Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Confused....Help!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Confused....Help!

    I have only been REALLY watching football for 3yrs., so I don'y understand all the rules yet. I need someone to tell me why there were no penalties or anything even said about Marshall Faulks helmet being pulled off. The play was still in motion , it was clear to see, and guys were still piling on. I know we got the touchdown , but shouldnt there have been something?

  • #2
    There probably should have, but sometimes, there aren't. Best way I can explain it is: The rules are in place, but sometimes they aren't enforced for various reasons.

    Comment


    • #3
      You are definately right about them not being called. If thats the reason... we had tons of penalties against us that weren't called. I kept looking at My husband saying"shouldn't that have been called?" We won anyway, which is even more proof to the world we deserve the SB victory.

      Comment


      • #4
        Just goes to show, 28, sometimes you get the calls, sometimes you don't, just part of the game

        Comment


        • #5
          Hats off...

          Hi 28Rulz...

          From what I understand regarding NFL rules (and believe me, I'm f-a-r from being an expert), there was no penalty against the Eagles during Marshall's TD because the helmet was,

          1) Not removed intentionally: this may sound silly but just as with a facemask infraction, sometimes it is "intentional" and sometimes it isn't.

          a. For a negligence tackle or malicious grab on the opponent's facemask the penalty is a stiff 15 yards.

          b. For an "accidental" or quick-release of the facemask the penalty is cashed in with 5 yards.

          2) Football helmets are sometimes blown away as a result of the impact during a tackle or a block. If this is the occasion, I believe the play continues u-n-l-e-s-s [??? (that is, don't quote me on this one :-)] the player left without cranial protection STOPS -- a self-protective action which obligates the officials to kill the play and repeat the down.

          Again, ??? not sure if the safety of the player in this scenario MAY be determined by the player himself.

          3) Case in point. During the Nov. 4 NYJets / N.O. Saints game there was a situation where a Jet defender not only grabed Saints QB Aaron Brooks' face mask, but clearly held on to it while twisting the neck as he pulled him back over the pile of fallen bodies in an effort to keep him from making a crucial first down near the Jets end zone.
          That particular violation was most definitely a 15 yard penalty!*


          When Marshall Faulk lost his helmet in the NFC title game,

          a) it was during the struggle of getting into the end zone to score; there was no indication on the part of the Eagles of either removing the head gear negligently nor of taking advantage of him not having his helmet on;

          b) he kept the ball and continued pushing against the defense, i.e., kept on playing (courageously I might add);

          c) the play was being whistled dead at the same time; that is, it was finalized along with the stopping tackle which, in fact, removed the helmet accidentally. No further aggression took place.

          Personally, I think penalties that are closely related to the safety of the players, such as clipping or tripping from behind below the knees, roughing the passer (a somewhat ambiguous call), and late hits or tackles out-of-bounds are usually well policed by the officials. If anything, sometimes these calls are exaggerated or, at best, overly protective.

          Excellent question Ma'am!


          * In this incident however, Saints tackle Kyle Turley --involved in that play-- boiled over while witnessing the provoking penalty on his teammate. Going balistic as the play was being whistled dead, he grabs the facemask of the culprit, Jet defensive back Damien Robinson (still on the ground), yanks off his helmet then launches it away like a disc thrower!

          Turley was ejected from the game. He was also fined $25,000 by the NFL a couple of days later while Robinson was fined $20,000.
          :p

          Comment

          Related Topics

          Collapse

          • djccon
            No Whining!
            by djccon
            I haven't had the heart to read a whole lot about what others are saying about yesterday's game, but I'm tired of "the official's call." from what little I've heard. For ny to even SUGGEST Garnes didn't grab Canidate just dumbfounds me. How far did his jersey need to be stretched for them to feel the call was justified? Add to that, the possession on which they got their 3rd field goal - on which one of the ny DBs was hammering on Holt's arms WITHOUT LOOKING BACK FOR THE BALL. Where the he** was THAT call? There are FOUR more points on the board for us.

