Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Legalizing Sports Gambling Is Smartest Bet Yet

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Legalizing Sports Gambling Is Smartest Bet Yet

    Legalizing sports gambling is smartest bet yet

    By Dan Wetzel | Yahoo! Sports
    May 25, 2012

    In the United States of America, it is illegal for a mathematician to sit in his home, fire up his computer and employ his analytical skills in a game of online poker for money. Politicians say the reason is something about protecting him from the ills of gaming or some other nonsense.

    Of course, he can go down to the bar, get bombed and blow his life savings on endless games of mindless keno.

    The gambling laws of this country have never made any sense. They are a confused maze of miscast morality, government money grabs and special-interest favoritism.

    In the case of sports wagering, where the majority of profits in the estimated $350 billion industry go to offshore operations and organized crime, the laws are pure, unadulterated stupidity.

    Gov. Chris Christie expects legal action but also expects "to be successful." (AP)Chris Christie, the governor of New Jersey, on Thursday decided to make the boldest move yet on legalizing sports gambling in his state (and eventually all states who so chose) by daring the federal government, in the run-up to a presidential election no less, to argue otherwise.

    Christie plans to enact a state regulation passed in January that will allow wagering on all sports at New Jersey horse tracks and Atlantic City casinos this fall. It’s a move that defies the 1992 federal Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act, which allows sports betting in just four states, with Nevada the only one fully embracing it. Even Indian casinos are prohibited by law from operating sports books.

    If the feds want to come after him, well, Christie essentially said, “See you in court.” Otherwise, anyone may be able to bet legally on football in a Jersey sports book by October.

    “If someone wants to stop us, then let them try to stop us,” Christie said at a press conference in Atlantic City on Thursday.

    “Am I expecting there may be legal action taken against us to try to prevent it? Yes,” Christie continued. “But I have every confidence we’re going to be successful.”

    The court of law is one thing. The court of public opinion is another and Christie may be assuming the Justice Department won’t even attempt to fight this one. Let the presidential candidates take it on.

    We’ll leave the debates about legalizing marijuana and prostitution to others. When it comes to sports wagering, criminalization is hypocritical, counterproductive and thoroughly unenforceable.

    It is profoundly simple to illegally bet on sports. For well over a century the public has been wagering on football and boxing and basketball and every other sport. It used be through a local bookie. Of late, it’s become just easier through international online gambling sites, where even basic age limits can be ignored and credit cards provide deep reservoirs of cash for additional bets.

    The result is a massive industry, hidden right there in the open with point spreads printed in newspapers, gambling notes sitting out on the bar during NFL Sundays and free discussions in nearly every social circle about parlays, home dogs and prop bets.

    Yet outside of Nevada, none of it is taxed, not the winnings of the public or the books. None of it is remotely regulated. None of the money flow can be traced, which increases criminal behavior and the likelihood of compromised competition because it’s generally not a bunch of church ladies who back up bookies.

    And let’s not give credence to the absurd shrieking of the NFL, NCAA and other sports organizations who claim that bringing sports wagering into the light will somehow now draw in a criminal element, or that it might diminish their sports' popularity when their sports' popularity was partly built on gambling in the first place. The idea of Vegas-style sports books coming to towns across the country makes football weekends even more enticing.

    Generally, the best asset law enforcement has in uncovering a point-shaving scheme is a move in the very public Vegas line. That’s a luxury they don’t enjoy on the street wagering everywhere else. Las Vegas has always wanted a square game. Atlantic City will, too.

    Besides, if sports wagering is so, so, so bad, then why is it allowed in even one state? What’s so special about Nevada?

    “To those with a vested interest in the status quo – the professional sports organizations who take a hypocritical stance that wagering will ruin the purity of the game and the Nevada-based conglomerates that have enjoyed that state’s stranglehold on sports wagering for the last 20 years, I respectfully say, ‘Bring it on,’ ” New Jersey state senator Raymond Lesniak said in a statement.

    “The sooner you can make an issue of New Jersey’s noncompliance with an unconstitutional federal ban, the sooner we can defeat that ban in the courts and put New Jersey on the same competitive footing."

    Christie and Lesniak are politicians, and their motivation lies with trying to jumpstart the struggling casino industry in Atlantic City. That aside, they are in the right.

    Gambling in all forms has exploded across the country the last few decades, and it is time to end the strange hodgepodge of favoritism and situational Puritanism.

