, and The Swan was destroyed. The Losties made it back to the present, and there was never two timelines, apparently.


                    • #11
                      Re: What did you think of the ending of LOST?

                      What I loved was this simple message: Acceptance. Let's face it, there are many different religions and ideologies that people live and die by but it doesn't mean that we as human beings can't co-exist peacefully and that was the point. It doesn't matter what race or religion you are, we are all in this thing together and although we may not agree on everything people need to live in harmony with one another. I'm not a religious person whatsoever but that's what LOST preached (to me at least) and that's something I have and always will live by.
                      Always and Forever a fan of the St. Louis Rams


                      • #12
                        Re: What did you think of the ending of LOST?

                        Well you had to watch it from beginning to end to get the ideal you know. From 2004 to 2010 that is!
                        Carolina Panthers @ Denver Broncos 2/7/2016 CBS 6:30PM EST Santa Clara CA!


                        • #13
                          Re: What did you think of the ending of LOST?

                          I watched the first two episodes...then i.... well....yada yada i couldn`t watch anymore shows..


                          Related Topics


                          • Bruce=GOAT
                            Hulk Hogan: I thank God I'm alive
                            by Bruce=GOAT

                            WWE wrestling news – The LilsBoys' Over The Top Rope

                            EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW
                            Hogan: I thank God I'm alive

                            By SIMON ROTHSTEIN of THE LILSBOYS
                            August 04, 2007

                            WRESTLING legend Hulk Hogan has lashed out at the industry which made him a megastar.

                            And he has demanded an end to the decades-long cover-up of steroid abuse in the sport.

                            Hogan, 54, took the muscle-enhancing drugs almost daily for 16 years during his career and says he can spot a user a mile off.

                            With more than 100 grapplers dying before the age of 50 in the last decade, he is begging others to face up to the crisis.

                            The Sun has been leading an anti-steroid abuse campaign since wrestler Chris Benoit murdered his wife and seven-year-old son before committing suicide in June.

                            A handful of former stars have already spoken out and prompted US politicians to start investigating the industry.

                            But many in the WWE, the world's biggest fight franchise, deny there is a problem and have blasted their ex-colleagues as bitter failures who haven't wrestled in years.

                            They cannot same the same about Hogan, wrestling's equivalent of Pele or Muhammad Ali who was fighting for them just 12 months ago.

                            In an exclusive Sun interview, he said: "Are steroids a problem in wrestling? Oh God yeah. They have always been a part of the business. It's prevalent.

                            "But there's not some big mystery to it. Just open your eyes and it's there. You can look at a wrestler and pretty much tell.

                            "They will be above their weight range, with these big veins. My body weight is around 285lb, depending on how much junk I eat. Even if I was 25 and clean, I could probably only carry 300lb.

                            "Yet when I was wrestling I weighed anywhere between 320 and 340lb, because my body was full of water weight.

                            "My face was puffy, my arms were so bulky I couldn't touch my shoulders. You could take one look at me and know I was on something.

                            "Steroids have been around for ever in other sports too, but if we have to pick on somebody now then let's pick on wrestling.

                            "I'm glad the business is in the spotlight because they're probably the only ones smart enough, after being able to dodge it for so long, to know how to fix it."

                            The Hulkster added: "I remember up until the early 1990s any wrestler could walk into a doctor and they'd write you a prescription for steroids.

                            "Then there was a huge trial where WWE boss Vince McMahon was unfairly accused and rightly acquitted of distributing the drugs to his workers.

                            "This ushered in the era of wrestlers playing 'hide and seek'.
                            -08-05-2007, 02:28 AM
                          • Nick
                            My Episode III Review (spoilers)
                            by Nick
                            The more things change, the more they stay the same.

                            I would have liked to believe, after reading reviews like Kevin Smith's who had nothing but praise for this movie, that Lucas was really going to turn a corner. Sadly, I saw the same things from the first two movies in this one, though the subject matter made it a bit more tolerable. I'd hardly say it was amazing, but it was at least better than the first two prequels.

                            The lightsaber battles were very well done, and I think the acting improved overall (though I still wasn't really feeling Hayden's performance), but to me, the story, like the first two, seemed pretty weak at times. And like the first two, it seemed to me like Lucas really overdid the visuals to make up for the plot.

                            I could have done without General Grievous entirely, including the large-scale battle between Obi-Wan and the troops against Grievous and his seperatists. Having not seen the Clone Wars cartoon, I'm told he was introduced in it - dunno if that's right or not. But it all just seemed unnecessary - Dooku was in the movie for maybe five minutes, why not just keep him as the secondary opposition, since he was well established in that role already? Perhaps showing off a CGI robot with four lightsaber-wielding arms had something to do with it...