            I suggest ny should be THRILLED what the refs DIDN'T do to them. What about the repeated headlocks placed on Wistrom and Little that were NEVER called? The tackle where the guy grabbed Holt's helmet to pull him down - ummmmm, sorry folks, but you cannot use ANY part of a ball carrier's helmet in an attempt to tackle the runner - remember Fletcher getting that called against him (using the back of Deuce Staley's helmet to pull him down) in Philly?

            Props to the Giants and the scheme they put in place to throttle the Rams down. Don't cheapen by whining about it being taken away from you. You had as much given to you as you had taken away.

            As for us Rams fans, we all know we escaped by skin of our teeth. However, when you play a very GOOD team, play without your A game, and still win...well, that takes a GREAT team.
            -10-15-2001, 05:45 PM
          • hawaiianpunch
            What are the new rules of the NFL?
            by hawaiianpunch
            During the rams game, they blocked the field goal and returned it for a touchdown. I never knew, even if you don't call a penalty, you can go back and view if there were 12 men on the field. Im not sure if im a noob, or what. But set me straight on this one if i am wrong.

            But i have never seen that S***. I couldn't believe they went back and made a penalty when they did not even call one. I didn't think you could change a call, help me if im wrong. I might be and im not sure if the rams had 12 men on the field. I say we got robbed. Cause if Seattle wasn't getting called for off sides all day long i counted 4 times offsides, only once called. why not give us that touchdown? your thoughts?

            other than that the new rules in the NFL are tough to keep up with. Can some let me know what the knew one's are?
            -09-14-2009, 08:02 PM
          • jdpbmo
            reviewing calls from the booth
            by jdpbmo
            Okay, enough is enough. I can usually sit by and hold my piece, but I am so tired of this idiotic process the NFL uses to review calls. It isn't that I'm against the reviewing of questionable calls. I am 100 % for it. I want the call to be right. A noncall or wrong call shouldn't cost a team the game. It all came to a head in the Detroit/GB game when they didn't bother reviewing the touchdown late in the game. How crazy was that? If I was in charge of that part of the game, there would be some people looking for work tomorrow. My main problem with the process is that you are asking officials that make a call, or maybe don't make a call, to reverse their own decision. You are asking them to second-guess themselves or perhaps members of their crew. Now we can sit there and say "well, so what if they have to reverse a call to get it right". Hey, news flash, these officials have egos. They don't want to come out and say "sorry everyone, we just blew that last call". So they look at the replay to satisfy us, then come back and say "indisputable evidence to reverse the call on the field". That's a load of crap. There have been plenty of calls that they show that need to be reversed, but until you get a seperate crew of 2 or 3 people in the booth who do nothing but review a call when it's challenged, you will continue to see this craziness happen. Why wouldn't you have people not associated with the officiating crew reveiwing these calls? If you did, you would find a number of calls overturned when it's obvious they are wrong. You would find calls that are legitimate standing as good calls. People would be satisfied for the most part. Except for the Z E B R A S. They will find they are making a call or two incorrectly in important situations. But you know what else you are doing? You are taking some responsibility from them. What does everyone think? jd
            -11-25-2001, 07:37 PM
          • Barry Waller
            Rams Post Game Quotes From The Locker Room
            by Barry Waller
            A few quotes from the locker room after the game.

            While some may like to dog Pisa, at least he doesn't turn on the fans and takes responsibility. The fact is, Pisa is out of position in this D. HE is a "cover 2" Will linebacker or in the box safety "monster man" position, and when Haslett was hired, he would have been better off to leave as a free agent where they play that D , like the Bears, who have Urlacher in the middle to make the inside secure.




            LB Pisa Tinoisamoa




            (On how to explain the Rams poor performance)

            “Well, I don’t know how to explain it. I felt the energy was there today, just the execution wasn’t where it needed to be and I’m a little disappointed about that.”




