No announcement yet.

2004 potential running back busts

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 2004 potential running back busts

    By Greg Kellogg, Special to

    When predicting boom-or-bust players, one has to look not only at the player, but at the team surrounding him. It is usually his supporting cast that will contribute to the surge or drop in production that dictates which players are which.

    This article will focus on bust players. But first, let's discuss what exactly constitutes a bust.

    First, any player who is injured is not a bust. Injuries are unpredictable. Some players seem to be more inclined to suffer injuries -- many remember ex-Minnesota Vikings RB Robert Smith. But Smith concluded his career with a season in which he started all 16 games and totaled over 1,800 yards. He also scored 10 TDs in what was his only season in which he didn't miss at least two games.

    One might assume Marshall Faulk will miss games due to injury in 2004. After all, he's missed some in each of his last four seasons and didn't dress for five games last year. But you can never be sure.

    So while you should take injuries into account, your assumptions should not be based solely on this one factor.

    A bust is a player who performs significantly below what one can reasonably expect to be his draft ranking by position. Since every draft is different, that could mean that a player taken in the late second round could be a sleeper or boom player.

    I was in a recent draft in which 19 of the first 24 picks were running backs. In this draft, Michael Bennett was the 25th player taken, but he was also the 20th running back taken. If he finishes 2004 in the top 10 running backs, then he will have played significantly better than projected.

    An understanding of the Average Value Theory will help in making these determinations. The chart below shows how each of the top 32 slotted running backs has performed using WCOFF scoring. In other words, the fourth ranked running back has averaged 323.4 points over the past three seasons. The 16th ranked back has averaged 220.8. (There are no names associated with these slots because the players that filled them are not consistent from year to year.)

    The next step is to determine which players should fill which slots. I am using a list generated at from drafts, both real and mock, done over the past two months. This gives me a fairly large sample and should give a reasonable expectation of where individual running backs are being drafted. One thing to remember is that I am not so concerned with what round these players are being taken. I am only concerned with what rank they hold among other running backs.

    I will also provide a list based on the current Fantasy Asylum Composite rankings as of this writing. This will give you some differences but will hopefully add to the overall quality of this analysis.

    One thing that will not be considered is what round the player will likely be drafted. This is because some drafts are very running back heavy while others seem to concentrate on quarterbacks. In a 12-team draft, you are likely to see 50-60 running backs selected. If the 24th running back taken happens to be selected in the sixth round, but performs in the 50-60 range, is he more of a bust than the 23rd running back taken who was picked in the third round and finishes as the 30th best back?

    Because every draft is different, it is difficult to figure out how much weight to apply to draft position. For one thing there is no magic formula that says the 15th-ranked running back will be taken in the fourth round. So for this article, I am going to list the average score made by the top 32 running backs, assign names to those slots based on drafts that have already taken place, and then study the situations of the players listed and provide my analysis to you. You will be able to take this and apply where you think the player will be drafted to determine how much of a risk you assign to the individual when you make your draft list.

    Ricky Williams, Miami Dolphins (MFL Rank 7th, FA Rank 8th, 282.5 - 295.6): He was a monster in his first season with the Dolphins. But in his second season he suffered a 24 percent drop in yardage and a 41 percent decline in TDs.

    To add insult to injury, he has lost five offensive linemen (four starters), his starting fullback, and offensive coordinator Norv Turner, the man behind the discovery of a running game in Miami. Let us not forget how long the Dolphins struggled to find a running game before Turner and Williams arrived.

    The quarterback position is in flux, but the addition of A.J. Feeley and WR David Boston shows that Miami is trying to upgrade the passing game. With the changes in place on the offensive line, this may be the part of the offense that gets the most attention all year.

    Williams has had 1,245 touches (carries and receptions) over the past three years. That kind of wear and tear will eventually wear a body down. Williams averaged less than 4.0 yards per carry in all but three of his 2003 games. He was under 3.0 ypc in five games. With a new line in place, these could seem to be good numbers.