    There are lotteries everywhere, blackjack tables everywhere, games of chance everywhere, bingo everywhere. Everything is everywhere. To be able to blindly pull on a slot machine but not use analytical skills in online poker or sports wagering is ridiculous.

    If the motivation for additional tax revenue has legalized the most zombie-like forms of gambling, then let it do the same for the higher-end stuff.

    Legalizing sports books also recognizes reality. The NFL and the others may want to pretend they are outraged over wagering, but with the advent of smart phones, bets are placed today via online services or personal bookies right from stadium seats, even more convenient than a betting window at a horse track. Of course, in the old days they set up banks of pay phones on the concourse, and not everyone was using them to call home and check in with the wife.

    College sports teams often feature 50-50 raffles inside the stadium. Professional sports organizations sponsor state lottery scratch tickets. Events are held in casinos, and some team owners are in the gaming business.

    Sports bets are happening in the hundreds of billions each and every year. Any argument that it can be stopped, any argument that it is ruining competition, any argument that it is somehow reprehensible and dangerous and dirty (except in Nevada) can’t stand up to reality.

    The ban is senseless, aiding only criminals and Cayman Island entrepreneurs who have profited in our government’s stupidity.

    No time like the present to get smart and get real and end this charade.

  • #2
    Re: Legalizing Sports Gambling Is Smartest Bet Yet

    I'm not much of a gambler but it would be nice to have the ability to bet on NFL games legally. Especially the playoffs and Superbowl.
    sigpic :ram::helmet:

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Legalizing Sports Gambling Is Smartest Bet Yet

      Originally posted by laram0 View Post
      I'm not much of a gambler but it would be nice to have the ability to bet on NFL games legally. Especially the playoffs and Superbowl.
      I'm sure you're not alone. This situation is absolutely ridiculous.

      Comment


      • #4
        It is amazing. As popular as the NFL is, inherently and rightfully so, it would not be anywhere near as popular without sports betting.
        Walk into any book pre- and/or post- NFL season, and you can see it.
        The ONLY reason the NFL maintains its present stance is because they are not getting a piece of the action.
        This will change.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Legalizing Sports Gambling Is Smartest Bet Yet

          exactly. just discussing the lines is such a fun conversation. regardless of winning or losing money

          Comment

          Related Topics

          Collapse

          • AvengerRam_old
            5 Sports That Need To Be Retired
            by AvengerRam_old
            1. Boxing - Remember when boxing was relevant? I do. I remember when names like Ali, Foreman, Leonard, Hagler, Hearns, Duran, Tyson and Holifield were household names. But something changed. Name me the current champs of three weight classes. If you can do so without looking it up, you're in the minority. Without the names, boxing is just two guys beating each other's brains out. Time to end it.

            2. Horse Racing - Perhaps the dumbest thing I've read in a long time was printed today after the Kentucky Derby winner, Barbaro, had to be put down after months of medical treatment for a broken leg. The article said Barbaro "was a champion till the end." No, Barbaro was a horse. All things being equal, he would have rather lived in a field somewhere, eating grass and enjoying being a horse. I'm sure he never thought, "gee, I'd like to have someone whip me so I'll run until my leg snaps."

            3. Greyhound Racing - Pretty much the same as above.

            4. NHL Hockey - Nobody cares. Well, at least not South of Canada. Please.... stop telling me that there are four major sports in the U.S. There are three: football, baseball and basketball.

            5. Televised Poker - Okay. Its not really a sport. So why is it on ESPN (and, yes, I know the "E" stands for entertainment, but its not entertaining). To me, watching a bunch of people play cards is about as exciting as watching grass grow (I'll bet $50 on the blade on the left!).
            -01-29-2007, 03:49 PM
          • DJRamFan
            Arena league owner isn't sure city is ready for MLB
            by DJRamFan
            By Adam Candee
            <candee@lasvegassun.com>
            LAS VEGAS SUN

            Jim Ferraro moved his Arena Football League franchise from New Jersey to Las Vegas in December 2002, gambling that he could buck the city's history of rejecting even the most noble of sporting franchises.

            And as noble an idea as he feels moving the Montreal Expos to Las Vegas would be, Ferraro said recently that he is just fine watching someone else gamble their money on selling Major League Baseball on the Strip.

            "I'm not so sure it's the right place, but who knows," Ferraro said.

            As he prepares for the Las Vegas Gladiators' third season in town, Ferraro can speak with some authority about the changing sporting climate of the city. He has watched his team draw respectable, but far from overwhelming, crowds for two years at the Thomas & Mack Center, averaging just under 10,000 tickets sold -- and closer to 7,000 actual attendance -- per game in 2004. By Las Vegas historical standards, that is not bad.

