No announcement yet.

Owners To Mull Rules, Bigger Playoffs

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Owners To Mull Rules, Bigger Playoffs

    Owners to mull rules, bigger playoffs

    Updated: March 19, 2014, 5:34 PM ET
    By Jeff Legwold |

    The NFL's competition committee will present a long list of potential rules changes at the league meetings in Orlando, Fla., next week but said Wednesday that the power to penalize players for use of slurs, including the N-word, is already in the hands of the officials and will be exercised in the coming season.

    In a conference call where it was announced that a discussion of expanding the playoff field from 12 to 14 teams is also on the agenda, the committee's co-chairmen -- Atlanta Falcons president Rich McKay and St. Louis Rams coach Jeff Fisher -- said enforcing the rule will be a "major point of emphasis'' in the coming season and a flag would result in a 15-yard penalty for unsportsmanlike conduct.

    "We do have a section of the book that deals with sportsmanship and addresses the use of abusive or threatening or insulting language, it emphasizes it can be a foul for unsportsmanlike conduct,'' McKay said. "It's right in the rule as it's written today -- rule 12, section 3, article 1B -- and we emphasize that we empower a foul to be called for that type of language.''

    "We have the current rule,'' Fisher said. " ... The N-word would fall under that category, the officials will be empowered to call a foul if there's racial slurs or statements about players' sexual orientation or even baiting the official in verbal abuse, falls under and ... it's going to be a very significant point of emphasis.''

    McKay and Fisher said there is a significant portion of the competition committee's report, which will be distributed to the team owners Monday, dedicated to sportsmanship. McKay said there were nine penalties called for taunting in the 2012 season, but the total increased to 34 last season.

    McKay said when officials meet with players during the preseason it will be clearly explained how it will be enforced.

    "We're going beyond the field of play, we're going to the workplace, we're going to respect to this game,'' Fisher said. " ... There's going to be numerous discussions with respect to the topic and we're going to move forward.''

    The expansion of the playoff field is not a formal proposal from the competition committee. The committee supported expansion of the playoff field at last March's league meetings and is expected to submit that support of an expanded playoff field once again when the report is given to the team owners on Monday.

    League spokesman Greg Aiello said it was not known if the owners would formally vote on an expanded playoff field next week.

    "With respect to expansion of the playoffs ... in last year's report, if you went back and looked at it, you would see we took a position on expanded playoffs and we supported the expanded playoffs,'' McKay said. "Likewise we have re-written that position ... it will be distributed to the members on Monday.''

    The current format of four division winners and two wild-card teams has existed since 2002, when Houston joined the league as an expansion team, bringing the membership to 32.

    Commissioner Roger Goodell has suggested a change to the one-point kick on extra points might be needed because they have become so automatic. New England has proposed moving the line of scrimmage to the 25 for a one-point try, but leaving it at the 2-yard line for a 2-point conversion.

    "There are a lot of different views in respect to the extra point,'' said McKay said. "There were 1,267 tried and 1,262 made [in 2013], and so there is that thought with the extra point maybe we need to add little more skill, and one of the ways to do it might be the way New England proposed.''

    Overall, the competition committee with submit 13 potential playing rules changes, seven potential changes to league by-laws and one resolution.

    The potential rules changes, many of which were submitted by either the Washington Redskins or New England Patriots, are:

    Move the kickoff to 40-yard line.

    Expand instant replay to include personal fouls.

    Eliminate overtime in preseason.

    Extend goal posts five additional feet above crossbar.

    Move line of scrimmage on an extra point to 25-yard line.

    Install fixed cameras on all boundary lines to improve instant replay.

    Allow coach to use replay challenges on bigger variety of plays.

    Tweak rules on blocks to defenders' legs to include penalties for blockers who roll up on the side of defenders' legs.

    Allow game official to contact central command center during replay challenges.

    Change rule to allow a clear fumble recovery even if play was blown dead on field.

    Take away stopping of clock on sack.

    Make pass interference line the line of scrimmage, instead of 1-yard beyond line of scrimmage to address contact on rub or pick plays.

