Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Jahvid Best's role on the Rams

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Jahvid Best's role on the Rams

    Jahvid Best's name has come up many times in mock drafts for our 2nd round pick. So if indeed we go Bradford then Best and Steven Jackson is healthy week 1 what is Best's role going to be.

    Lets say we run the ball 30 times how many times does best run it?

    Is Best reliable enough for us to take Jackson out on 3rd down and put in best? (remember last year a couple times it was 3rd and 1 and we ran it with Gado? and i dont even wana get into that)

    Is Best in there to take over when jackson is tired or is he there to preserve Jackson for the 4th?


    Here is my thinking:

    Jackson is the starter (duh)

    1st quarter (RB on field)
    Best 60% Jackson 40%

    We basically let Jackson start but let Best be on the field more than Jackson in the 1st.

    2nd Quarter
    Best 50% Jackson 50%

    We dont use split backs with these 2 we just put them out equally. What im thinking is at halftime Best has more carries than Jackson.

    3rd Quarter
    Best 25% Jackson 75%

    Steven Jackson basically gets on the field more and makes plays.

    4th Quarter
    Best 45% Jackson 95%

    What? That does not add up to 100%. THe reason is because we should use split backs with the opposing defense having to guess which playmaker will make the play


    So what do you think Jahvid Best's role would be on the Rams? And how many carries per game do you think he will have?

  • #2
    Re: Jahvid Best's role on the Rams

    Change of pace, KR, PR and sometimes in a formation where he'd be a offensive weapon WITH S-Jax on the field.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Jahvid Best's role on the Rams

      no percentages. when Jackson gets tired or injured he goes in. he will only be a back up. and if we did use percentages Jackson would get most of the carries in the beginning.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Jahvid Best's role on the Rams

        Thickandthin, I disagree with you respectfully. Most would argue that Jackson is most effective in the 3rd and 4th quarter because he's such a powerful and fast RB and when the defenses are tired to begin with, we can just run the ball all day. I think it'd be good to have a strong complementary back for SJax. Not only will it decrease the chances of him getting injured but it'll keep both backs ready to go. I like the idea a lot.
        Always and Forever a fan of the St. Louis Rams

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Jahvid Best's role on the Rams

          Yeah, if we get Best, I cant see him grabbing that much of the spotlight. But thats why I am against drafting a backup RB in the 2nd.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Jahvid Best's role on the Rams

            Originally posted by Varg6
            Thickandthin, I disagree with you respectfully. Most would argue that Jackson is most effective in the 3rd and 4th quarter because he's such a powerful and fast RB and when the defenses are tired to begin with, we can just run the ball all day. I think it'd be good to have a strong complementary back for SJax. Not only will it decrease the chances of him getting injured but it'll keep both backs ready to go. I like the idea a lot.
            Ok I see what you mean, makes a bit of sense.


            Originally posted by sosa39rams
            Yeah, if we get Best, I cant see him grabbing that much of the spotlight. But thats why I am against drafting a backup RB in the 2nd.
            Yes I agree, but if we get a backup RB we should get him earliest in the 3rd, I'd like us to go Gresham in the second.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Jahvid Best's role on the Rams

              I just can't warrant us using our second round pick on a back-up RB. Even though it may be beneficial, it's just a luxury we can't afford. In the third round, definitely. But in the second round, we could grab a starter instead of a backup running back.


              If we did get Best, I would like seeing him used more in the first half, to tire out defenses with his speed, and let Jackson finish them off in the second half.

              You could also vice versa that and let Jackson pound away in the first half, and let Best burn the already weary defense in the second.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Jahvid Best's role on the Rams

                Last year we had Samkon Gado and he wasnt able to fill in for Jackson at times.

                It's obvious we need another playmaker. Also Jackson was carrying the ball way too much and we are going to need someone that can keep him healthy. He started wearing down as we went into week 13.

                Also no one is grabbing the spot light from Jackson someone is helping him maintain a spotlight throughout the season.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Jahvid Best's role on the Rams

                  His role with the Rams? Opponent. It's iffy whether he'll even last to the second round. If he does, there are a lot of reasons we would want to go a different direction. If we take Suh in round one, maybe we want Colt McCoy in round two. If we take Bradford, maybe we look for Jermaine Gresham to drop. Or take a receiver. Or a defensive lineman.

                  I agree that we need to land a playmaker in the second round--at a position where we don't already have one.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Jahvid Best's role on the Rams

                    Originally posted by Goldenfleece
                    His role with the Rams? Opponent. It's iffy whether he'll even last to the second round. If he does, there are a lot of reasons we would want to go a different direction. If we take Suh in round one, maybe we want Colt McCoy in round two. If we take Bradford, maybe we look for Jermaine Gresham to drop. Or take a receiver. Or a defensive lineman.

                    I agree that we need to land a playmaker in the second round--at a position where we don't already have one.
                    It'll be interesting what happens with the Bears, actually. Apparently they have some interest in Barron and perhaps we could simply swap players. Barron for Olsen. I'd be cool with that. I know this is all ESPN speculation but it sounds like a realistic scenario and suddenly TE isn't such a big hole in our offense.
                    Always and Forever a fan of the St. Louis Rams

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Jahvid Best's role on the Rams

                      if we managed to swap Barron for Olsen that would be great..id still say that there are other more pressing needs than complimentary RB..but it would move it one spot up the priority list atleast.

                      id prefer us to go for someone like Hardesty in the middle rounds than taking Best over someone like say..Wooten,Griffen,Robinson,Damion Williams,Brian Price,Odrick,Rodger Saffold etc...
                      i do like Best a lot..and understand everything that a complimentary RB would bring..but there are more pressing needs with high picks.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Jahvid Best's role on the Rams

                        As a Cal fan, I love Best, but he weighs about a pound & a half & has had at least two surgeries & a couple of concussions-the last one being very scary indeed-in a relatively short career as a starter.No way do I see him as a guy who would be able to run between the tackles very much in the NFL & stay healthy. He'd be great as a complementary back to SJ-both on the field together to stretch the defense wider- but we need to look elsewhere if Ogby or Darby can't be SJ's stand-in. Gerhart?