            Ferraro acknowledged in 2002 and reiterated Thursday that he did not expect the Gladiators to really establish themselves in Las Vegas until their third season, putting some onus on the upcoming year. He still feels strongly that sports can work in the valley.

            "Vegas is a major-league city," Ferraro said. "It deserves all these sports franchises."

            But that is tempered praise from Ferraro, who went on to say that he would want no more than a small part of the risk involved in relocating baseball's nomad franchise to Las Vegas. To draw the kind of crowds necessary for financial stability through 81 home games over six months, in addition to keeping enough year-round event traffic in the proposed facility to make the building profitable, is an endeavor that Ferraro worries could be a struggle.

            That goes not only for the Expos themselves, but also for the city's credibility in attracting major sports as it continues to grow in size and respectability as a market for professional teams.

            "If it doesn't work, it will be a black eye for Vegas for potential sports teams," Ferraro said.

            His better idea? It's not a new one -- professional basketball in Las Vegas.

            "I personally would be more interested in doing a basketball team than a baseball team because basketball has a track record there," Ferraro said, noting how fans supported UNLV through its heyday in the 1980s and 1990s.

            Success for an outfit such as the Gladiators is measured on a much different scale than it would be for the Expos. Ferraro said that given some anticipated improvement in sponsorship deals in 2005, the Gladiators can certainly be profitable for the first time in three years if they average 12,000 tickets sold per game.

            "We'll actually make a profit next year,"...
            -06-30-2004, 10:07 AM
          • psycho9985
            Tragic and UnAmerican B.S.
            by psycho9985
            IOC president Jacques Rogge (search) said baseball and softball, two sports invented in America, would be eligible to win their way back into the Olympics for 2016.

            Baseball and softball, which will remain on the program for the 2008 Beijing Games, are the first sports eliminated from the Olympics since polo in 1936.

            "I think they've made a big, big mistake," said Tom Lasorda, the former Dodgers manager who guided the U.S. team to the gold medal in the 2000 Sydney Games. "Baseball is played by all countries now, and softball, too. I think that's really going to hurt the Olympics."

            Bob DuPuy, the major leagues' chief operating officer, said the IOC's decision will "adversely affect millions of sports fans worldwide."

            With two slots open on the program, the IOC voted from a waiting list of five sports: golf, rugby, squash, karate and roller sports. Squash and karate were nominated but rejected overwhelmingly, failing to get two-thirds approval.

            Dropping baseball and softball will remove 16 teams and more than 300 athletes from the Olympics.

            Baseball, which became a medal sport in 1992, has been vulnerable because of steroids in the major leagues and the absence of major leaguers from the Olympics. Softball, a women's only medal sport since 1996 won all three times by the United States, has been in danger because of its association with baseball and a perceived lack of global appeal and participation.

            "The lack of the MLB players — I think people have looked and said, `Well, all right, if there's to be a change, that seems to be the logic of it,"' British IOC member Craig Reedie said.

            Among the players who competed in the Olympics before starring in the majors are Jason Giambi, Jason Varitek, Nomar Garciaparra and Ben Sheets.

            Major League Baseball has toughened its drug-testing programs, but they still fall far short of Olympic standards.

            "Problems with doping in U.S. baseball probably cost the sport dearly," Australian IOC member John Coates said.

            Several IOC members also cited high stadium costs associated with both sports, saying baseball and softball venues have little use in some host cities after the games.

            "I feel like somebody who has been thrown out — it's certainly not a good feeling," said Aldo Notari, the Italian president of the International Baseball Federation. "I don't think the IOC members know our sport deeply enough."

            Don Porter, the American president of the international softball federation, said his sport's ties to baseball created problems.

            "We tried to keep our distance," he said. "But I think there's still too many people think we're part of baseball. We're absolutely not."

            Cuba has won three of the four gold medals since baseball was first played...
            -07-08-2005, 09:22 PM
          • DJRamFan
            Cbs To Acquire Cstv: College Sports Television Networks
            by DJRamFan
            Popular Cable and Satellite Sports Network with Nearly 15 Million Subscribers Marks CBS's Entry Into Cable Sports Arena





            Nov. 3, 2005

            CBS today announced the acquisition of CSTV Networks, Inc., the leading digital media company devoted exclusively to college athletics. The announcement was made by Leslie Moonves, Chairman of CBS and Co-President and Co-Chief Operating Officer of Viacom Inc.