    Kevan Barlow, San Francisco *****, (MFL 12, FA 14, 230.7 - 243.9): He has been champing at the bit to become the starter for three years. In 2004, he will get his chance. He reported to camp in what coaches called "the best shape of his career." But he will be on a team that was decimated in the offseason.

    Gone are starting QB Jeff Garcia, superstar WR Terrell Owens and locker room leader RB Garrison Hearst, although the loss of Hearst actually plays in Barlow's favor. But also out the door are two starting offensive linemen (Ron Stone and Derrick Deese).

    Replacement QB Tim Rattay has already suffered a significant injury that has kept him out of preseason minicamps and is threatening his participation in training camp as well. That would leave untested Ken Dorsey under center. There are just too many questions surrounding this offense to expect Barlow to have a big season.

    Charlie Garner, Tampa Bay Buccaneers, (MFL 27, FA 28, 151.8 - 158.9): He was reunited with former his old Raiders coach Jon Gruden, prompting many to hand him the starting job. He may very well earn it, but it will have to be done on the field and that competition won't take place until training camp. Right now we know that his primary competition for the spot will come from last year's starter, Michael Pittman.

    Since Pittman's suspension is only three games, Tampa may hold on him. Also muddying the picture somewhat is the fact that Tampa brought in Antowain Smith for a tryout. Should they sign Smith, you can expect no Tampa running back to be worthwhile. Additionally, former Browns RB Jamel White is now a Buccaneer. White has gained 533 yards and scored five TDs on third down over the past three years, making him the consummate third-down player.

    Any player stuck in a running back by committee situation has to be an amazing athlete to be a worthy fantasy player, because their touches are going to be severely limited. Garner has never been a TD machine and if his touches are limited, so will be his yardage totals. And at 32, he is no spring chicken.

    Thomas Jones, Chicago Bears (MFL 26, FA 24, 161.9 - 176.7): The second running back selected and seventh overall pick by the Arizona Cardinals in the 2000 NFL Draft has been a spectacular failure.

    Then Jones found himself with the Bucs last year, and, due to injuries, even started three of the last four games. It was in these games that his stock once again rose to a level that a team was willing to take a chance on him. That team was the Chicago Bears who brought in a new head coach, Lovie Smith, to retool the Bears' offense.

    While I fully expect Smith to improve the woeful passing attack of recent years -- the addition through subtraction of Kordell Stewart ensures that -- I remain unconvinced Thomas Jones is the equivalent of Marshall Faulk or Priest Holmes at tailback.

    When I think of Jones in comparison to those two, I see an image of Dennis Hopper in a ratty old referee's uniform holding up one of Barry Sanders' shoes and saying "This is Barry Sanders' shoe, man -- he's scary." Jones is to Holmes/Faulk, as Hopper is to Sanders. Well, maybe not that bad - but close.

    Rudi Johnson, Cincinnati Bengals (MFL 17, FA 17, 217.7): He is all this year's rage, thanks to the the trade of Corey Dillon to New England. So why didn't the Bengals make a bigger effort to sign him to a long-term deal? And why did they draft rookie RB Chris Perry? Perhaps they are not as enamored with the kid as most of us in the fantasy world are.

    Cincinnati will be starting the equivalent of a rookie quarterback this season. Carson Palmer will have big days, make no mistake about that. The kid has a tremendous arm and will be a very good quarterback. Chad Johnson is a superstar in the making with the perfect attitude. Even Peter Warrick is showing signs of the talent that made him the fourth overall pick in the 2000 draft.

    With weapons like this surrounding him, you have to figure Johnson is in the perfect place. Remember, this is Cincinnati after all. The line is marginal at best, having lost three of their offensive guards from last season. And I can't shake the feeling that Perry, taken with the 26th overall pick in this year's draft, is going to get significant playing time.

    Stephen Davis, Carolina Panthers (MFL 15, FA 16, 220.8 - 227.2): I have to say I hate this choice. Stephen Davis is the perfect running back for the Carolina offensive system. He is a big, between-the-tackles type of runner who gets stronger as the game goes on. And he had a huge season in 2003.

