Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Evaluating QBs is a tough part of draft

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Evaluating QBs is a tough part of draft

    BY JIM THOMAS
    ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH
    04/12/2010

    If only it were a matter of standing tall in the pocket and throwing the ball through a wall. Evaluating talent is always a crapshoot in the NFL draft. But picking a quarterback?

    Double tough.

    There's so much that goes into playing the position, things that can't be timed or measured, things that have absolutely nothing to do with size or arm strength. Which helps explain why even at the top of draft there's a Ryan Leaf for every Peyton Manning; an Akili Smith for every Donovan McNabb. MORE RAMS


    Rams general manager Billy Devaney says he has learned this lesson the hard way at times over his career as an NFL personnel evaluator.

    "I've come full circle," Devaney said. "If you don't have the intangibles to play that position. ..."

    Well, it's probably not going to work.

    Devaney was with the San Diego Chargers when they drafted Leaf — a colossal bust — No. 2 overall in 1998. And that experience helped change his thinking.

    "To me, the physical skills are almost the easy part now (in evaluating) these kids," Devaney said. "There's so much that goes into being a quarterback in the NFL. The work ethic that you have to have. The leadership. The time that you put in. The media scrutiny. If you can't handle all that stuff, you're going to have a hard time performing on the field."

    As they decide whether to take Sam Bradford, or perhaps trade down for Jimmy Clausen or Colt McCoy, the Rams are factoring lots of traits and characteristics into the evaluation process.

    FOLLOW ME

    "The teams that have been successful lately, it seems to me they have those leadership-type guys," coach Steve Spagnuolo said. "Guys that can get the job done in a pinch. Certainly you want all the other things that go with (playing quarterback) — a guy that can throw the football, all the physical qualities. But leadership to me is really important at that position."

    In Detroit, coach Jim Schwartz said the Lions felt the same way en route to deciding on Georgia quarterback Matthew Stafford as No. 1 overall.

    "Does the team believe in this quarterback's ability to win?" Schwartz said. "If you can't cross that hurdle, it doesn't matter how strong his arm is, or how smart he is, or how fast he is or any of those other things. He's the leader of the team, and if a team doesn't have confidence in that player, then you're never going to get anywhere with him."

    Leadership doesn't show up on game film. So it takes lots of research, but there should be a track record in college and earlier.

    "You just grind as much as you can, talk to as many people, and try to get as accurate a picture as you can on the guy," Devaney said.

    "Hopefully, you're getting good information," Spagnuolo said.

    THE MENTAL GAME

    You can be the brightest quarterback around in terms of IQ, but if you don't see the field, recognize coverages, see receivers breaking open — and do it quickly — it's hard to be successful in the NFL.

    "We all wonder about the Wonderlic test and so forth," NFL.com analyst Gil Brandt said. "But there's a lot of times you have smart players that don't have mental quickness."

    Some of these traits are discernible on film. But teams also like to test a quarterback prospect by getting him in front of a greaseboard and having him talk X's and O's.

    Brandt tells a story of one such meeting this year with Florida quarterback Tim Tebow and an NFL team. When the team asked him about a specific play, Tebow replied: "This is how it's called at Florida, this is how it's called with your organization, and this is how it's called with West Coast teams."

    "When you get a quarterback and he reacts that quickly, you know that the guy not only is pretty smart but he has that mental quickness to adjust very fast," said Brandt, the former Dallas Cowboys personnel guru.

    Apparently, not all the quarterbacks in this year's draft pool have handled their greaseboard sessions as well as Tebow.

    "If he can't explain the thing, and corrects himself — and corrects himself in the middle of it — then how can he handle the volume of what we're going to throw at him in the NFL?" said a veteran QB coach, speaking on the condition of anonymity.

    According to this coach, that's what happened with a quarterback prospect during the pre-draft process for his NFL team. "And that kid happened to be one of the most talented guys in the draft," the coach said. "If I'm on that team, and he can't say that play in the huddle, can I follow this guy?"

    Of course, it's easy to show off football acumen with a grease marker in your hand. But what about with a blitzing linebacker in your face? Of after getting crunched — again — by a defensive end?

    "A lot of times you watch a college player on a good team and he might get hit once or twice in a game, and he's not throwing under a lot of pressure a lot of the time," San Diego coach Norv Turner said. "That's not the way our (NFL) game is played. They've got to throw in tight quarters. They've got to throw the ball with guys getting ready to hit them in the face. And then they've got to get up and throw it again the next down."

