Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Kobe comparable to Jordan? Please.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Kobe comparable to Jordan? Please.

    Sportswriters are very bad historians. The latest example it the trend to start discussions of the upcoming NBA Finals by posing the question: "if Kobe wins another title or two, does that put him in the same sentence as Michael Jordan?"

    Are you kidding me?

    Let's look at a few facts, shall we?

    Jordan played in six Championship Series, winning all six. He was the MVP of... you guessed it... all six.

    Kobe has played in four Championship series, winning three. He was the MVP of... you guessed it... none of them. In fact, Kobe hasn't played all that well in the finals, with a shooting % hovering around .400. In the three series he won, he was essentially carried by Shaq (who, of course, was the MVP of all three).

    Looking at the playoffs as a whole, Michael played in 179 playoff games (would have been more had he not taken his baseball hiatus in his prime), and averaged 33.4 points (shooting % of .487), 6.4 rebounds and 5.7 assists.

    Kobe has played in 146 playoff game, averaging 24.2 points (shooting % of .447), 5.1 rebounds and 4.6 assists.

    Jordan was the best of all time. Kobe does not need to be comparable to Jordan to be an all time great. The problem is, sportswriters always want to act like they are watching something that has never been seen before.

    They aren't.

  • #2
    Re: Kobe comparable to Jordan? Please.

    Kobe was real young his first stint in the NBA Finals, Jordan was a seasoned vet. Jordon had Pippen, Paxson, Kerr, Rodman, Horry, Cartwright....Kobe had Shaq and well....Shaq. Now it's Kobe and the rest.

    Kobe and Jordon were both excellent defenders. I think Kobe right now is just as good as Jordon was and maybe better with the cast that is around him and the cast that was around Jordon.

    I will say this, if either one of them had the ball for my team to make the winning shot.....I wouldn't mind.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Kobe comparable to Jordan? Please.

      Ok, lets forget about all the championships, playoff appearances, and mvp's, becauce after all, these two wouldn't be able to do all that by themselves.

      Look at it like this. Who would win in a pick-up 1v1 game, with both in their prime. I dont think Jordan would completely dominate Kobe, it would be a close game. That's why they are comparable, because of what they can do without teammate help (drive, jump shot, defend etc.) When Kobe retires, then we can talk about whos the better player. That's fair enough.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Kobe comparable to Jordan? Please.

        After reading Phil Jackson's book that covered the KOBE vs SHAQ years, I was down on KOBE big time. He was acting like a spoiled brat during that time. I have to admit I'm back on the KOBE bandwagon after seeing how he has matured and led this seasons edition of the LOS ANGELES LAKERS.

        Is he as good or better than Michael Jordan? Only time will tell. A Lakers NBA Title this season without SHAQ will speak volumes for KOBE.
        sigpic :ram::helmet:

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Kobe comparable to Jordan? Please.

          Ugh.

          I guess I should not be surprised how people have bought into the hype.

          First of all, the Lakers Championship teams had plenty of quality role players, including Rick Fox, A.C. Green, Glenn Rice, Robert Horry, Ron Harper, Brian Shaw and Derrick Fisher. No matter how you slice it, though, it was Shaq who carried those teams to championships.

          As for who would win a one on one game... who cares? That would be like saying that Trung Canidate was better than Marshall Faulk because he could be him in a 40 yard race.

          The question is who was a better player. Michael was the best I've ever seen (and I've been watching NBA basketball since the late 70s). Magic would be next on the list. Kobe's not even in that discussion.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Kobe comparable to Jordan? Please.

            Jordon is the standard, Kobe is being measured UP to Jordan. Jordon is better in every measurable. Making this comparison is a reach, even if it's premised on Kobe winning a few more titles. I suppose if the Lakers with Kobe win 3 or 4 more titles and his numbers continue to be off the charts, he could certainly be in a situation where you could "put him in the same sentence as Michael Jordan", but that is light years away at this point.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Kobe comparable to Jordan? Please.

