Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Should position really matter?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • #1

    Should position really matter?

    Should the position a player fills on the roster *really* matter in the draft most of the time?

    I was thinking about this today when looking at the Carriker draft, with Revis right behind him. While hindsight is 20-20 in terms of who will actually get it done in the pros, a big part of why we drafted Carriker was position. If we actually thought that Revis would be a better pro, but were counting on Hill and Bartell was it the right thing to pass on him? Again in hindsight, probably not. Another situation of this ilk that's touched the Rams was the year Polomau was drafted and the front office reportedly liked him but didn't want to pay a safety that much.

    The reason I bring this up is not so much do criticize particular choices in the past (who knows, maybe they had Adam ranked higher...that's a different thread), but to ask the question -- should we really pay that much attention to position in the draft? Should we just get the most talent on the roster possible, with some exceptions, and figure the rest out later?

    And, if you think that's the case, who should we draft this year?

    Just wondering, I don't have an answer per se.
    Tags: None
  • #2
    Re: Should position really matter?

    Yes position matters. You are building a team and it takes a team to win. To do that you must pay reasonable prices for players that you can't replace at cheaper prices. The reality of the situation is that it isn't out of the ordinary (this year the exception) to find high quality free agents to fill holes at certain positions. Whereas other positions it is exceptionally rare.

    If you look back through history, QB, RB, OT and DE are of the highest priority in the first round. Why? Great ones rarely hit free agency. Other positions like DT, OG, C, LB and CB are easier to fill via free agency if you are in a pinch.

    Lastly, money is always an issue. Certain positions (the one's drafted highly) get paid more because of supply / demand. If you draft a DT and pay him $10 million per year, you are behind the eight ball. Most years you could get a very solid DT for less than that via free agency.

    Comment

    • #3
      Re: Should position really matter?

      Originally posted by RebelYell View Post
      Certain positions (the one's drafted highly) get paid more because of supply / demand. If you draft a DT and pay him $10 million per year, you are behind the eight ball. Most years you could get a very solid DT for less than that via free agency.
      Fair enough point and, like I said, I don't necessarily disagree. That said, would you rather overpay for Revis or draft Carriker (assuming you actually liked Revis better than Carriker ahead of time)?

      Comment

      • #4
        Re: Should position really matter?

        Think about it this way, what if the 1st round pick comes up and the BPA is a RB, then in the 2nd it's again a RB, then again in the third. How much do you keep drafting the most talented player when it isn't a position of need?

        Obviously an extreme example, but sometimes the BPA needs to take a seat when the position they play is already deep on the team.

        Comment

        • #5
          Re: Should position really matter?

          Right now the NFL is in passing mode, and any player that directly impacts that part of the game is probably going to get the nod over someone who does not. So the QB, LT, WR on offense, and the DE and CB on defense. You see these guys go very high every year, sometimes questionably high.

          However, I think it's been said by Devaney multiple times that it's the best player available that gets drafted for us. It's when the players are very close in value that it becomes position over talent.

          Comment

          • #6
            Re: Should position really matter?

            I think the position matters when you value the players in the first place. Certain positions correctly have a higher value. QB is obviously the most important, but it's one position where I would use a cut off. It's either a very high grade or don't bother - my only exception would be taking a project with a high ceiling for #3QB.

            When it comes time to pick, I pick the player I give the highest grade, but my grading system includes grading LT higher than RT and guard, cover CB over S. I'd consider need too, but only if the grades are close.

            Comment

            • #7
              Re: Should position really matter?

              Position can't be entirely ignored. Suppose that every round the guy who happened to be the highest on your board when you picked was a tight end. Unless you're Scott Linehan, you're not going to take 7 tight ends. You don't really want to draft somebody who isn't going to have much of a shot of working his way into the lineup. You have to look at how a guy will augment the roster to some degree.

              What you don't want to do is pick the position first and then fill in a name later. The Carriker situation always looked like a bit of a reach. Even if AC was the best DT candidate--it's not like Justin Harrell or Alan Branch are household names--at the time, there were still questions about whether we were getting the best value.

              Comment

              • #8
                Re: Should position really matter?

                The funny thing is that the Jets were supposed to be hot for Carriker. Now we know they wanted Revis, but when they traded up many people thought it was odd considering Carriker was off the board. He seems to be a prototypical 3-4 DE and we'll see how he does in Washington.

                Comment

                • #9
                  Re: Should position really matter?

                  Originally posted by berg8309 View Post
                  Think about it this way, what if the 1st round pick comes up and the BPA is a RB, then in the 2nd it's again a RB, then again in the third. How much do you keep drafting the most talented player when it isn't a position of need?