    Be it Bradford, Clausen, McCoy — whoever — that's what everyone in the quarterback Class of 2010 will face at the next level.
    :ramlogo:

  • #2
    Re: Evaluating QBs is a tough part of draft

    I feel like I am the only one that thinks we should draft Suh and Colt McCoy in the second. By mid way through the first we'll know what the Qb situations is and we can react. Plus this year that second round pick has a great value and we might be able to move down AND grab Colt McCoy.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Evaluating QBs is a tough part of draft

      Solid article. I wanted to highlight this part particularly...

      Of course, it's easy to show off football acumen with a grease marker in your hand. But what about with a blitzing linebacker in your face? Of after getting crunched — again — by a defensive end?

      "A lot of times you watch a college player on a good team and he might get hit once or twice in a game, and he's not throwing under a lot of pressure a lot of the time," San Diego coach Norv Turner said. "That's not the way our (NFL) game is played. They've got to throw in tight quarters. They've got to throw the ball with guys getting ready to hit them in the face. And then they've got to get up and throw it again the next down."

      Be it Bradford, Clausen, McCoy — whoever — that's what everyone in the quarterback Class of 2010 will face at the next level.
      More than a few times, when someone brings up a concern about Bradford not playing in a pro-style offense, the response is, "But Bradford took a lot of snaps under center his freshman year, so it won't be a problem." Of course, being able to physically handle the snap from under center probably isn't the biggest reason people bring up the transition from spread to pro-style offense. It's reasons like the ones Norv Turner highlights here.

      As the name would imply, the spread offense spreads the defense out across the field, not only stretching them perhaps too thin but also creating mismatches against receiving targets while limiting the options of their defense in terms of pressure.

      Sure, you can bring seven defenders in a pressure package if you want, but that means at least one of my five receiving targets is uncovered and the rest are likely in single coverage. You can walk your linebackers out to cover my slot target, but chances are he's much faster and it won't be tough making that throw given the separation.

      Don't get me wrong, Sam Bradford has a very quick, accurate release. But there's a reason Landry Jones was also sacked only 12 times on nearly 450 pass attempts in 2009, or why Jason White was sacked a mere nine times on nearly 400 passing attempts in 2004. Keeping your quarterback's jersey clean is one of the advantages to the spread offense, so I think Turner brings up a good point.

      I think Bradford is smart enough and hard working enough to make the transition at the next level (instead, my question is whether he'll survive the process when it's all said and done). But it's going to be a transition, and that transition involves much more than whether or not he'll be able to handle a snap from under center. There's much more to it than that.


      Originally posted by thermobee View Post
      I feel like I am the only one that thinks we should draft Suh and Colt McCoy in the second. By mid way through the first we'll know what the Qb situations is and we can react. Plus this year that second round pick has a great value and we might be able to move down AND grab Colt McCoy.
      I prefer Suh in the first round as well, and I think Colt will be there in the second, though he's also going to have a transition ahead of him, too.
      Last edited by Nick; -04-12-2010, 05:57 AM.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Evaluating QBs is a tough part of draft

        Originally posted by thermobee View Post
        I feel like I am the only one that thinks we should draft Suh and Colt McCoy in the second.
        Definitely not the only one, Thermo. Since day 1 my draft strategy has been 1. Suh, 2. BQBA (assumedly McCoy), 3. Danario Alexander. But there's 3 variables that have to be factored:

        1. How good will Bradford be?
        2. How good will McCoy be?
        3. What's the chance that McCoy is available at #33?

        My answers.....

        1. He'll be outstanding. The shoulder appears to be 100%, and he looks to be on top of the heap.

        2. He'll be outstanding......in the right system. From what I've seen/read/heard, there is little difference between Bradford and McCoy from the line to 25 yards out. Both are quick & intelligent decision makers with excellent accuracy. The difference? Everything beyond 25 yards. At 25+, Bradford is the superior QB.

        3. This is the tricky one. I think, that is THINK, he'll be available at #33, but I'm just not sure the Vikes pass him. If one of the top Corners is available to the Vikes they'll probably pass on McCoy, but if not.....
        Last edited by HUbison; -04-12-2010, 12:33 PM.
        The more things change, the more they stay the same.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Evaluating QBs is a tough part of draft

          Originally posted by thermobee View Post
          I feel like I am the only one that thinks we should draft Suh and Colt McCoy in the second. By mid way through the first we'll know what the Qb situations is and we can react. Plus this year that second round pick has a great value and we might be able to move down AND grab Colt McCoy.

