Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who do you think we should get in the draft?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • #1

    Who do you think we should get in the draft?

    I was high on Sam Bradford in 2009, but after the BYU Cougars broke his shoulder I don't know. I like Tim Teebo and think he has the heart to play great football for us. I however want us to take a Defensive player in the 1st round. It would be good to cheer the Defensive side as much as the Offense like we did for Jones, Youngblood, Olsen, Greene, Dryer, Cromwell and who else.

    I think we sould get Ndamukong Suh first in the draft and wait to see if a good quarterback is still availible.
    Last edited by lordwhttgr; -03-14-2010, 11:17 PM. Reason: spelling
    Tags: None
    • #2
      Re: Who do you think we should get in the draft?

      We have drafted a D- Linemen twice in the past 4 years. I say go offense. We need a QB for the future. As much as I love Suh, I think we gotta take Bradford.

        Comment

        Previous template Next

        Related Topics

        Collapse
        • Bing69
          I still want Suh over Bradford
          by Bing69
          I know ill get bashed for this but i really think Suh would be the better choice as the no.1 pick. Now that Carriker is gone, we can forget about that 'we've made 2 high defensive picks in the last 3 years,we have to draft Bradford ahhhhhh' thing. We only have Long now.

          Lets think about our defensive line

          Long Ryan Robbins Little? Hall

          That line aint gonna do very well now is it. Especially if Little doesnt come back. Now if we draft Suh it will look like this

          Long Ryan/Robbins Suh Little?Hall

          Already looks more solid. Now what if we trade for Osi

          Osi Ryan/Robbins Suh Long

          That line looks like it could cause trouble.

          If we draft Bradford, sure the offense would improve slightly, or it could be just a dire. I understand the logic of picking Bradford, give us hope, a new face for the franchise etc. but Jackson is the face of our franchise. Maybe McCoy will be a wonderful hit (if we draft him)

          This is just how i feel, and i can say honestly if we pick Bradford tomorrow i will not be happy! But i will support the lad, and hope he brings the business. I just want us to shun the media and experts by taking Suh and continue to build a good , talented, young base which will put in a good position for years to come
          -04-21-2010, 06:58 AM
        • clarasDK
          So how many changed their minds since the end of the regular season?
          by clarasDK
          There is a lot off back an forth on taking DT or QB with our first pick.

          At the end of the season I had a clear feeling that most would want Suh, but now many want Bradford. So did you change your mind and if yes why?

          Until now Bradford has not done much do rise his stocks, only a good interview and maybe gaining some weight. Suh had a VERY good combine so he has done nothing to decline his value.
          I wanted Suh then and I want him now
          61.11%
          33
          I wanted Suh then but I want Bradford now
          24.07%
          13
          I wanted Bradford then but want Suh now
          0.00%
          0
          I wanted Bradford then and I want him now
          9.26%
          5
          I want somebody else
          5.56%
          3
          -03-15-2010, 03:18 PM
        • CanadianRamsFan
          What would you expect?
          by CanadianRamsFan
          I'm curious as it looks like, for the most part, people think it will be either Suh or Bradford. My question is what would you expect from them? If we draft Suh what kind of season do you think he would have? Same question with Bradford.
          -03-07-2010, 11:07 PM
        • AvengerRam_old
          Don't be that guy
          by AvengerRam_old
          Eventually, each of us will have to decide who we favor: Bradford or Suh/G.McCoy. We can only take one of these guys, and a choice will have to be made.

          If you find yourself in the Suh/.G.McCoy camp, that's fine. They are Blue Chip prospects at a premium position.

          If you decide that Bradford is the way to go, that's also fine. He is the concensus top QB in this draft.

          But, whoever you choose, don't make your point by needlessly tearing down the other player(s). I'm starting to see this on other boards... posters who support Suh/G.McCoy with over the top critiques of Bradford that make him sound like the second coming of Ryan Leaf... Bradford fans who are trying to convince everyone that Suh/G.McCoy are overrated players with high bust potential.

          Don't be that guy.

          These are all solid prospects and one can make a reasonable argument for any one of them (even G.McCoy - though I personally see Suh as vastly superior).

          This is NOT and easy decision. Even if it makes you feel better to argue that it is... it isn't.

          Seriously... don't be that guy.
          -03-23-2010, 09:06 PM
        • RamFan_Til_I_Die
          Why Draft "Experts" Annoy Me
          by RamFan_Til_I_Die
          I can't be the only one that gets annoyed by all these so called draft "experts" that change there mind like r8rh8rmike changes his underwear...about once a week. I'm going to use SI's main mock "expert" as an example. Not becuase he's the best, but because his past mocks are easy to find. H3e's just an example of what annoys me.

          Don Banks 2010 NFL Mock Drafts thusfar:

          Suh is a rock solid concensus as the surest thing. Sounds great, right?

          So roughly a month later, the day before the DT's do anything at the combine, the rock solid concensus is now split 50/50 and McCoy is our choice. Um ok. Nothing changed so why did his opinion?

          So because of one quote from Devaney, who is only making picks to save his job, we're now taking a QB in Stafford. Yeah ok, whatever you say Donny boy.

          Again implying they'll pick to stay employed rather than to make the pick that helps the team the most, while also covering his backside in case they don't pick Bradford. Pretty typical "expert" BS.

          Bradford had a good pro day so now it's a sure thing. OK now at this point I can see someone switching to Bradford as a possibility, but before no way. It just makes no sense. But even still what happened to Suh the "rock solid concensus as the surest thing.?"

          WOW. We sure did a 180 in two and a half months didn't we. First Suh is the "rock solid concensus as the surest thing" and now to take anyone but Bradford is "the kind of stunning turn of events we haven't seen in years."

          This is just one example of what annoys me about these "experts." McShay has flopped from Suh to Bradford also, while Kiper has flipped from Suh being "the most dominating defensive tackle I've seen in 32 years of doing this." to Clausen. It seems like they build up and exaggerate the plus side of whoever they want. For the longest time all we heard was Suh is a lock to go #1 to the Rams, and now it's a QB. Yes I know Blger is now gone, but these guys flopped to QBs while he was still here. Is it anything more than hype and these draft guys feeding off of each other that made Suh go from the guaranteed pick to now being the #2 DT behind McCoy in many people's eyes? I just don't get it. These guys annoy the crap out of me....
          -04-17-2010, 09:26 PM
        Working...
        X
        😀
        🥰
        🤢
        😎
        😡
        👍
        👎