                  Obviously an extreme example, but sometimes the BPA needs to take a seat when the position they play is already deep on the team.
                  As an example, I think this does show the problem with ignoring position. But I also think it assumes that the grades on players are dramatically different, something that is probably *not* true the farther you move down in the draft. So, its more likely that the "clearly best" player on your board in the first round is in a position that happens to be RB, but when you get to the second round is the RB going to clearly be the best candidate or just kind of the best candidate? Maybe what that suggests is that position ought to matter more the deeper you get in the draft, with talent mattering more in the earlier rounds.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Re: Should position really matter?

                    Originally posted by Ventesette View Post
                    I think the position matters when you value the players in the first place. Certain positions correctly have a higher value. QB is obviously the most important, but it's one position where I would use a cut off. It's either a very high grade or don't bother - my only exception would be taking a project with a high ceiling for #3QB.

                    When it comes time to pick, I pick the player I give the highest grade, but my grading system includes grading LT higher than RT and guard, cover CB over S. I'd consider need too, but only if the grades are close.
                    This strikes me as a reasonable way to look at it, but I think that you have to be very careful in how much you weight position or else you end up with the good LT rather than the great RT. I think I'd prefer the great RT myself. So, maybe position is the "tie breaker" between similarly talented players?

                    I don't honestly know, I've just been pondering it a bit.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Re: Should position really matter?

                      Originally posted by chiguy View Post
                      Fair enough point and, like I said, I don't necessarily disagree. That said, would you rather overpay for Revis or draft Carriker (assuming you actually liked Revis better than Carriker ahead of time)?
                      If the players were rated equally, I'd take Revis over Carriker because IMO CB is more of a high priority position than DT. I didn't like the drafting of Carriker to begin with but that's easy to say now.

                      Looking at this years draft, I'll probably be completely wrong but Gerald McCoy is IMO that over rated DT that shows up routinely. He's a balanced guy with nothing horrible about him (except his strength needs to improve dramatically) but there is nothing premier about him. If I'm taking a player with the top 5 pick, I want to see something premier in him. I think Terrance Cody will be a better DT in the NFL because he's premier at one thing - run stuffing.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Re: Should position really matter?

                        Originally posted by chiguy View Post
                        Should we just get the most talent on the roster possible, with some exceptions, and figure the rest out later?

                        And, if you think that's the case, who should we draft this year?
                        Suuuuhhhh !! Then McCoy ... if he's there .. If not grab the best wr, rb, lb, or O-line available.

                        Comment

                        Previous template Next

                        Related Topics

                        Collapse
                        • ramsanddodgers
                          Diamond in the rough?
                          by ramsanddodgers
                          From STL today..... http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/spo...6?OpenDocument...
                          -06-13-2007, 07:08 PM
                        • Rambos
                          If it comes down to these two who would you take?
                          by Rambos
                          If it comes down to these two who would you take? Just pick one or the other.
                          Adam Carriker DE Nebraska
                          68.42%
                          26
                          Patrick Willis LB Ole Miss
                          31.58%
                          12
                          -04-02-2007, 09:45 AM
                        • jjigga3000
                          Let's play gm
                          by jjigga3000
                          A lot of us are talking about what we would do in this current situation, but there's not much we can do at this point. So with the current situation, what would do with this team this current upcoming season to turn it around immediately, to make this team a contender. Remember contracts still play a part, and there's the no cap free agency coming up, so the players we think will be there may not, and there's not guarantee they'll wanna play for the Rams. What QB would you bring that's gonna be better than Bulger? It's a lot to consider, it's not as easy as you think, I'm interested in seeing these ideas.

                          My first thing I would do is bring in a WR who can stretch the field, actually I'd bring in two, Avery is a great slot receiver, not a 1 or 2. Against a 3rd string DB he'd be a big threat. I'd also make sure one of the receivers is a big target. We can't afford to trade away any draft picks because you need to still build the team. I'd then bring in a good RB to spell Jackson, you need a great 1,2, punch that way when Jackson's out you don't loose production. Bulger is fine, with three targets to throw to he'd be fine.

                          I'd then trade Little for a 2nd or 3rd round draft pick, he's getting up their in age. I'd attempt to get a DE in free agency but if not I'd draft one in the 2nd or third round with LITTLE'S PICK. Carriker being gone is a big deal. I would stick with the 4-3 defense unless we could draft a big Nose tackle. I like bartell but I'd bring in another shut down corner and move Bartell to the two, and Wade to the three. I'd then use my draft picks to draft a QB, WR, DE, Safety, LB, G, NT, DB, not necessarily in that order. I'd use the draft to bolster our roster, and the same time find quality players with 1 2 and 3 picks.

