No announcement yet.

AHL approves rule changes, adds Des Moines

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AHL approves rule changes, adds Des Moines

    American Hockey League President and CEO David Andrews announced today that the league’s Board of Governors has approved, following an independent and thorough evaluation, a number of rule changes aimed at increasing the flow of the game and generating additional offensive opportunities. The changes were approved at the league’s Annual Meeting on Hilton Head Island, S.C., last week.

    Among the changes adopted are instituting no-touch icing and tag-up offsides; increasing the size of the neutral zone by moving the goal line and widening the blue lines and center red line; and restricting the maximum width of goaltenders’ pads. (See below for details on rule changes.)

    The Annual Meeting also resulted in the following announcements:

    The AHL has implemented a shootout to decide regular-season games which are tied after a five-minute overtime period. In the AHL standings, teams will receive two points for a win, one point for a loss in overtime or in a shootout and zero points for a loss in regulation time.

    The AHL has reduced the number of qualifying teams for the Calder Cup 2005 Playoffs to 16 (from 20). The format will still feature a divisional playoff, leading to conference finals and ultimately the Calder Cup Final. The top four teams from each division will qualify for the postseason, and all rounds will feature best-of-seven series.

    The Board approved the relocation of the inactive franchise owned by Howard Baldwin from Louisville, Ky., to Des Moines, Iowa, to begin play in 2005-06.

    The Board approved the transfer of ownership of the Norfolk Admirals from Mark Garcea and Page Johnson to a group led by the Norfolk Tides Baseball Club and its president, Ken Young.

    The Board approved the transfer of controlling interest in the Hamilton Bulldogs to Hamilton businessman Michael Andlauer, who had been a minority owner.



    The American Hockey League’s Board of Governors has approved the implementation of the following rule changes, effective beginning with the 2004-05 season:

    In a delayed offside situation, the offending player(s) will be permitted to negate the offside by “tagging up” with the blue line. This rule was in effect from 1986-96 and will enable more flow in the forechecking aspect of the game while reducing the number of stoppages.

    “Automatic icing” has been implemented, with icing infractions to be called and the play whistled dead when the puck crosses the goal line.

    Goal lines will be moved from 13 feet to 11 feet out from the end boards, and blue lines will be moved back accordingly to maintain a 60-foot attacking zone. This will increase the size of the neutral zone and reduce play behind the goals.

    The width of the blue lines and the center red line will be increased from 12 inches to 24 inches each, and passes will be permitted from the defensive edge of one blue line to the offensive edge of the other blue line, adding additional space to the neutral zone

    The maximum width of goaltenders’ leg pads will be reduced from 12 inches to 10 inches, creating additional scoring area for shooters.

    The AHL will also implement, for the first seven weeks of the 2004-05 regular season, a limited test of a rule restricting the areas where goaltenders may play the puck. This is a step designed to increase offensive opportunities without wholly eliminating a goaltender’s ability to assist his defensemen. Following the completion of the test period, the AHL will evaluate the results and determine whether the rule’s application will continue.


    Entering its 69th season this fall, the AHL serves as the top development league for all 30 National Hockey League teams. The 2003-04 season saw 28 teams compete for the coveted Calder Cup, and more than 6.6 million fans attending AHL games across North America for the third straight year. Over 80 percent of all players to compete in the NHL in 2003-04 were AHL graduates, and more than 400 players took the ice in both leagues.

Related Topics


  • Nick
    Robert Woods will switch to No. 2 'right away' if rule is approved
    by Nick
    This article is a couple of weeks old, but it is worth noting that the NFL owners approved allowing more players to wear single-digit numbers. Running backs, receivers, and tight ends can now wear numbers from 1-49 as well as 80–89. DBs can wear 1-49. It'll be interesting to see if Woods and/or Ramsey change jersey numbers, as well as anyone else....
    -04-29-2021, 03:36 PM
  • r8rh8rmike
    Tuck Rule Gone, Helmet Rule Approved
    by r8rh8rmike
    Tuck rule gone, helmet rule approved

    Updated: March 20, 2013, 3:14 PM ET
    By John Clayton and Adam Schefter |

    PHOENIX -- NFL owners went into a speed voting mode before concluding their winter meeting in Phoenix on Wednesday, voting to eliminate the tuck rule, penalize crown of the helmet hits by players who are outside of the tackle box or at least three yards downfield and change the replay challenge rule so that a bad coaches' challenge doesn't prevent officials from reviewing the play.