    But he does have DeShaun Foster waiting in the wings and I still believe Foster has as much raw talent as any back taken in the 2002 draft, which included Clinton Portis. Reports out of Carolina indicate that Foster will get as much as 50 percent of the carries in 2004. While I don't believe that, I do think he will get considerably more than the 22 percent (113 carries) he got in 2003.

    Foster is more of a three-down threat than Davis, and with Davis turning 30 this year, Carolina has to start planning for a future without Davis. In the playoffs, Foster was even more impressive, gaining 231 yards and scoring two TDs in part-time duty.

    Michael Bennett, Minnesota Vikings (MFL 19, FA 18, 206.2 - 209.0): He is back from injury and slated to move back into the starting job. Two years ago, Bennett showed what he is capable of as a feature back, gaining over 1,600 total yards and scored six TDs.

    But last year, Bennett missed the first half of the season and then was eased back in, even though he started, when he returned. All told, Bennett only carried 15 or more times twice last year. In the meantime, Onterrio Smith averaged 5.4 yards per carry and scored five TDs with just three starts. You also have to consider Moe Williams, who will undoubtedly retain his third-down job after he totaled nearly 1,400 yards and scored eight TDs. Even during Bennett's breakout season in 2002, Williams stole over 600 yards and 11 TDs.

    There are just too many weapons to expect any one of them to have a breakout year. So while Bennett has world-class speed, the options available to the Vikings make him a prime suspect to under perform expectations.

    Travis Henry, Buffalo Bills (MFL 16, FA 15, 220.8 - 227.2): Much like the Stephen Davis, I hate putting a warrior like Travis Henry in a list like this. But one has to be honest when evaluating players, and Henry has a player who, were it not for a severe knee injury, should have been a top-five draft pick who will be pushing for time. Henry is the epitome of a throwback player -- the man played through a severe rib injury last year and still finished with over 1,500 yards and 11 total TDs.

    Willis McGahee has made it through every workout and has not been limited at all. Still, he faces his biggest challenge; the first hit on the knee that will assure him everything is OK. The Bills retained all but one starter on the offensive line, so the only concern facing Henry is how many carries he loses to McGahee.

    LaDainian Tomlinson, San Diego Chargers (MFL 1, FA 2, 385.4 - 434.5): I know what you are thinking. "You must be nuts, Kellogg! How can anyone think Tomlinson could be a bust?" Well, being a bust is related directly to what your expectations for Tomlinson are, and whether or not he can meet or exceed those expectations. Chances are they are pretty high for this kid. Understandably so, since all he has done in his three years as a pro is get better each season. Last season, Tomlinson put up 2,300-plus yards and scored 17 times.

    So what has changed to make me think he won't be worth one of the top two picks in this year's draft? The Chargers have lost nine offensive linemen in the offseason. A 10th, Toniu Fonoti, has entered a three-week weight-loss clinic because his weight has risen to nearly 400 pounds that caused him to miss a crucial mandatory mini-camp. OG Mike Goff sustained an abdomen strain that caused him to miss time at the same mini-camp, though he is expected to be ready for training camp. Finally, center Jason Ball is unhappy in San Diego and has asked for a trade.

    David Boston and Stephen Alexander are gone, and while they haven't been the superstars many thought they would be, they were legitimate threats when they were on the field. The Chargers will probably be starting a rookie quarterback as well. But the biggest offseason loss, in my mind, is punter Darren Bennett. This loss will affect the way the team calls plays on third down. When you know you have one of the top punters in the game, you are more likely to be conservative in your third down play calling.

    This is not to say that Tomlinson won't have a good year. I believe he will have a good year -- just not one worthy of being one of the top two picks in the draft.