              Originally posted by AvengerRam View Post
              Ugh.

              As for who would win a one on one game... who cares? That would be like saying that Trung Canidate was better than Marshall Faulk because he could be him in a 40 yard race.

              The question is who was a better player.
              How does a 1v1 not show who is the better player? A 40 yd dash race would be like a 3pt shot contest.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Kobe comparable to Jordan? Please.

                Let's be fair. Look at the team Jordan got to play with compared to Kobe. Jordan had a better supporting cast (both in starters and bench) in his championship years, and the MVP was simply a lust thing. He was anointed God by the east coast biased writers. So was Shaq, even though his accomplishments were significantly less. Kobe can't launch from the free throw line and dunk like Jordan (the trade mark and source of mythical prowess), but he can literally take over a game in more dramatic fashion than Jordan ever did. Kobe is much more versatile and dynamic. Unfortunately, Kobe had to overcome the doubters of a high school player making it in the NBA, and later dealing with the speculators that it was on Shaq's back that won the championship. The truth be told though, Labron James has the potential to out shine them all.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Kobe comparable to Jordan? Please.

                  Originally posted by bigredman View Post
                  Let's be fair. Look at the team Jordan got to play with compared to Kobe. Jordan had a better supporting cast (both in starters and bench) in his championship years, and the MVP was simply a lust thing. He was anointed God by the east coast biased writers. So was Shaq, even though his accomplishments were significantly less. Kobe can't launch from the free throw line and dunk like Jordan (the trade mark and source of mythical prowess), but he can literally take over a game in more dramatic fashion than Jordan ever did.
                  Kobe certainly didn't take over the game in dramatic fashion tonight. 9 for 26 is nowhere near Jordanesque and his performance in crunch time was abysmal. Good thing this was only game 1.

                  As far as the argument that Kobe didn't have the talent around him that Jordan did, I don't buy it. The talent was comparable, bottom line.
                  Last edited by r8rh8rmike; -06-05-2008, 10:54 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Kobe comparable to Jordan? Please.

                    Originally posted by eric2810 View Post
                    How does a 1v1 not show who is the better player?
                    Because the game played in the NBA is 5 on 5. That means the game involves passing, moving without the ball, setting and using screens, team defense, rebounding in a crowd, and a lot of other skills and abilities that are not present in 1 on 1.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Kobe comparable to Jordan? Please.

                      Originally posted by r8rh8rmike View Post
                      Kobe certainly didn't take over the game in dramatic fashion tonight. 9 for 26 is nowhere near Jordanesque and his performance in crunch time was abysmal. Good thing this was only game 1.

                      As far as the argument that Kobe didn't have the talent around him that Jordan did, I don't buy it. The talent was comparable, bottom line.
                      Oh yeah? Yo Mama!
                      ;)

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Kobe comparable to Jordan? Please.

                        Originally posted by AvengerRam View Post
                        Because the game played in the NBA is 5 on 5. That means the game involves passing, moving without the ball, setting and using screens, team defense, rebounding in a crowd, and a lot of other skills and abilities that are not present in 1 on 1.
                        Kobe can be as effective as Jordan in all those aspects of the game. That certainly makes him comparable to Jordan as a player.
                        Last edited by eric2810; -06-10-2008, 08:38 PM.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Kobe comparable to Jordan? Please.

                          Kobe will never be Jordan because he'll never have the impact Jordan did on the sport. Bryant is a guy who can do an incredible amount on his own, but as of right now, it wouldn't be a debate about which one of them was better. In fact, the question sort of makes the point itself. Right now are asking whether they're comparable, not whether Kobe might be better.

                          If we talk about LeBron or any other rising star, we'd compare him to Kobe as a contemporary or a rival but not as the standard. Jordan is the standard. If you want to talk about the team Jordan played with, that's relevant, too, because Jordan actually could play with a team. With Kobe, it seems like there's always a conflict. This year is noteworthy simply because the team actually seems to be getting along.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Kobe comparable to Jordan? Please.