            CBS is acquiring CSTV Networks, Inc. for $325 million. The transaction is likely to close in early January 2006, after certain governmental approvals are obtained, and after the split of Viacom into two discrete entities, which is expected by the end of 2005. At that time, consideration for the transaction will be in CBS Corporation Class B non-voting common stock.

            The new cable programming entity will be operated by its founder and CEO, Brian Bedol, who will report to Moonves. The acquisition includes:

            · A digital cable network featuring 30 men's and women's college sports events and nearly 15 million subscribers by year end and growing; license deals now include numerous sports agreements with colleges, universities and conferences across the nation;

            · Online properties consisting of a network of more than 250 official college athletic websites -- each maintained and managed for its institution by CSTV -- featuring full video and audio, news, scores, community elements and e-commerce for retail college sports-related products;

            · A fast-growing website, www.CSTV.com, that supports the cable networks and other online properties. In its most recent analysis, Comscore Media Metrix ranked the CSTV.com network as one of the top ten destinations with the greatest prior monthly increase in unique visitors during the month of September 2005, with a 43 percent increase from August, and more than 7.5 million unique visitors;

            · Regional College Sports Networks to be launched in 2006, featuring the sporting events of the Mountain West Conference and Conference USA, including Utah, Brigham Young University, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Memphis, Southern Mississippi, Marshall and others.

            "I am very excited about this acquisition, which brings a new dimension to our efforts in sports and the digital space as well," said Moonves. "We're not only getting hugely valuable assets here, we're acquiring a superb management team that has a proven record in building lucrative sports television franchises. College athletics and the online community it generates represent one of the biggest sectors in sports television, and CSTV has made tremendous strides in capturing this market. We think it's a natural fit for our company and we're confident that, as part of CBS, it will continue to grow and compete even more aggressively."


            Moonves added: "As the founder of The...
            -11-05-2005, 02:15 PM
          • DJRamFan
            Instant replay finally lands in college football
            by DJRamFan
            Aug. 4, 2004
            By Dennis Dodd
            SportsLine.com Senior Writer
            Tell Dennis your opinion!


            CHICAGO -- The Big Ten thinks it is making history this season with instant replay.

            Really, it has no idea.

            History is the humble 69-year old man half a continent away speaking calmly about his invention that changed, well, everything.

            "I'm not much of a sports guy," said Jim Wheeler by phone from San Luis Obispo, Calif. "It wasn't until the fall of 1965 and I was at my father's place watching a football game. I said, 'Wait a minute, I didn't know they were doing that.'"


            Last-second calls can now be reviewed in college basketball as well.(Getty Images)
            The inventor of instant replay has trouble grasping what he has wrought. Replay was never meant to change anything forever, much less sports. One day in 1964, he and some buds from Ampex Corporation drove around Silicon Valley with a camera mounted to the top of a Studebaker. They taped some local high school baseball practices. Went up to Stanford and did the same for some Cardinal football practices.

            "Thought it was going to be used for training films," he said.

            On another day, the Navy couldn't figure out why the landing gear on its aircraft-carrier jets kept collapsing. It called Wheeler to add stop-action to the jets' on-board cameras to isolate the problem. Pretty soon the crippled landings were solved.

            The next day, it seemed, ABC was calling, wanting to use the new technology for something called Wide World of Sports.

            Our viewing habits never were the same again. It wasn't even named instant replay until someone at CBS slapped on the label. Now it is the foundation of televised sports. It's why the Big Ten's experimentation with it could be a turning point in the sport.

            Before this year, college football's fathers held to the belief that human error was part of the game. Now, the Big Ten can't live without it -- on a one-year experimental basis, of course. But who are we kidding? Instant replay has infiltrated every nook and cranny of organized sports. This year it germinates and takes hold in college football.

            You can break down your swing at the local golf store with it. Its influence is such that major league stadiums aren't allowed to show replays on controversial plays for fear of embarrassing umpires. Yet Baseball Tonight wouldn't be in existence without it. It is an electronic safety net for leagues whose officials simply can't keep up anymore with today's athletes.

            "Our referees have been told he's God up there in the sky," Big Ten supervisor of officials Dave Parry said of the technical advisor who will review plays from the press box.

            All 44 Big Ten conference games will have instant replay. It will...
            -08-06-2004, 06:19 AM
          Working...
          X