    Priest Holmes, Kansas City Chiefs (MFL 2, FA 1, 385.4 - 434.5): OK, I concede I have Holmes ranked as my second-best running back. The thing to remember is that being a bust is based on one thing and one thing only -- failing to live up to preseason expectations. The expectations for Priest Holmes are so high he could conceivably finish as the second-best back and still be a bust.

    Over the past three seasons, the top-ranked running back has averaged 434.5 points per season in WCOFF scoring -- the second best runner has averaged just 385.4. So if you take Holmes with the first pick, and he finishes second, you are giving up (potentially) 49.1 points. That's a lot of jack to go missing.

    There have been two other running backs in the history of the NFL with two consecutive 20-plus TD seasons. In 1994 and 1995, Emmitt Smith had 22 and 25 total TDs, respectively. He also had 1,800-plus and 2,100-plus total yards in those two seasons. In 1996, his yardage fell to 1,400 and his TDs to 15 (three of them receiving). Good numbers, but a noticeable decline.

    Marshall Faulk had over 2,100 yards and 26 total TDs in 2000 and followed that up with 2,100-plus yards and 21 total TDs in 2001. In 2002, his numbers dipped to 1,400-plus yards and 10 total TDs. While past performance by other players is not a perfect indicator of future performance by others, it does show just how difficult it is to reach 20 total TDs in a season and how doing that in consecutive seasons can lead to a dip in production in the third season.

    So there you have it -- the top 10 players most likely to disappoint in 2004. While I do expect several of them to have good seasons, most notably the aforementioned Holmes, I do think most of them will fail to live up to their AVT expectations. My advice for this year, to those holding a top three pick, is to try to trade down to the middle of the first round and "settle" for a player like Deuce McAllister, Ahman Green or Clinton Portis, while improving your pick in the second and potentially other rounds.

    Greg Kellogg is a co-owner of the Fantasy Asylum and a member of the Professional Football Writers of America trade association. He has been writing about fantasy football on a national stage since 1996.

  • #2
    Re: 2004 potential running back busts

    So what has changed to make me think he won't be worth one of the top two picks in this year's draft? The Chargers have lost nine offensive linemen in the offseason.
    Wow, at first I did think this guy was nuts. But that is a huge factor, losing nine offensive lineman, I would not have thought it to be possible.

    Curly ~ Horns


    • #3
      Re: 2004 potential running back busts

      Originally posted by Ferter
      Wow, at first I did think this guy was nuts. But that is a huge factor, losing nine offensive lineman, I would not have thought it to be possible.

      LT's situation reminds me of Corey Dillon's career with the Bengals. He has a horrible supporting cast but somehow still manages to produce - his stats have actually improved every year. However, with the current state of the Chargers' O-Line, he will be inconsistent and I consider him a risky pick, as tempting as it might be to draft him.


      Related Topics


      • evil disco man
        Best RB Packages
        by evil disco man
        Hail Green Bay! Packers backs are NFL's best

        by Adrian Hasenmayer -

        For you football cliché lovers out there, I bet you have heard this beauty more times than J-Lo's gotten hitched:

        "If you want to win football games, you must be able to run the ball."

        The lack of creative expression aside, an effective running game accomplishes an array of critical team-building goals for any offense.

        Confidence on offense: Any time an offensive line can string 4-5 straight running plays and get some licks on opposing D-linemen, you can feel that momentum building.

        Save that defense: When the running game's clicking, a huge not-so-fringe benefit is the D getting a blow while also keeping other potent offenses helpless on the sidelines picking their teeth.

        Clock killing: Most importantly, great running games are like great closers in baseball. Coming back all the time is not a recipe for success in any sport. The ability to finish a game with ease gives the offense a load of confidence, while the defense can relax knowing game preservation isn't solely on their shoulders.

        So which teams own the best RB groups for 2004? For the purposes of our rankings, the goal for every team is to find two, hopefully three, backs with plenty of game experience. A great starting RB alone is most important, but a lack of solid backups can mean a big drop. Big game production definitely helps, since it's all about winning. Also, this list is for the 2004 season. Future potential means next to nothing.