            (On whether the Rams have reached the stage of embarrassment)

            “Absolutely, absolutely. You walk out of the tunnel and get booed by your own crowd and walk back in and be chastised, it’s horrible. It’s a bad feeling because I’ve heard the cheers and watched the 1999 film when the crowd was wild. It’s definitely disappointing, but understandable how they feel.”




            (On whether the Rams actually think and say they’re bad)

            “You could, but I mean that would probably be the worst thing to do especially right now because everyone understands what’s going on. There’s bad things we’re doing, but you can’t get in the tank and say we’re a bad team, that would be the worst thing to do right now.”




            (On why the Rams start slowly)

            “I don’t know the answer to that one, I wish I did and then I could probably be the head coach or a better leader on this team. It’s puzzling to see why it happens that way.”



            Referee Terry McAuley




            (On the Rams fake punt)

            “I’ll quote the rule. It’s rule reference 8-2-5, note 5 and I’ll read it. ‘Whenever a team presents an apparent punting formation, defensive pass interference is not to be called for action on the end man on the line of scrimmage.’ So there cannot be a foul for defensive pass interference for action on the end man on the line of scrimmage in an apparent punt formation.”




            (On why holding wasn’t called)

            “It was not deemed to be holding. I believe at that point it was just a low hit, so it was not deemed to be a defensive hold. It was deemed to be contact and there is not defensive pass interference.”




            (On if the contact was considered an attempt to tackle Rams S Eric Bassey)

            “It was not.”



            Head Coach Jim Haslett




            (On injuries)

            “Before the game even started C Nick Leckey had an ankle during warm ups....
            -11-23-2008, 04:19 PM
          • Fat Pang
            The first ten minutes.
            by Fat Pang
            I really wasn't sure which forum to put this post in. It's about football, but it's not about the Rams or the NFL. It's also very personal, or at least it's very personal in the sense that it's purely about my sensory perceptions of the first ten minutes of a football game from a players point of view. So, I plumped for the the default choice of the lounge, on the basis that in the unlikely event that I offended anyone with my musings, not very many people would see it.

            As I think we can all agree, whether Ram fans or not, (and there are some who grace our forums who add to this site and aren't) the start of the football season is something to be savoured and anticipated. We start thinking about the future as soon as our teams last snap is concluded. Whether we were happy with the achievments of our chosen team or not,the future provides the panacea for all ills. Anything is possible in the virtual nirvana that is the future. Worst to first in one season is possible, we all know it, so what's to stop us from dreaming?

            It's one of the best features of the human condition, a natural optimism, that, guided by the love of the sport, finds itself a comfortable chair, a jaundiced view and dreams of glories to come. I've already discussed this somewhere else of course, and informed you all of my intention to look for the best this season. I'm sincere in that and hope that I'm pleasantly surprised, but I realised this morning that as I did so, I was talking from a fans point of view.

            This is natural of course because I am an armchair fan, but I was also a player for nearly eight years, and so realised that there are other points of view to explore. Player and fan aren't necessarily related either. At college, I knew guys who loved playing the game and were very good at it but who hated watching it and regarded the three hours spent doing so as a complete waste of time. Happy to have their own bones broken, but not too interested in seeing others break theirs.

            So there is a difference that we often ignore when it comes to being passionate about the result of a football game and the outcome of a season and the vantage point from which you view it.

            We're all guilty of it too. How often have we screamed at the television, berating those players who are on the wrong end of a caning for not caring quite as much as we do? How often have we held them culpable for dashing our dreams? How often have we accused them of being paycheque(paycheck) players with all that is implied in that statement?

            I know that I felt that I had cause to do all those things for virtually the entire 90's.:x

            However at work this morning, whilst writing a lesson plan that would teach chinese children whose native language is Cantonese, to write Japanese Haiku poetry in English, (Not as hard as it sounds) I thought about this very pertinent fact, something I was surprised I hadn't considered...
            -09-06-2006, 06:36 AM
          Working...
          X