                            Also, I think the scene in which Anakin devotes himself to Palpatine after Windu was killed was weak. Anakin cries out, "What have I done?!" when he realizes he helped kill Windu, as if he was remorseful and realized what he was doing was wrong... and then suddenly is proclaiming loyalty to Sidius. I understand why, what with the whole "I can save Padme with the power of the Dark Side" thing, but I think it needed to be fleshed out more to emphasize that's why he was doing it. I didn't feel like Lucas really captured Anakin's motivation and approach like he should have, but rather it was just an after thought instead of the focus of his decision. I needed to see more conflict there.

                            The ending was rushed, IMO, like Lucas felt he was out of time and just wanted to tie everything up to lead into the original trilogy, which to be fair, I think he did a decent job with. I'm sure Lucas wanted to avoid a huge ending with a bunch of dialogue after the two big fights, but I think the movie would have benefitted from a slower pace to just elaborate on what was going on - like what Return of the King had, which I know some might have thought was unnecessary but I disagree. Yoda's comment to Obi-Wan about talking to Qui-Gon was so out of left field and out of place, it was ridiculously bad, only topped by Darth Vader's "NOOOOOOOOOO!" when he finds out Padme is dead. Seriously, what the heck? Half the theater was laughing.

                            That said, the effects were all visually stunning, even if gratuitous in some spots. The lightsaber duels were outstanding, though I would have preferred...
                            -05-19-2005, 02:47 AM
                          • Nick
                            Post-Game Quotes from Spags & Players
                            by Nick
                            Rams at Seahawks Postgame Quotes - Rams Coach/Players
                            Posted 02 January 2011

                            RAMS HEAD COACH STEVE SPAGNUOLO

                            “Obviously disappointed. I’ll start out by saying, win or lose, I think God always has his hand on this football team. I’m always going to say that and I’m grateful for that. I’ll credit Seattle and wish them luck next week. They played better. They won and we lost. A lot of things we certainly could have done better. I am proud of the football team for what they accomplished. That might make a little more sense tomorrow. The disappointment is all we feel right now. Probably got to get a good night sleep somehow and then reflect back on some of the things we might have done really good. I think injury-wise we got through okay. The only guy at the end there, Reggie said something might have been Chris Long’s hand. I don’t really have any idea what it is but we’ll take a look at it. With that, I’ll open it up.”

                            (On why he thinks they weren’t able to move the ball)
                            “Yeah. Field position was an issue. I can’t remember on all the swings of series but it seemed like a lot of them we were always coming out of our own end zone, you know, inside the 20. Even the drive we had for a field goal was an 80 yard drive, or 80-something. I know it was a long drive. I don’t know… Field position, maybe they punted it real well. We must have been giving up a little yardage defensively to have them move but field position was an issue, especially in the second half when I recall.”

                            (On Steven Jackson only having about 10 carries)
                            “I would have to look at it. We’re not counting them and all that as we go. I’d have to go back to down and distance situations and then you’re not gonna bang your head against the wall but do what we had to do to try to move the ball.”

                            (On if it was busted coverage on the deep completion to Ruvell Martin on Seattle’s first drive)
                            “It wasn’t a busted coverage. I think we got a little over-aggressive on the – he pumped it to the little flair route or the bubble screen, and then held onto it a little bit and then found him (Martin). That hurt us early because it gave them field position and they ended up with a touchdown on I think that drive.”

                            (On what he tells the players after the game)
                            “Well, I told them – there’s not a lot to say neatly after the game. We’ll get together tomorrow. Certainly, we’re all disappointed. I did tell them that I appreciated their efforts this year from the bottom of my heart because I thought the work ethic and what they did, hanging together and enjoying each other and some of the things we did along the way, I was very appreciative of that. Other than that, to stand in front of the team as disappointed as they are right now… I don’t spend a lot of time; I’ll do that tomorrow.”

                            (On the play that was called incomplete when Bradford threw to the sideline near the goal line...
                            -01-03-2011, 11:22 AM
                          • RealRam
                            An Interview w/Deacon Jones / Sept. 27, jersey retired
                            by RealRam
                            :ram: Thanks Deacon, for all those fantastic / fearsome plays! An absolutely phenomenal Rams DEFENSE, ca. 1966-1970.

                            - - - - - - - No. 75, HOF ... ... 6'-5", 275 lbs. of pure attack, head slap and sack!

                            PS: Rams official site actually has a nice intro page right now on the Deacon, with soul music of the era and all. ;)...
                            -09-23-2009, 05:41 AM
                          • Varg6
                            RIP Heath Ledger
                            by Varg6
                            Heath Ledger, age 28...found dead.

                            Actor Heath Ledger dies at 28 -

                            Poor guy, I really feel bad...He looked amazing as the Joker too.
                            -01-22-2008, 03:50 PM