    The tuck rule change had only one dissenting vote, the Pittsburgh Steelers. The New England Patriots and Washington Redskins abstained, but the remaining 29 teams, including the Oakland Raiders, voted to end the rule, a call that cost the Raiders a chance to go to the Super Bowl in 2001.

    Tom Brady was the famous beneficiary of the rule in that 2001 playoff game between the Patriots and the Raiders. A ball that appeared to be a Brady fumble was ruled an incomplete pass, and the Patriots went on to win the game.

    Now, if a quarterback starts to bring the football back toward his body while trying to throw, it will be ruled a fumble instead of an incomplete pass.

    "We didn't think it was necessary to make that change," Steelers president Art Rooney said. "We were happy with the way it's been called."

    The Raiders celebrated the tuck rule's demise with a three-word tweet: "Adios, Tuck Rule."

    The most debate came with the crown of the helmet hits rule, which will affect running backs the most. As of Tuesday, the competition committee felt as though it was only one vote away from passing. After further discussion, the vote was 31-1 with the Cincinnati Bengals voting against.

    It will now be a 15-yard penalty if a player who is more than three yards downfield or outside of the tackle box delivers a blow with the crown of his helmet. If the offensive and defensive player each lowers his head and uses the crown of the helmet to make contact, each will be penalized.

    "It'll certainly make our runners aware of what we expect relative to use of the helmet," Cowboys owner Jerry Jones said. "One of the questions I ask a lot is who gains from this, offense or defense? And it's a toss-up as to which side of the ball has the advantage on this rule, if any. The main thing is it's pro-health and safety, and that's the big thing."

    The owners discussed simply using fines on ball carriers to eliminate the tactic but instead voted to make the rule change.

    "Jim Brown never lowered his head," Rooney said with a smile. "It can be done."

    Chicago Bears running back Matt Forte, who called rule proposal "absurd" Sunday on Twitter, reacted to the rule's adoption with similar disdain in a series of tweets Wednesday....
    -03-20-2013, 01:21 PM
  • Nick
    NFL adding full time officials in 2017
    by Nick
    Full-Time Officials: The NFL Finally Makes the Move
    The league and the officials’ union have approved full-time officials for the 2017 season, at least one for each of the seven positions on each crew. Big question: Will it improve the overall performance of the zebras?
    35 minutes ago

    The NFL is getting its wish—and full-time officiating positions are coming to the league.

    The NFLRA, the officials’ union, approved a plan on Wednesday for the implementation of 21 to 24 full-time officials, three sources said. Under the plan, each of the seven field officiating positions will be represented, with no more than five coming from one position.

    The plan was jointly negotiated by the league and union, with the emphasis on improving the state of officiating across the board. An announcement is expected later on Wednesday.

    The full-time officials will come from the current roster of 124 game officials. Also, the full-time officials will be permitted to have outside employment.

    During the 2012 CBA negotiations, the league and NFLRA agreed to experiment with full-time officials. The main concern from officials was that the pool would be cut down, with some officials choosing their full-time jobs over their football jobs.
    -08-09-2017, 12:06 PM
  • AlphaRam
    United Football League
    by AlphaRam
    The UFL kicked off last night as the Las Vegas Locomotives won the inaugural UFL game against the California Redwoods. Las Vegas quarterback J.P. Losman picked apart the Redwoods defense on way to 30-17 victory.

    The UFL initially had plans to start with eight teams playing in targeted sites in the fall of 2008, but started with four. A friend of mine that was on the Steelers last year is playing for the Las Vegas Locomotives.