                        Comment

                        Related Topics

                        Collapse

                        • dgr828
                          Jackson is still the Dancin' Machine
                          by dgr828
                          Steven Jackson just can't seem to stop dancing before hitting to holes. He would have much more success if he could just run straight through the tackles. He had one breakout run for a TD, which was nice, but most of the time he's stuttter stepping, dancing back and forth, sometimes with unnecessary jukes that leads to being stuffed at the line or loss of yardage. Steven would do best to leave the dancing to his brother, Michael!
                          -11-25-2007, 04:42 PM
                        • Guam rammer
                          Steven Jackson THE PREDATOR!!!
                          by Guam rammer
                          Normally, players come up with their own names or the team starts it off but there isnt anything that has popped up so maybe the Ram nation can come up with something to label our star RB. Dude needs a name. His play and the way he looks when he runs with his dreds flopping all over the place reminds me of the predator. Thoughts?
                          -11-04-2009, 03:13 AM
                        • psycho9985
                          Which Jackson will show up
                          by psycho9985
                          I'm not on the stephan Jackson band wagon,sure the guy gets yardage,but I'm not seeing it when the chips are down.I dont like the way he hops and skips around trying to find a hole,why cant the guy just run the play called.
                          I know our offensive line is in not so great shape right now,but I hope the coaches are talking to him.He needs to play smash mouth football.Jackson is big enough and strong enough to be a fullback and I wish he'd run with power at the line of scrimmage.Marshall faulk has the speed and moves to skip around and blast through a hole in the line,but Jackson doesnt.
                          -09-23-2006, 12:44 PM
                        • sosa39rams
                          Steven Jackson Underrated?
                          by sosa39rams
                          I've recently been researching all over the net. From running back rankings, to predictions for next season.

                          Seems like Steven Jackson is underrated to me. I get really disappointed when I see players like Frank Gore, Ray Rice, Rashard Mendenhall infront of him.

                          I mean, there all great players, but Steven Jackson managed to get the 2nd most yards last season with 1,416 while missing a game and being on one of the worst teams in the NFL.

                          Seems like our team will be much improved this year, only helping Steven. SJAX has clearly proved he can play with 5 consecutive 1,000+ yard rushing seasons.

                          I see him being a pure beast next year. Achieving another 1,400+ yard season, 10+ td's, 40+ receptions, 500-600 yards, and 3-6 td's.

                          I think he is the best running back in the NFL. I don't want this to be a bias opinion, but with an improved team, he will only do better. Sure there is "some concern" with his back surgery but I'm sure he will easily work past that.

                          I mean this guy does it all. He can clearly run, catch, block, even throw! Career passing stats 1/1 2 yards, 1 td and a QB rating of 118.8.

                          What do you guys think?
                          -06-09-2010, 08:13 AM
                        • RockinRam
                          Pressure Point: Preserving Jackson
                          by RockinRam
                          By Matt Williamson
                          Scouts Inc.





                          St. Louis is counting on Steven Jackson. He is needed. He is needed in many ways for the Rams to approach respectability.
                          Jackson is a great player. He is one of my favorite running backs in this league and is one of the true bell cow runners left. But I also think that a few years from now, Steve Spagnuolo is going to look back at his rookie year as a head coach and regret putting Jackson through the punishment he endured in 2009.


                          I hope Spagnuolo learns from his mistake last season, but something tells me we should expect more of the same in 2010. That puts Jackson under the spotlight, as the short-term fate of the Rams' offense rests firmly on his shoulders -- and on his now surgically repaired back.
                          My fear is that there will not be a long term. Let's face it; the Rams are not going to win the Super Bowl this season. They are rebuilding. And if/when they finally do become a contender, running back may be a major need because Jackson is spending his best days grinding out yardage on a terrible team.
                          With their massive investment in Sam Bradford, the Rams must have a ground game. Their offensive line is young and talented. It should be improved from a year ago.
                          Not only is Jackson the Rams' best player, but a solid running game is a rookie quarterback's best friend, and Jackson's receiving ability out of the backfield should provide Bradford with an exceptional and reliable option when the original play doesn't go according to script. Jackson can do it all well, including running on the perimeter or up the middle.
                          But the Rams, with or without Bradford as the starting quarterback, are not going to frighten many defenses with their passing game. Every defensive coordinator on the schedule is going to key on shutting down Jackson first and foremost. St. Louis lacks dangerous pass-catching weapons and Jackson will face a stacked box far more often than not.
                          That takes a toll on a running back's body. Not only is he going to take a lot of hits, but he is going to get hit often by multiple defenders at once. Obviously this is true for all ball carriers, but more so for Jackson considering his circumstances.
                          Is this offseason surgery the beginning of the end for Jackson? Often when a running back begins to lose a step, the decline is very rapid. Last season, he didn't break long runs like he once did, and if this trend continues, the writing might be on the wall.
                          With the huge number of needs St. Louis has in its rebuilding project, it is understandable why the Rams have gone in other directions instead of acquiring a backup running back for Jackson, but this massive hole on their roster could really hurt the franchise for the long term. The lack of a suitable backup running back might lead to the erosion of the Rams' best asset.
                          That might be jumping the gun -- and some running backs will hit...
                          -05-14-2010, 03:14 PM
                        Working...
                        X
                        😀
                        🥰
                        🤢
                        😎
                        😡
                        👍
                        👎