                            Originally posted by bigredman View Post
                            Oh yeah? Yo Mama!;)
                            Ah Celtic fans. How'd you like the game tonight Randy?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Kobe comparable to Jordan? Please.

                              I agree with Avenger, Fleece, and r8rh8rmike on this one. People cannot simply throw around the fact that "Jordan had better teams" and such. The Lakers had a very talented team who could not execute in the finals this year. The Lakers blew game 4 after a 21 point lead on the Celtics which is embarrassing and reflective on Kobe; if he really was a Jordan type player, he wouldn't let a game like that get out of hand and blow those kinds of leads. This was something Jordan never did. He still has the monster numbers, even with the amazing supporting cast he had. Jordan can't be blamed for having a great team. As for the argument that the MVP award was a bit of "lust", I believe 6/6 finals MVP awards has to be reflective on Jordan's performance. In the end Kobe wasn't able to carry his team. He's a great player, one of the all time greatest, but he can't be thrown out and compared to Jordan, just because he is the present standard.

                              Comment

                              Related Topics

                              Collapse

                              • bruce4life
                                lakers weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
                                by bruce4life
                                weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee SHAQ TELL ME HOW KOBE'S ASSS TASTES!!!
                                -06-15-2009, 11:49 AM
                              • AvengerRam_old
                                The New Lakers, and 10 Reasons they won't beat the Heat.
                                by AvengerRam_old
                                Lakers fans everywhere are celebrating their Summer moves that have brought them Steve Nash and Dwight Howard. But will they be able to unseat the Miami Heat as NBA Champs?

                                Here are 10 reasons why they won't.

                                1. The Oklahoma City Thunder
                                I don't think the Lakers will be able to get past OKC. Look at the match-ups. Howard and Gasol can be kept in check by Perkins and Ibaka. Durant will torch MWP or whoever else has the burden of trying to guard him. Kobe will score, but he'll have to work for it matching up with Sefolosha and Harden. And does anyone want to rely on Steve Nash to guard Russell Westbrook? I'd put good money on a Thunder vs. Heat rematch.

                                2. Teams are not made overnight.
                                When Miami signed their big 3, everyone thought they had the best team "on paper." But it takes a while for players to learn to play together. It will be no different for the Lakers.

                                3. Kobe and Nash are not a good combination.
                                Steve Nash is at his best when he has the ball in his hand and runs the pick-and-roll. Does anyone think Kobe Bryant is just going to wait around on the wing while Nash runs the show? Mark my words. Kobe will be the primary ballhandler, and Nash will be relegated to the role of a spot-up shooter. While Nash can be effective in that role, that's not what made him a 2 time MVP.

                                4. Age matters.
                                With the exception of Howard, all of the Lakers best 6 players (including Antawn Jamison) are North of 32 years of age. If you don't think that matters, look at what happened to the Spurs in each of the last two years in the playoffs.

                                5. Howard's foul shooting.
                                When the Lakers had Shaq, his foul shooting issues didn't hurt them because they were so much better than any team in the league. This Lakers team, on the other hand, can't afford to rely on a 50% foul shooter in crunch time.

                                6. The bench.
                                The Lakers bench, apart from Jamison, is made up primarily of journeymen. Compare that to a Heat bench that has Udonis Haslem, Ray Allen, Rashard Lewis and Mike Miller.

                                7. Three point shooting.
                                The Lakers three point options are limited. Kobe is inconsistent. So is MWP. The bench does not have any prolific shooters. Nash is their only consistent option.

                                8. Foul Trouble.
                                The Heat are very good at getting opposing big men in foul trouble. With Steve Nash offering little resistance to quicker players like Mario Chalmers and Norris Cole (not to mention the big 3 attacking the basket), Howard could find himself sitting through a lot of a Heat/Lakers series.