                          Being it's Spags first year, I'd give him two more years to turn it around, but I'd fire Shurmer and bring in a proven OC. I feel if the offense plays better and stays on the field and score, we'd have a top 10 D.

                          what would you do?
                          -10-19-2009, 04:06 AM
                        • Guest's Avatar
                          7rounder , with 2 weeks to go.
                          by Guest
                          Even with the speculation that we might get Kris Jenkins , that does not change the fact that we still need more D-LINE help , and that does not change my opinion that i think we still need 2 -DE's and 2-DT's in this draft.so i gave it another try, i liked my first 7rd draft. but with HARRELL moving up , and some others shuffling up and down, this in my II version. please tell me what you think , i take all of your comments seriously to try to better my boards for my draft party.
                          1st- #13 - ADAM CARRIKER -DE
                          2ND-#52- TANK TYLER -DT
                          3RD-#82- CRAIG DAVIS-WR
                          4TH-#117- STEPHAN NICHOLAS-OLB/ to play SS
                          5TH-#148- JUSTIN WARREN -ILB
                          6TH- #190-CHASE PITTMAN -DE
                          7TH-#225-ANTONIO JOHNSON-DT
                          7s - #248-DESHAWN WYNN -RB
                          7s - #249- CHRIS DENMAN -OT

                          now i know that the RB and OT positioning in the draft might be a little low for some of you , and the 4th rd pick of NICLOLAS a olb, to play SS. might not be something that you would do. but in my opinion , and this is my opinion, FREE AGENCY seemed to bring in enought offensive weapons to go heavy on what we need , and i think that is to pump up the center of the defensive field with good talent and players that could help us this year, whether it be starters - sub's , or some special team play. i believe the first seven on this list can make the team and contribute in some way. so get the knife and start cuttin me up boy's. 2 weeks to go. KK
                          -04-14-2007, 09:57 AM
                        • RamsFan16
                          Regardless of what you think. Rams had good day
                          by RamsFan16
                          Alot of people including myself planned on drafting Jamaal Anderson in the First Round and trading our second round pick to Carolina for Kris Jenkins.

                          Well, we drafted Adam Carriker in Round 1, Brian Leonard in Round 2 and Jonathan Wade in Round 3.

                          So, the draft didn't go as planned but the Rams obviously believe we didn't need Kris Jenkins.

                          Alot of speculation going around from reporters and Linehan is that we plan on playing Carriker at Defensive Tackle. He is rumored to be able to gain 20 points to his frame and not lose a step, if so he'd be 310lbs and doesn't lose a step why wouldn't we be able to try and evolve the Defensive Tackle position and show you don't need a big tackle to hold up blockers, why couldn't we have two tackles which penetrate and make plays in the Backfield? I mean, if your pushing the offensive lineman back and into the running back they won't get anywhere. Carriker was a great pick, regardless of what it appears. I believe the Rams will give Kennedy another shot, but still draft a Defensive Tackle tomorrow.

                          This is what the Defensive Line will probably appear in certain situations.
                          Passing Downs:
                          RE Hall
                          DT Carriker
                          DT Wroten
                          LE Little

                          Rushing Downs:
                          RE Carriker
                          DT Kennedy
                          DT Wroten
                          LE Little

                          Other than Kennedy, looks solid.

                          Onto Leonard. Why do you guys not like this pick? He is actually a big play threat, and is a very good blocker. What if we would have drafted Pittman? or Hunt? Would you have been mad? Leonard is a great example of a Team Player and a Football Player. He played multiple positions and like I said is a big play threat. See his highlight videos', If Linehan was really worried about the Defensive line he would have panicked and taken one as a reach, to be honest there wasn't alot of good value on defensive tackles where we picked.


                          And Jonathan Wade. He's not the biggest guy on the field at 5'10" but is one toughest and quickest. Who would have thought Tye Hill would have excelled in his first season? Wade will be a fill in for a year or two but within' 3 years I believe he'll start. He makes some great plays, and will give up a play or two.


                          We filled 3 Needs, a Pass Rushing Defensive End and Run Stopping DT (Carriker (Nothing like killing two birds with one stone)) a Backup to Jackson (Leonard) and CB depth and eventual starter (Wade).

                          This was a very good first day, and tomorrow will be better.

                          :l
                          -04-28-2007, 09:26 PM
                        Working...
                        X