        And one more thing, fullbacks are not included.

        Ranking the RB Packages

        1. PACKERS
        Ahman Green
        Najeh Davenport
        Tony Fisher
        Dahrran Diedrick
        Walter Williams

        The NFL's top group sports one of football's best two runners in Ahman Green. But he'll get even more rest than last season not due to fading skills, but Davenport (420 yards, 5.5 yards/carry in 2003) allows the Pack to rest Green without sacrificing production. The 6-1, 245 pound backup enjoyed 2-3 normal series each game in '03 and his workload is expected to increase even more this year to keep Green fresh for the playoffs. Just in case, third-stringer Tony Fisher also plays well in Green Bay's straight ahead, inside running attack.

        2. CHIEFS
        Priest Holmes
        Larry Johnson
        Derrick Blaylock
        Henri Childs
        Jonathan Smith
        Ronnie Cruz

        Dick Vermeil's collection of RB talent could easily become the league's best if they can get second-year man Larry Johnson on the field more to spell the NFL's best all-around back, Priest Holmes. Easier said than done, as Holmes more than proved his worth last season by ripping off his third straight year of 2,000+ yards from scrimmage. Speaking of...
        -07-07-2004, 08:10 PM
      • RamsFan16
        Team Postion Rankings
        by RamsFan16
        Team DL rankings: Miami fourth
        Michael Harmon /
        Posted: 4 hours ago

        My off-season fantasy caravan rolls on.

        This week, I'm stepping across the line of scrimmage and giving further inspection to the defensive units. Offensive players are scrutinized with every throw, run and passing route completed. It's high time that the individual components of defenses get their just due.

        Today, I'm examining the defensive lines of each NFL team. In addition to the straight personnel, I'm also evaluating the fantasy contributions we can expect heading into 2006. For example, the Browns and Broncos slide in this form of evaluation. While both are successful at cutting down on total points allowed, their overall contribution in other defensive categories were lacking.

        The defending NFC champions rise to the head of the class. With a ballhawking defense and an offense that will apply pressure of its own, the Seattle Seahawks lead my list of defensive linemen.

        1. Seattle Seahawks
        The Seahawks led the NFL with 50 sacks in 2005. Bryce Fisher and Rocky Bernard combined for 17.5 of those sacks and accounted for 76 tackles. Grant Wistrom provided solid pressure off the other end with 52 tackles and four sacks of his own. Of chief import here was Wistrom's ability to stay healthy through the course of the year. Marcus Tubbs also supplemented the efforts of Chartric Darby and Bernard when he rotated into the game. Tubbs added 40 tackles and 5.5 sacks of his own. Seattle is primed for another run to the top of the fantasy stats with this nucleus returning intact.

        2. Atlanta Falcons
        John Abraham got his wish and exited the Jets this off-season. He now pairs with Patrick Kerney to form one of the most formidable defensive end combinations in the game. And when you add the pressure applied by tackle Rod Coleman (10.5 sacks), the Falcons figure to terrorize opposing quarterbacks throughout the fall. The Falcons will count on Coleman and Chad Lavalais to stuff the run better than they did in '05, when Atlanta ranked 26th in rushing defense at 128.9 yards per game.

        3. Carolina Panthers
        The Carolina Panthers remained among the top defenses in 2005 with great pressure off the edges from Julius Peppers and Mike Rucker. The duo combined for 18 sacks and 94 tackles to boost the Panthers to fifth in overall defense. Carolina received great play from Maake Kemoeatu on the interior. He stepped up in the absence of Kris Jenkins, who played in only one game last season. Kemoeatu and Jenkins will team to protect the middle of the line and keep Carolina's lofty ranking in run defense (fourth at 91.6 yards).