          You are not alone

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Evaluating QBs is a tough part of draft

            Originally posted by thermobee View Post
            I feel like I am the only one that thinks we should draft Suh and Colt McCoy in the second. By mid way through the first we'll know what the Qb situations is and we can react. Plus this year that second round pick has a great value and we might be able to move down AND grab Colt McCoy.
            I do agree, and I do think that Colt will excel in our WCO scheme, but if Jermaine Gresham was there at the top of the second I would give him great consideration.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Evaluating QBs is a tough part of draft

              Originally posted by Nick View Post
              Solid article. I wanted to highlight this part particularly...



              More than a few times, when someone brings up a concern about Bradford not playing in a pro-style offense, the response is, "But Bradford took a lot of snaps under center his freshman year, so it won't be a problem." Of course, being able to physically handle the snap from under center probably isn't the biggest reason people bring up the transition from spread to pro-style offense. It's reasons like the ones Norv Turner highlights here.

              As the name would imply, the spread offense spreads the defense out across the field, not only stretching them perhaps too thin but also creating mismatches against receiving targets while limiting the options of their defense in terms of pressure.

              Sure, you can bring seven defenders in a pressure package if you want, but that means at least one of my five receiving targets is uncovered and the rest are likely in single coverage. You can walk your linebackers out to cover my slot target, but chances are he's much faster and it won't be tough making that throw given the separation.

              Don't get me wrong, Sam Bradford has a very quick, accurate release. But there's a reason Landry Jones was also sacked only 12 times on nearly 450 pass attempts in 2009, or why Jason White was sacked a mere nine times on nearly 400 passing attempts in 2004. Keeping your quarterback's jersey clean is one of the advantages to the spread offense, so I think Turner brings up a good point.

              I think Bradford is smart enough and hard working enough to make the transition at the next level (instead, my question is whether he'll survive the process when it's all said and done). But it's going to be a transition, and that transition involves much more than whether or not he'll be able to handle a snap from under center. There's much more to it than that.




              I prefer Suh in the first round as well, and I think Colt will be there in the second, though he's also going to have a transition ahead of him, too.

              You beat me to it (again!). That's just a HUGE unknown about Bradford, and going simply by his track record in taking sacks, he doesn't appear to be the absolute best player in the world in dealing with it. Is the reward worth the risk with Bradford? Find out next time on...As the NFL Turns

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Evaluating QBs is a tough part of draft

                Originally posted by thermobee View Post
                I feel like I am the only one that thinks we should draft Suh and Colt McCoy in the second. By mid way through the first we'll know what the Qb situations is and we can react. Plus this year that second round pick has a great value and we might be able to move down AND grab Colt McCoy.
                I am all for Suh and Colt in second round.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Evaluating QBs is a tough part of draft

                  Originally posted by thickandthin View Post
                  I do agree, and I do think that Colt will excel in our WCO scheme, but if Jermaine Gresham was there at the top of the second I would give him great consideration.
                  Exactly McCoy is the better WCO guy, I feel like Bradford is more for an Indy type offense. And you are right Gresham would be huge, but its hard to pass on a very servicable to great Qb at 33

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Evaluating QBs is a tough part of draft

                    Originally posted by HUbison View Post
                    2. He'll be outstanding......in the right system. From what I've seen/read/heard, there is little difference between Bradford and McCoy from the line to 25 yards out. Both are quick & intelligent decision makers with excellent accuracy. The difference? Everything beyond 25 yards. At 25+, Bradford is the superior QB.
                    My main concern about McCoy is the intermediate routes. I'm not so worried about whether he can put a perfect spiral on a 60-yard bomb, but it's those "stick" throws that I've heard might not be his strong suit. All in all, I think arm strength is an overrated facet of quarterback evaluation, but there are enough parallels between McCoy and Alex Smith to have me a little worried.

                    I like his accuracy. I like his mobility. I get a good impression of his intangibles and leadership qualifications. It's just not real reassuring when Devaney talks about a guy as saying his arm is only "good enough" at a time when nobody is saying anything bad about anybody.

