Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Commissioner: Replay Set In Stone

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Commissioner: Replay Set In Stone

    Tuesday, March 19, 2002

    By Vic Carucci - NFL Insider

    ORLANDO, Fla. -- For the first time in nearly 20 years, instant replay is not up for debate at the NFL meetings.

    And as far as Commissioner Paul Tagliabue is concerned, it should not come under review in the foreseeable future. "I think it's set in stone," Tagliabue said Monday.

    Or, at least for the next two years. In 2001, NFL owners put replay in place for three years, after a lengthy stretch of approving it only on a year-to-year trial basis.

    "I think the feeling is that it's been working well," Tagliabue said. "Generally, people are satisfied with it giving us the ability, which was the goal, to review the game-breaking call without interrupting the flow of the game."

    The commissioner touched on several other major topics during his first news conference of the meetings:

    On the potential downside of competitive balance, in light of the Baltimore Ravens parting with nearly half of the starters from their Super Bowl-winning team of two seasons ago:

    "You have to look at why teams can't retain their players, and in some cases it's individual decisions. Any system is as good as the people operating the system; any good car is as good as the person driving it. The system is an excellent system for teams like the Rams, the Raiders, the Broncos.

    There are a number of teams that are operating well within the system. You can have great competition around the league with a lot of competitive teams, but you have teams coming back (after a Super Bowl win) and competing, as the Rams have done and are well positioned for the future.

    " ... And you have to look at who is being released. Without getting into age-ism, some of the players who have been released are older players. Everyone gets old. It's even happening to Michael Jordan."

    On whether a flexible schedule, which would allow some key late-season Sunday games on CBS and Fox to be moved to ABC's Monday Night Football, could be in place for this year:

    "Yes. We've had a lot of discussions with the networks, and we're continuing to have discussions, and we will be visiting with them again in the next week or two to talk specifically about the schedule for the 2002 season. ... We will ensure that there will be attractive games in all the time slots on Sunday and on Monday nights. I think we can make it a win-win situation. We would make sure that CBS and Fox both have strong programming late in the season."

    On whether economics will cause all NFL games to eventually be televised on cable, which carries only Sunday night games (on ESPN):

    "The future I see is we will continue to have the mass of our games on broadcast television. We will be developing a number of different television offerings. We have plenty of opportunities to stay on broadcast television."

    On his suggestion that owners consider playing the 2007 Super Bowl in New York or Washington, partly out of respect for the victims of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11:

    "We have an interest in bringing our ultimate game to those markets. And it's not just a short-term consideration. Eventually, if we do our job right, people will see it has merit."

Related Topics

Collapse

  • jackson3909
    A possible longer nfl season??
    by jackson3909
    DANA POINT, Calif. (AP) -- More games that count, perhaps as early as August 2011? That's exactly what NFL commissioner Roger Goodell wants.
    There are several hurdles before the league can expand its regular season from 16 to 17 or 18 games. Among them is reaching a new collective bargaining agreement with the players' union.
    Still, the commissioner hopes to present a proposal to the owners in May after the matter was discussed at length this week at the owners meetings.
    "It's possible that we could vote in May, but we want to have core discussions on this," Goodell said Wednesday. "Anytime you have change, there is some reluctance. But it's clear we don't need four preseason games anymore."
    Goodell said the league has not seriously discussed the subject with its broadcast partners. He couldn't imagine them not being interested in more meaningful games.
    "I think the quality of NFL programming, that every one of our network partners would say, if they have the chance to have more regular-season programming, they'd be interested in it," Goodell said. "A key point is the fans also recognize players they want to see are not in those preseason games; that's why they are not attractive. They want to see those players play."
    As for those players and their union, Goodell recognizes an expanded schedule will be part of CBA negotiations. Owners opted out of the current deal last year, and it expires after the 2010 schedule, which would be an uncapped season.
    "Under the current agreement, additional regular-season games would not be covered," Goodell said. "I think our most important priority after we get done with our internal analysis is talking to our key partners, and that includes the players. I think we want to make sure that the right dialogue takes place before we make any final votes."
    DeMaurice Smith, the NFLPA's incoming executive director, wants any decision that affects the players to happen collaboratively.
    "His hope is that the concerns and interests of the players will be seriously considered," said George Atallah, a director at the public relations firm Qorvis Communications and a spokesman for Smith during his transition. "He was elected by the players to be their advocate on such issues and is more than ready to serve them."
    Among the issues team owners must discuss is when the regular season would begin; how many bye weeks would be scheduled; how deep into February the playoffs and Super Bowl would go; and when the offseason programs -- including the combine and the draft -- would be held.
    Plus, where would the extra games be played, particularly with 17 of them?
    One possibility, an idea Goodell and senior vice president of sales and marketing Mark Waller first mentioned several years ago, would be 17 neutral-site games, including some aboard. That would enable the league to step up its efforts...
    -03-25-2009, 06:45 PM
  • DJRamFan
    NFL tables late-season flexible schedule idea
    by DJRamFan
    By Richard Rosenblatt
    AP Sports Writer
    03/27/2002 05:29 PM

    NEW YORK (AP) -- The NFL ended its push for late-season scheduling flexibility to help ABC's sagging Monday Night Football ratings and will release the 2002 schedule on Thursday, The Associated Press has learned.