    From Wikipedia:
    The league had identified approximately 21 cities with strong economic bases, passionate football tradition, and a high number of average TV viewing households as potential team locations. Target markets included: Austin, Birmingham, Columbus, Hartford, Las Vegas, London (England), Los Angeles, Louisville, Memphis, Mexico City (Mexico), Milwaukee, Monterrey (Mexico), New York City, Oklahoma City, Orlando, Portland, Raleigh-Durham, Sacramento, Salt Lake City, San Antonio, and San Jose.[7]

    The league began its premiere season on October 8, 2009, playing games on Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday evenings, with the first regular season game held on October 8 and the championship game on Thanksgiving weekend. Both the inaugural game and the championship will be held in Las Vegas.

    Like previous football leagues, the UFL has instituted several mostly minor rules changes that will differ from the NFL's rules. Though the league has indicated it would mostly adhere to standard rules, there are a few differences, as follows:

    No Tuck Rule - The Tuck rule is one of the most controversial rules in the NFL. In the NFL, if a passer brings his arm forward in a passing motion and then loses possession of the ball as he is attempting to tuck it back toward his body, it's considered a forward pass (and thus an incomplete pass if the ball hits the ground). In the UFL, it would be called a fumble either way.

    Touchdown celebrations - Celebrations, individual or group, will only take place in the endzones and on the bench area.

    Fumbling out of the endzones - If the ball is fumbled out of the endzone, it will be placed back at the spot of the fumble, pending which team last had possession.

    Intentional grounding - A quarterback is allowed to intentionally ground the ball anywhere behind the line of scrimmage if he is under pressure.

    Instant replay - All reviews will be viewed upstairs by the replay official and he will only have 90 seconds for review.

    Overtime - Both teams will be guaranteed at least one possession. When a team scores, the other team will get a last chance to score on the next drive. Similar to the College football rule.

    Officials - instead of the traditional black-and-white uniforms, UFL referees wear a red polo shirt with black pants.

    Play Clock - While the NFL has a 40 second play clock, the UFL has a 25 second play...
    -10-09-2009, 03:55 AM
  • Guest's Avatar
    The Rams and the NFL, What to do?
    by Guest
    I think we should consider what the NFL wants, as opposed to who will buy the Rams and where they will be located. I have mentioned on here before that I read the NFL wants to have a Super Bowl in L. A. to commerate Super Bowl 1, on the 50th anniversary. ( I believe it was the L. A. Times a few months back.) The sale of the team has to be approved by the league. The relocation if any has to be approved by the league. The acceptance of a new owner has to be approved by the league.

    The NFL is in control here. I took into consideration that and the league wants football back in L. A. and they plan to host SuperBowl 50 there.

    If you were the NFL and Roski has the land and an approved enviromental report, with little or no taxpayer dollars, it would seem behind the scenes with the NFL, things are probably looking pretty good at this point. The television revenues and or an upcoming contract for those revenues might be another factor. L. A. is thier 2nd largest market.

    I then took into consideration that the possibility of a brand new outdoor stadium could be built and ready to play in for SUPERBOWL 50, might be really hard for the league to pass up. How exciting would it be for the league to have a triumphant return to L. A. with the Rams returning home and the league hosting it's first SuperBowl in 15 or 20 yrs in LOS ANGELES?

    I believe that now that the Rams are in play, the NFL has to be looking at this carefully after all the Rams were here in L. A. for 49 yrs, I'll say it again 49 yrs, and as others have mentioned still have an existing fan base. The NFL never wanted the Rams to move in the first place.

    Then as we all know Chip opened the door to the highest bidder after expressing he wanted to keep the Rams in St Louis if he could.

    Then you can take into consideration the Rams are in the NFC west, how many other things are coming together.

    I think so many things make sense here. THE STARS ARE ALIGNING PERFECTLY!!

    I think there's way more at work here than just the Rams situation.

    I never would have guessed that Georgia's passing might have facilitated the Rams return to L. A.

    Ljsrams aka Les
    -01-28-2010, 05:40 PM