        4. Miami Dolphins
        The Dolphins ranked second in the NFL last season with 49 sacks and return all four members of their defensive line. Jason Taylor remains the leader of the unit, and posted another double-digit...
        -06-06-2006, 10:25 PM
      • Goldenfleece
        Over/Underrated Teams in the Preseason
        by Goldenfleece
        This time of year everybody can find reasons why their team is going to be a contender in the upcoming season, but I had some time on my hands, so I thought I'd take another look at a few of the teams with high expectations and see what they have really done to improve their teams in the offseason. Feel free to disagree; these are just one fan's opinions. I left the Rams off the underrated list because I've obviously got a bias there. So without further ado, here's my take on the most overrated/underrated teams in mid-August:

        Most Overrated:

        NY Giants

        Why they're hyped: The Giants have a Manning at the helm, and he's got weapons: Burress, Toomer, Shockey, and Barber. On defense, the team has some great pass rushers including Osi Umenyiora, Michael Strahan, and linebacker Lavar Arrington, along with first rounder Mathias Kiwanuka. Will Demps should be an upgrade at FS.

        Why they won't live up to it: First, the defense. They lost 2 defensive tackles in free agency. Clancy and Allen were not exactly worldbeaters at their position, but the Giants don't have proven talent to replace them. William Joseph started 10 games at the right DT spot and had 2 sacks; he's the pass-rushing DT. Looking at their roster, I can't figure out who is supposed to be starting next to him. Fred Robbins maybe? Robbins couldn't even hold down the backup job last season. At corner, they added Sam Madison but lost Will Allen who is not only younger but has also put up better numbers in recent years. It looks as though Will Peterson will be replaced on the other side by last year's nickelback, Corey Webster. Webster has shown some promise, but it's still his first year as a starter. Arrington has a reputation as a free lancer who gets out of position trying to make the big play; it has also been said he can't handle coverage responsibilities. The Giants should still be at least a little better at WLB and FS but worse at both DT spots and both corners.

        On offense, Eli looked worse towards the end of the season, throwing 4 TDs and 7 ints in 5 games in December. He looked shaky in the playoffs, too, throwing for a paltry 113 yards, 3 ints, and no TDs while taking 4 sacks and coughing up a fumble in a loss to the Panthers. Tiki on the other hand had a remarkable season, but age is a factor here. Take the example of Curtis Martin who led the league in rushing yards with 1,697 yards in 2004. Then he hit the wall. His rushing average the next season fell from 4.6 yards/carry to 3.3, and his rushing total was nearly a thousand yards less at 735. Maybe it'll happen this year, maybe it won't...but one of these days age is going to catch up with Barber, and when it does, it'll happen fast. It's probably not a good sign that he has talked about retiring after this season. Barber has said, "We'll see how my body holds up. Last year was a grind for me. Even though I played great, I battled to be healthy. We'll see...
        -08-16-2006, 06:05 AM
      • RamsFan4ever
        Fantasy Football 3 Round Mock Draft---Jackson 3rd Pick
        by RamsFan4ever

        One man's mock draft for 2007

        By Michael Fabiano Fantasy Expert

        (Jan. 4, 2007) -- The fantasy football season might last only a few short months, but there is no true offseason for those enthusiastic owners who live, eat and breathe the National Football League. In fact, some have already started to research and examine how drafts could look in 2007 (training camps are just six months away!)

        In an effort to feed that fantasy football fix all year round, we here at will run an updated three-round mock draft once a month throughout the offseason. Each numbered position represents an individual team, so no one team will select more than one quarterback, two running backs or two wide receivers.

        The draft is based on a standard scoring system that rewards one point for each 25 passing yards, 10 rushing and receiving yards and six points for all touchdowns. There are no points awarded for receptions.

        ROUND ONE
        1. LaDainian Tomlinson, RB, San Diego: Tomlinson was without question the MVP of fantasy football this season and will be the first overall selection in almost all 2007 drafts. He led the entire league with 1,815 rushing yards and scored an NFL record 31 touchdowns (33 total with his two touchdown passes included), and he will continue to be the centerpiece of the Chargers offense for head coach Marty Schottenheimer.