                                9. Dwyane Wade.
                                Wade fought through injuries throughout the playoffs last year, and still put up very solid numbers. At the same time, because he was not 100%, some people seem to have forgotten just how good he is. When healthy - and Wade should be healthy this year after sitting out the Olympics to have a clean-up procedure...
                                -08-16-2012, 08:09 AM
                              • RamsFan16
                                Daily Dime: How the Lakers can stun Suns
                                by RamsFan16
                                How the Lakers can stun Suns
                                By Greg Anthony
                                ESPN Insider

                                All of the playoff teams are now set. Sacramento, Chicago, the Los Angeles Lakers and Sacramento, welcome to the party. With three nights of regular season action left, some matchups won't be set until the final game Wednesday night.

                                Among the pairings that are almost nailed down, I think the likely Western Conference No. 7 seed Lakers are going to have a really good chance in the series with the No. 2 Suns. That's based on more than just Kobe Bryant and Co. looking very good against a Phoenix team Sunday playing without Steve Nash, Raja Bell and much motivation. But this win still means something to the Lakers, because they dominated the game.

                                Now if the Kings (43-38) beat Seattle at home on Tuesday, and the Lakers (44-37) lose at home Wednesday to the Hornets, then Sacramento would slide up to the No. 7 seed by virtue of superior division record tiebreakers. But the Lakers control their destiny.

                                If and when the Suns and Lakers meet again, here's how I think the Lakers can win. There's a formula that you have to implement against Phoenix, and it requires discipline. It's about controlling tempo.

                                So this is where a coach like Phil Jackson earns his money.

                                I liken the Suns to a run-and-shoot team in football. And the way to combat that approach is with a running game in football -- in basketball you stop them by dominating the paint. That slows the tempo down.

                                On this Shaq-less team, Lamar Odom and Kobe Bryant have to be the ones doing the damage in the paint. They can't settle for jumpers every time.

                                A successful post game demands a double team, and that brings extra help below the free-throw line. This would give the Lakers' defense that much more time to get back in transition. The Lakers have to do that. Phoenix excels at shooting the 3 in transition.

                                The Lakers have a good chance in a seven-game series. The Lakers have an opportunity to come in riding a five-game win streak, playing the best hoop in their division.

                                I think it's going to be a very interesting series because the Lakers are a better basketball team than they were in the first half. I don't think Phoenix is playing as well as it did in the first half. This makes for a very compelling series. The key for the Lakers will be winning one of those first two games in Phoenix.

                                Elsewhere, a team that clinched Sunday but is still likely to be in full playoff-drive mode is the Wizards (40-40), who beat potential first-round foe Cleveland. The Wiz are in a good position in that they are still motivated to keep the No. 5 seed and a matchup with the Cavs.

                                So even though Washington is in, the game Tuesday against the Bucks holds seeding implications. Cleveland is the worst of the top four and the team the Wiz have the best chance of beating. The...
                                -04-17-2006, 01:11 AM
                              • AvengerRam_old
                                Man, Kobe has chutzpah!!!!!!!!!
                                by AvengerRam_old
                                Let me make sure I'm clear on this...

                                Kobe Bryant is now taking public shots at Karl Malone for allegedly making a pass at Kobe's wife...

                                This is the same Kobe Bryant who recently admitted having sex with a hotel worker (you know, the one who claims he raped her)...

                                Okay, Kobe...

                                Karl making suggestive comments (allegedly) to your wife... bad.
                                You boning random women while your wife is home with your kid...okay.

                                Boy, if Karma exists, Kobe's going to come back in his next life as a dung beetle with an overdeveloped sense of smell and a feces aversion.
                                -12-13-2004, 06:51 AM
                              • laram0
                                L. A. Lakers
                                by laram0
                                I don't get to see much of the Lakers out here in Mass.. How do they look??

                                Make a splash in the playoffs or what?

                                How's this kid Bynum look?


                                I am overly excited that the Boston Celtics have lost 14 in a row!
                                -02-07-2007, 10:26 AM
                              Working...
                              X