    Change where defensive fouls behind the line of scrimmage are enforced.

    The by-law changes to be considered are:

    Increase gameday roster from 46 to 49 for regular-season games played on days other than Sunday, Monday or on the season-opening weekend.

    Increase practice squad to 10 players.

    Allow trades prior to start of league year.

    Eliminate cut to 75 players in preseason, only make one roster cut, to 53 just before start of regular season.

    Permit more than one player to return from injured reserve after at least six weeks on injured reserve.

    Allow additional time and testing of draft eligible players in weeks leading up to draft.

    Move final roster cuts before regular season to 4 p.m. ET on Saturday following final preseason games instead of 6 p.m.

    The resolution, submitted by the Indianapolis Colts would allow teams to open or close a retractable roof stadium at halftime. Currently the rule stats if the roof is open or closed to start the game, it must stay that way.

  • #2
    Re: Owners To Mull Rules, Bigger Playoffs

    Not many of "The potential rules changes" could have been submitted by the cheatriots, as they already have those advantages. With a lot of those rule changes, the rest of the teams would have a level playing field with them.



    Related Topics


    • r8rh8rmike
      NFL To Give Longer Extra Points A Trial Run
      by r8rh8rmike
      NFL to give longer extra points a trial run

      6 hours ago By Jim Thomas 314-340-8197

      ORLANDO, Fla. There was much talk but not a ton of action Wednesday when it came to a plethora of proposed rules and bylaw changes at the NFL owners meetings.

      The most notable change came in response to a New England proposal to move the line of scrimmage back to the 25-yard line on extra-point attempts. That proposal was tabled.

      But the league will move the line of scrimmage back to the 20-yard line for extra points on an experimental basis for every game played during the first two weeks of the 2014 preseason. In effect, that would make an extra point the equivalent of a field goal attempt of 38 yards.

      The idea is to make the extra point less automatic.

      "It's a new issue; it just came up this season" said Rams coach Jeff Fisher, a member of the NFL's competition committee. "We all feel like we need to do something (with the extra point). We're just not sure what we're going to do with it yet.

      "Everything spun off New England's proposal. We decided instead of putting it at the 25, go to the 20 and look at it in the first two weeks of the preseason to see if there are in fact things that come up."

      By "things that come up," Fisher meant any possible unintended consequences that arise from moving back the extra-point line of scrimmage.

      "The committee obviously historically has been very careful to make significant changes like that," Fisher said.

      Five proposals were passed Wednesday all by a 32-0 vote:

      Moving up the time of the final roster cutdown (to 53 players) by two hours, or to 3 p.m. Central time.

      Extending the uprights an additional five feet above the crossbar from 30 to 35 feet.

      Expanding the instant replay system to make recovery of a loose ball in the field of play reviewable.

      Keeping the clock running after a quarterback sack (outside of the 2-minute mark of either half).

      Changing the spot of enforcement for defensive fouls behind the line of scrimmage to the original line of scrimmage. (There were also some changes made on spot of penalty enforcement on running plays before a change of possession, and on post-possession fouls on punts.)

      Proposals that failed:

      Eliminating the roster cutdown to 75 during the preseason.

      Permitting coaching challenges on instant replay to all officials' decisions except scoring plays and turnovers.

      Permitting more than one player a season to return to the active list from the injured reserve list.

      Moving kickoffs to the 40-yard line.

      Making personal foul penalties subject to instant replay.

      These proposals...
      -03-26-2014, 03:45 PM
    • Nick
      NFL makes significant change to tackling rules
      by Nick
      NFL institutes 15-yard penalty, possible ejection for lowering head to make hit
      8:32 PM ET
      Kevin Seifert

      ORLANDO, Fla. -- NFL owners passed an unexpected rule Tuesday that will expand penalties for helmet-to-helmet contact, one that is more significant and far-reaching than the NCAA's targeting rule.

      Under the change, a player will be penalized 15 yards and potentially ejected any time he lowers his head to initiate and make contact with his helmet against an opponent. It will apply to tacklers, ball carriers and even linemen, and it will take the place of a previous rule that limited the penalty to contact with the crown of the helmet.