        2. Larry Johnson, RB, Kansas City: Johnson, who was the consensus No. 1 overall selection in this season's drafts, didn't disappoint with 2,199 all-purpose yards and 19 total touchdowns. The fact that he recorded an NFL single-season record 416 carries and should see at least 20-30 additional looks in the postseason is a bit of a concern, but it will still be hard for most owners to pass on this ultra-talented and versatile back.

        3. Steven Jackson, RB, St. Louis: Jackson broke out in his first season under head coach Scott Linehan with an impressive 2,334 all-purpose yards and 16 total touchdowns, so look for him to replace Shaun Alexander on the list of elite backs. The former Oregon State standout also recorded 90 receptions -- that's the most in the league for backs -- so he could be a better choice than Johnson in leagues that reward owners for catches.

        4. Frank Gore, RB, San Francisco: Gore, who was the top preseason sleeper on, broke out under the guidance of offensive coordinator Norv Turner with an NFC-high 1,695 rushing yards and nine total touchdowns. He also posted an additional 485 yards as a receiver out of the backfield in what became an improved Niners offense. Gore should continue to thrive under Turner -- his goal for 2007 is 2,200 yards.

        5. Peyton Manning, QB, Indianapolis: There will be at most three elite quarterbacks next season -- Manning,...
        -01-05-2007, 08:22 AM
      • A-Web
        RB Depth and the 35th Pick
        by A-Web
        Not that I believe we have a bad running game. Obviously when Jackson is healthy it is one of the most dangerous in the league. Well, if our O-Line could produce for him. And I am sure they will in the near future.

        Anyways, I was just wondering, because I was browsing some mocks and found something interesting.

        In most mock drafts, it seems that there is only a single running back coming off the board in the first round. Knowshon Moreno. One draft, by Charles Davis of NFL.COM, whom I highly regard for his articles and opinions, had Knowshon as the only RB taken in round one. And the sad part was, he had him going to the Chargers. Recently, however, the Chargers have struck a deal with LT and now have both LT and Sproles in the bank. He has edited his post to

        "This could easily become LB Rey Maualuga, especially since L.T. just signed."

        So being that fact, it seems there is a potential major slide at RB like the WRs had last season. There may be none taken in the first round. If that is the case, and Knoshon Moreno doesn't go in the first, and Chris Wells doesn't go in the first, what happens to them then?

        Well I for one have watched both of the backs throughout their last season campaigns, and still cannot see how some people believe Knowshon is better than Chris Wells. Everybody claims that Wells has trouble with injuries, yet it was basically a single injury in his entire 3 years as the Running Back for the Buckeyes. Yes he had some on and off trouble with his ankle after that point, but that is what happens to everyone in the NFL too. When you are mid-season, and you are hurt, you have to try to recouperate while at the same, when you are healthy enough to go on any particular week, you go. Sometimes that causes some setbacks, but when your team needs you to perform you have to.

        Unlike the NFL where you can afford to have a couple losses, sometimes up to 8 in a really poor division (Chargers / Broncos / Arizona Cardinals), in NCAA football, a single loss can be the difference between being in the Big Game, and not being in the Big Game. So it makes sense that moreso than ever, you would not be able to sit on any given week because if your team loses because you didn't play, that's it. You just have to go out there, do your best, and hope it doesn't get aggrovated. Wells is healed up, showed amazing skill and ability in the combine and pro day, and is ready to roll.

        Not to take away from Knowshon Moreno. For a guy to come into the Georgia starting lineup after red-shirting his freshman year, he performed outstandingly. 1336/1400 being his two seasons total rushing yards, while averagine a 5.4/5.6 respectively. 30 TDs in 2 years is amazing, and add to that two reception touchdowns in his senior '08 season, and he can play from the backfield as receiver too. 253/392 yard seasons in receptions with an avg of 12.7/11.9. Something to note...
        Neither Running Back
        Moreno, and utilize split carries
        Wells, and utilize split carries
        Moreno as a pure backup
        Wells as a pure backup
        -03-15-2009, 07:22 AM