                    Comment

                    Related Topics

                    Collapse

                    • eldfan
                      Quarterback draft class: For now, questions fill the air
                      by eldfan
                      By Jim Corbett, USA TODAY
                      INDIANAPOLIS — Red flags rivaling those posted at a riptide-threatened beach were raised by the 2010 quarterback class at the NFL scouting combine.
                      From Sam Bradford's surgically repaired throwing shoulder to Jimmy Clausen's surgically repaired right toe and maturity issues to Tim Tebow's 2.0 release, Colt McCoy's lack of ideal height and Dan LeFevour's decision not to throw, questions abound.

                      "This is the most uncertain quarterback year I've seen," NFL Network draft analyst Mike Mayock says.

                      "Most people in the league would say Sam Bradford is clearly No. 1. Some people will feel comfortable with Jimmy Clausen because he comes out of a pro-style offense.

                      "(Clausen) can make all the throws. But there's some hesitancy to just decide that he's the guy. He has to prove he has leadership skills and the other intangibles."

                      Former Florida star Tebow oozes intangibles. But his elongated release fueled criticism at the Senior Bowl.

                      Tebow hired former NFL quarterback and head coach Sam Wyche along with Zeke Bratkowski and Marc Trestman— both with experience as NFL offensive assistants — to revamp his throwing mechanics. The result is a quicker, more compact release, according to Tebow.

                      "Tebow is never going to look like Sam Bradford, that classic passer," Mayock says. "But can you modify him to the point where those changes stick under pressure? It's one thing to go out on your pro day and throw. It's another thing when you're facing an overload blitz from the Pittsburgh Steelers and you're trying to get rid of the football to your hot-read receiver."

                      Bradford, whom the St. Louis Rams are considering with the first overall pick along with Clausen and defensive tackles Ndamukong Suh and Gerald McCoy, said his shoulder is 85% healed after Oct. 28 reconstructive surgery performed by renowned orthopedist James Andrews.

                      Bradford said there was no damage to his rotator cuff and that he has been throwing the past six weeks at Athletes' Performance Institute in Pensacola, Fla., with former NFL quarterbacks coach Terry Shea.

                      "Sam's accuracy is probably his signature," Shea says. "That's a pretty darn good signature to have.

                      "Sam has all those consistent manners about his play that Peyton Manning brings to the field. Sam brings that 6-4, very tall frame in everything he does.

                      "To be that tall and have as good a feet as he does? That's a rare combination."

                      Bradford met Peyton, Eli and Archie Manning while working as a counselor at the Manning Passing Academy in Louisiana over the summer.

                      "Obviously, it is an extremely high compliment to be compared to someone like Peyton Manning, one of the greatest quarterbacks to ever play the game," Bradford says of...
                      -03-06-2010, 08:11 AM
                    • Nick
                      Devaney Runs the Gamut
                      by Nick
                      Devaney Runs the Gamut
                      Posted >Fri, February 26, 2010 11:15
                      by Nick Wagoner

                      INDIANAPOLIS -

                      - Rams general manager Billy Devaney addressed the media about two hours ago and went in depth on his thoughts on what are the four prime prospects for the top pick in this year's draft (in no order): Nebraska DT Ndamukong Suh, Oklahoma DT Gerald McCoy, Oklahoma QB Sam Bradford and Notre Dame QB Jimmy Clausen.

                      - But Devaney didn't stop there. He also addressed rumors about Steven Jackson and more on the draft scenarios being thrown around out there. With that, here's a good portion of Devaney's discussion from this morning.

                      (Information on Sam Bradford’s health)
                      We haven’t. We will get with the doctors, our medical people as soon as we get back to St. Louis. That will be a big decision and a lot will go into that. We will probably have more than one opinion on that. We will get as accurate and thorough information that we can. We will find out after this process is over.

                      (How do you separate Suh and McCoy?)
                      We are hoping that somehow there is separation. Right now in our eyes, there isn’t any. They are both great players, they are going to be great players. They are great character guys, they love playing football. I hope something happens where there is separation. Right now in our eyes, there isn’t.

                      (Barring a trade, it seems there are about four prospects to choose between, is it now a decision of choosing between two positions?)
                      Sure. When you are 1-15, there are a lot of different directions you can go and we are still trying to figure that out. There are pros and cons to whatever position you decide to go but we know that if it comes down to that right now and there are four guys that will be given consideration but we have to be prepared for anything. If we do wind up trading down a little bit, we have to have a bunch of guys in the hopper that we feel good about. Those four guys you mentioned, sure, we like everything about them so far.