      The NCAA's targeting rule penalizes players only when they hit opponents who are in a defenseless position. It calls for mandatory ejections, but the NFL's competition committee has not yet addressed how ejections would be adjudicated, according to chairman Rich McKay. There is little doubt, however, that the NFL is determined to aggressively address a 2017 season that included 291 concussions, its highest total on record, and a severe spine injury to Pittsburgh Steelers linebacker Ryan Shazier on a play that would fall under the new rule.

      "It just seems that players at every level are getting more comfortable playing with their helmets as a weapon rather than a protective device," McKay said. "Therefore, we need a rule that is broad and puts that in context, and that's what we think this does."

      Players, coaches and fans were left guessing on how the rule will impact the game. NFL Players Association president Eric Winston took to Twitter to share his thoughts.

      According to NFL research, nearly one out of every two helmet-to-helmet hits caused a concussion in 2017. That's up from a ratio of one out of every three in 2015. NFL chief medical officer Allen Sills said in February that the current concussion data had sparked a "call to action," and on Tuesday he said this rule would be a key part of reducing head injuries in 2018.

      "We spoke previously this year of having an all-time high of concussions," Sills said. "And we said that wasn't acceptable, and that we would respond to this, and this was part of the response. This is a very key component of the injury-reduction strategy on how we can reduce concussions immediately."

      The competition committee initially planned to make lowering the helmet a 2018 point of emphasis rather than a rule change, McKay said. But after a leaguewide discussion Tuesday, owners instructed McKay to convert it to language that could be added to the rule book immediately. The league called a late-afternoon news conference and acknowledged that some parts of the rule still must be fleshed out.

      At the top of the list is how to merge a long-standing league ethos against two issues: wide-ranging ejections...
      -03-28-2018, 04:14 AM
    • r8rh8rmike
      Owners Pass Numerous Rule Changes
      by r8rh8rmike
      By John Clayton

      Apparently, the NFL is serious about putting safety first at this year's owners meeting.

      Owners passed four safety proposals Tuesday morning, a full day before they normally pass any rules involving action on the field. In past meetings, owners usually wait until Wednesdays to debate and vote on rule changes involving the game. The Competition Committee makes its annual report to owners on Monday, giving supporters or opponents an extra day to lobby for votes.

      When it came to safety this year, there was apparently no debate. Starting this fall, the NFL is going to outlaw the "wedge" on kickoffs, stop the bunching of players on onside kicks, protect blockers from a helmet-to-helmet hit from the blindside and save receivers from forearm or shoulder hits to the head when they appear to be defenseless.

      "We're trying to make the game safer for the guy getting hit and the guy doing the hitting," said officiating director Mike Pereira, who plans to retire this year.

      The safety change for the onside kick may seem to be a minor adjustment, but it became more important when the Competition Committee watched tape of violent collisions on onside kicks.

      In recent years, the league has tried to make onside kicks safer. Special teams coaches, however, found ways around those changes to group more players in smaller areas to gain an advantage. Under the new rule, players on the kickoff team will be spaced accordingly. First, at least four players of the kicking team must be on each side of the kicker. Second, at least three players must be lined up outside each inbounds line, including one who must be outside the yard-line number.

      The "wedge" has been part of kickoff returns seemingly forever. The wedge is simply three players lined up in a blocking triangle that a returner follows as it plows up the field against kickoff coverage. After watching years of tape, the Competition Committee felt the wedge was causing too many injuries. Starting this fall, no more than two receiver team players may intentionally form a wedge to help the returner. The penalty is 15 yards and will be enforced from the spot of the wedge. It will be called if three or more players line up shoulder to shoulder within two yards of each other to lead the blocking.

      The third accepted proposal involves a play in which Pittsburgh Steelers receiver Hines Ward made a block that resulted in a broken jaw for Cincinnati Bengals linebacker Keith Rivers. A 15-yard penalty will be enforced if a player delivers a blindside block to the head of a defender using his helmet, forearm or shoulder. The penalty will be enforced if a helmet, shoulder or forearm strikes the head or neck of the defender.