    Earlier this week, NFL officials met with executives from CBS and Fox, trying to convince them to agree to some flexibility for the final four weeks of the regular season.

    ``The league will use the same format as in the past for Monday Night Football,'' an NFL source said Wednesday on condition of anonymity.

    The schedule will be a bit different, though. With the addition of the Houston Texans, the NFL will have 32 teams grouped in eight four-team divisions.

    When the schedule comes out, marquee Sunday games on CBS and Fox will not end up on TV Monday night as NFL commissioner Paul Tagliabue had hoped. The NFL apparently felt that a regional-interest game today could turn into one of national interest as the season played out.

    But CBS and Fox were against the proposal from the start, citing the loss of a potentially competitive game.

    CBS Sports president Sean McManus had no comment. Fox Sports Television Group chairman David Hill released a statement Tuesday, after two days of meetings with the NFL, saying:

    ``We had a free and frank exchange of views on the topic and we expect the schedule to be released later this week.''
    -03-27-2002, 11:44 PM
  • Battering_RAMS
    Nationally televised games
    by Battering_RAMS
    I don't know how the NFL comes up with Sunday and Monday night game schedules but the Rams don't have one this year. That's two in a row now! I live in Florida and never get to see them on t.v. and think it's really not fair to the fans of teams with losing records. I always thought every team had at least one a year. Anyone else have an opinion on this matter?
    -06-05-2009, 11:10 AM
  • Truth
    8 Games is The Best they Can Do???
    by Truth
    NFL preps for possible 8-game season
    NewsCore 96Updated Jun 6, 2011 1:56 PM ET
    NEW YORK
    Despite recent developments in the labor battle that are seen as positive by some, the NFL is planning for a regular season as short as eight games, the Sports Business Journal reported Monday.
    The reported plan essentially means that in order to have a 2011 season a new collective bargaining agreement would need to be reached no later than early November.
    Under the reported plan, the eight-game season would start in late November and culminate with the Super Bowl in Indianapolis Feb. 12. The NFL has previously cleared the way for the Super Bowl to be played as late as Feb. 12.
    The league is looking to give teams five weeks before the season to sign free agents, hold training camps, and possibly play preseason games.
    According to NBC Sports' ProFootballTalk, the NFL has said it needs at minimum three weeks between a deal and the start of the season, making early November the latest possible date for a labor agreement.
    Lawyers for the NFL owners and players appeared before a federal appeals court Friday to argue the league's appeal of a ruling that invalidated the lockout.
    The court urged the sides to find a solution to the labor dispute, with one judge saying neither side will like the eventual ruling. The court is expected to take weeks to decide the appeal.
    The hearing followed three days of talks in Chicago that the two sides set up on their own without lawyers present.
    :mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:
    -06-06-2011, 02:51 PM
  • OldRamsfan
    5 Things You may not have Known: About The NFL
    by OldRamsfan
    5 Things You Didn’t Know: The NFL


    Its season is shorter and has fewer scheduled games than any other major American pro sport; nonetheless, the NFL has a firm hold on the title of "national obsession" in the U.S. In fact, it’s a Sunday and Monday night (and sometimes Thursday night) ritual from September through early February for its tens of millions of fans.

    As the nation’s top dog, the powerhouse league has faced more than its share of challengers through the years, all eager to get a piece of its hugely lucrative pie. They include the World Football League of the early 1970s, the USFL of the early ‘80s, Vince McMahon’s 2001 XFL, and (excluding the AFL of the 1960s) its toughest challenge, the All-America Football Conference of the 1940s -- none of which lasted beyond four seasons. The NFL has an impressive -- though not perfect -- winning record as the defendant in antitrust lawsuits, and its tremendous influence is slowly stretching beyond America’s vast and lucrative borders.

    Without further ado, we present five things you didn’t know about the NFL.

    1- The Redskins were the NFL’s last segregated team
    By 1961, 13 of the league’s 14 teams had, to some degree, been desegregated and featured black players on their rosters. The one hold-out could be found in the nation’s capital. The Washington Redskins were the league’s last all-white team, and whether it was coincidental or not, they were also the worst (from 1959 through 1961, their record was 5-30). Team owner George Marshall had staunchly refused to desegregate, claiming he would do so when the Harlem Globetrotters hired white players. That all changed with the incoming presidential administration.

    JFK had been elected, in part, thanks to his pro-civil rights platform, and having the league’s only all-white team in the nation’s capital was an eyesore for the administration. JFK, therefore, instructed his Secretary of the Interior, Stewart L. Udall, to threaten Marshall with federal retribution if the team didn’t hire black players; namely, they would be evicted from District of Columbia Stadium. In doing so, it became the first time in history that the federal government had attempted to desegregate a professional sports team.

    2- The NFL scores forfeits 2-0
    According to the official NFL rulebook, a forfeit occurs: “... when a game is not played because of the failure or refusal of one team to participate. In that event, the other team, if ready and willing to play, is the winner by a score of 2-0” (the points earned in a safety). Why a two-point safety? Because those points are the league’s only scores that are not credited to any one player.

    This little-discussed rule is even less frequently applied, since dating back to 1920 there has been just one forfeit. Specifically, December 4, 1921, when the Rochester Jeffersons lost by forfeit to the Washington Pros/Senators....
    -07-12-2013, 11:17 AM
Working...
X