                      (Any trade talks yet?)
                      No. It’s too early for that. We haven’t even gone through the free agency period. That could alter it. We are sitting here right now thinking we need A, B and C and we sign a guy a couple weeks from now at that position, it may alter your draft strategy a little bit. But there hasn’t been any phone calls to any team whatsoever. I would think eventually that will happen but it’s too early.

                      (But the phone lines are open?)
                      Of course. Everybody that comes up here is open for more picks. Nobody is going to say ‘Hell no, we don’t want more picks, we are staying where we are.’

                      (Worried about medical information on Bradford?)
                      Yeah, that’s why we put it on the doctors. They better be sure. You hope so. You get to all of the tests but...
                      -02-26-2010, 09:49 AM
                    • r8rh8rmike
                      The Watercooler: Who Are The Rams' Top Draft Options At QB?
                      by r8rh8rmike
                      10.22.2009 12:27 pm
                      Who are Rams’ top draft options at QB?
                      By Roger Hensley

                      THE WATERCOOLER

                      QUESTION: If the St. Louis Rams were to take a quarterback in the first round of next year’s draft, which current college quarterback would you suggest they select?

                      BERNIE MIKLASZ
                      Very tough call, and of course I reserve the right to change my mind later, after these kids play more games and also go through the NFL Scouting Combine. Because a lot can change between now and the draft. But if we are talking right now, I’d go with Washington’s Jake Locker. Big (6-3), strong and athletic, Locker has a plus arm, and a quick release. He’s been thriving in the pro-style offense installed by first-year head coach Steve Sarkisian. Also, Locker is being tutored by one of the best, QBs coach Steve Clarkson, who in the past has worked with Ben Roethlisberger, Matt Leinart and others. Clarkson cleaned up Locker’s mechanics and the improvement was immediate. And keep in mind that Locker is getting it done at Washington, and he’s not surrounded by elite talent. That makes his performance even more impressive.

                      Notre Dame’s Jimmy Clausen has moved up as an NFL prospect. Clausen has always had the natural talent, but he’s grown at Notre Dame, and is more physically imposing now. Looks like a tough kid, too. He is certainly used to pressure and it doesn’t get to him. The best is yet to come for Clausen. The red flags are out on Oklahoma’s Sam Bradford; it’s not only the shoulder injuries, but the questions of whether he can throw while under pressure, because he doesn’t encounter much of a pass rush at OU. Cincinnati’s Tony Pike could be the steal of the draft; he’s likely to be downgraded and drop down the board because of multiple injuries to his left wrist. But he’s a player. Not sure if Colt McCoy (Texas) has the frame, but he seems like a good fit for a West Coast offense. Jevan Snead (Ole Miss) has been touted by scouts and draftniks, but I haven’t seen enough (yet) to get excited by his NFL future. Again, that could change. All of this could.

                      VAHE GREGORIAN
                      With his bum shoulder this season, Oklahoma quarterback Sam Bradford may be losing stock for the 2010 draft or may even be considering waiting another year to come out. But if he’s available, the Rams would be wise to snap him up. Although he could stand to be more mobile, especially considering the Rams line, last year’s Heisman Trophy winner has all the tools to build a team around: accuracy (67.9 percent of his passes last season), height (6-4) and a leadership presence that makes players want to play better just for him, OU coach Bob Stoops says. Maybe some will see the shoulder injury and apparent aggravation of it last week against Texas as something chronic or signs he is brittle, but sometimes quarterbacks just get hit and hurt. There’s no reason to think it’s anything more with Bradford.

                      JEFF...
                      -10-22-2009, 04:20 PM
                    • eldfan
                      QB or no QB? In draft, Rams in search of new face for franchise
                      by eldfan
                      By Jim Corbett, USA TODAY


                      INDIANAPOLIS — The St. Louis Rams own the first overall pick and a likely draft-day quarterback quandary.
                      The consensus best prospects among evaluators of this draft class are defensive tackles Ndamukong Suh of Nebraska and Gerald McCoy of Oklahoma.

                      But if healthy, former Oklahoma quarterback Sam Bradford is considered the top quarterback and the 1-15 Rams are a franchise without a face.

                      They seem set on moving on from the battered and beaten-up Marc Bulger and are in desperate need of a long-term answer at quarterback to energize their fan base.


                      FROM THE COMBINE: Top prospect Dez Bryant won't work out
                      DRAFT ORDER: How teams will select in the first round

                      On Thursday, ESPN's Adam Schefter guaranteed on-air that the Rams will select Bradford first overall in the April 22-24 draft.