      The final change adds forearm and shoulder hits to protect defenseless receivers. In the past, officials gave an unnecessary...
      -03-24-2009, 03:38 PM
    • RamFan_Til_I_Die
      Owners to focus on integrity issues
      by RamFan_Til_I_Die
      NEW YORK (AP) -- Seven months after Spygate, integrity is still a fundamental issue for NFL owners.

      When owners, team officials and coaches gather for the annual spring meetings in Palm Beach, Fla. on Monday, the league's image will be a key component of several issues discussed.

      "We are determined that our game is clean and competitively fair," Ray Anderson, the league's senior vice president for football operations, said during a conference call on Wednesday. "We want integrity from top to bottom."

      Much of the agenda stems from Spygate, the episode in which a New England Patriots' employee made tapes of the New York Jets' defensive signals during the opening regular-season game. Patriots coach Bill Belichick was fined $500,000 for that; the team was fined $250,000 and lost its first-round draft pick.

      There also will be continued discussion of labor issues. Several owners have indicated recently the league is ready to opt out next November from the agreement that was extended in March 2006.

      That, however, is for the future. Integrity is now.

      Three weeks ago, in a letter to the competition committee, commissioner Roger Goodell proposed strengthening enforcement procedures for next season.

      While no action was taken by the committee, it agreed in principle to Goodell's proposal, which included a "whistleblower" provision that would protect anyone reporting illegal activity.

      Anderson noted improved technology will allow the league to more easily monitor and detect cheating. He also wants the standard of proof to be the same used in civil cases -- preponderance of the evidence -- rather than "proof beyond a reasonable doubt" needed in criminal cases.

      Spygate fallout also is evident in a proposed rule change that would allow defensive players to receive signals from the sidelines through a radio in their helmets. On offense, quarterbacks already receive radio signals from the sidelines.

      A similar proposal was rejected last year, getting 20 votes, two short of the 24 needed for enactment.

      Atlanta Falcons president Rich McKay, co-chairman of the competition committee, said the impetus from Spygate could help get the addition two votes.

      A third change with ethical ramifications would institute a five-to-seven day period before the start of free agency during which agents could contact teams about prospective free agents. No signings or contact with players would be allowed, but it would avoid what most league officials concede is widespread illegal negotiation before free agency starts. Earlier this week, San Francisco forfeited its fifth-round draft choice this year for "tampering" with Chicago linebacker Lance Briggs.

      McKay and Anderson, a former agent, both conceded tampering occurs.

      -03-26-2008, 08:37 PM
    • MauiRam
      Owners unanimous pass changes to three rules ..
      by MauiRam
      5/24/2011 10:59:06 AM

      Albert Breer of NFL Network reports NFL owners passed three changes/adjustments to rules relating to player safety Tuesday morning at their spring meeting, each by a unanimous 32-0 vote.

      The first change expands the definition of "defenseless player" in the "unnecessary contact" rules. Added are the receiver who "has not clearly become a runner," a kicker or punter during a return, a quarterback following a change of possession, as well as a player who takes a blindside block from an opponent "moving toward his own endline" and approaches from the back or side.

      "It used to say he was somebody who had not completed the act of the catch," Rich McKay, competition committee co-chairman and president of the Atlanta Falcons, told The Associated Press on Monday. "Now it will give a receiver protection until he becomes a runner and has the opportunity to defend himself.

      The second change make the league's "launching" rules more comprehensive, to include players who leave both "prior to contact to spring forward and upward," and a player who "uses any part of his helmet."

      The third change is more of an adjustment to rules prohibiting blows to the head of quarterbacks, making accidental "grazing" a judgment call for officials, rather than an automatic foul.

      In March, the owners made several changes to kicking rules. They moved kickoffs up 5 yards to the 35-yard line, kept touchbacks coming out to the 20 rather than the 25, allowed the number of players in a blocking wedge to remain at two and limited kick-coverage players to lining up 5 yards or fewer from the spot of the kickoff.

      They also voted to make all scoring plays reviewable by the replay official and referee.
      -05-24-2011, 11:17 AM