                      One problem. Bradford, who is rehabilitating his throwing shoulder following Oct. 28 AC joint reconstructive surgery, won't throw for teams until his March 25 personal pro day in Norman, Okla.

                      Only then will teams have a better idea about the status of the shoulder of the top-rated quarterback prospect.


                      PHOTOS: NFL scouting combine

                      "That took a lot of pressure off us right away when Dr. Schefter cleared him medically," Rams general manager Billy Devaney cracked Friday. "We feel really good about the health status of Sam Bradford now with Dr. Schefter giving him a clean bill of health and guaranteeing our pick. So we're on to the second round right now."

                      Devaney did concede the team is considering Suh, McCoy, Bradford and Notre Dame quarterback Jimmy Clausen. "I think we pretty much know who the potential candidates are," he said.

                      He also conceded the organization is still mulling which position can help the team most.

                      "Sure," he said. "When you're 1-15, there's a lot of different directions you can go and we're still trying to figure that out. There are four guys that will be given consideration. But we have to be prepared for anything (a trade down).

                      "Those four guys, we like everything about them so far."

                      The Rams have taken a defensive linemen near the top of the draft in two of the last three years, with defensive tackle Adam Carriker (2007) and defensive end Chris Long (2008).

                      No team has called yet with any offers for the top pick. What's more, the Rams have not talked to the Philadelphia Eagles about quarterback Michael Vick.

                      "I can tell you this, we have not talked to Philadelphia about any of their players," Devaney said.

                      Devaney did insist: The Rams can't overdraft for position.

                      "If it gets down to we think the defensive tackles, these two kids, are far and away...
                      -03-01-2010, 12:36 PM
                    • Goldenfleece
                      QB Quick Takes
                      by Goldenfleece
                      A Pre-Combine consideration of some of the draft’s top quarterbacks:

                      Sam Bradford
                      Observations: The one benefit to Bradford’s lost season was highlighting the impact he had on the Sooners’ success. With Bradford in the lineup, OU was a national title contender in ‘08. Without him, they struggled to 8-5 in ‘09. Like Tebow and McCoy, he was a key component of one of college football’s best teams. Unlike Tebow and McCoy, Bradford was a pocket passer who succeeded using the same skills he will be asked to draw upon in the pros. He goes through his progressions, makes quick decisions, uses good judgment, and has completed a high percentage of his throws.
                      Risk Factors: By far, the biggest question is how his shoulder checks out. Bradford played in a spread offense but stayed in the pocket more than most spread quarterbacks. Nonetheless, there will be some questions about transitioning to a system where he will be dropping back on the majority of plays.
                      Gut Reaction: Bradford's got game. If his shoulder checks out, he is the only quarterback I'd seriously consider drafting in the top five at the moment.

                      Jimmy Clausen
                      Observations: If some quarterbacks are raw prospects and others polished, Clausen is that shiny spot on a bronze statue that has been rubbed about a million times for good luck. Jimmy’s older brothers were Division I quarterbacks, his parents paid for him to learn from a professional quarterbacks coach in junior high, he went to a prep school with a high profile football program, and capped it off by learning a pro system at Notre Dame from none other than Charlie Weis. It is doubtful that any other quarterback in this class compares in terms of preparation for the NFL. The flip side is that he might also be the closest to his ceiling. Despite what might sound like a slightly pampered upbringing, Clausen has played through injury and sickness and earned his place on the team. He has a quick release and throws with velocity and accuracy.
                      Risk Factors: One area of concern is that despite Clausen’s gaudy personal statistics, the Irish never made it into a BCS bowl under his leadership. His college career ended with his head coach being fired after 4 straight losses to the likes of Navy, Pitt, U Conn, and Stanford. This was the team’s second loss to Navy in Clausen’s three years starting, snapping a 43-game streak of Notre Dame wins in the match-up. Given that all of ND’s losses were close last season (7 points or less), it is a bit disappointing that he did not pull off a few more comeback wins. He did not have the greatest defense or running game to help out, but he has benefited from playing with receivers like Golden Tate and Michael Floyd. Some also say he doesn’t have the greatest deep ball. I would also have slight concerns about how he would fit in with his teammates based simply on my own experience with Notre Dame alumni who often seem to forget that not everyone has enjoyed
                      ...
                      -02-18-2010, 04:43 PM
                    Working...
                    X