No announcement yet.

Here is a "Little" question

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Here is a "Little" question

    What will happen if the NFL suspends Little for a year or more. Or lets say he goes to jail for awhile. What happens to the Rams and the salary cap implications? Would he count? And if he did, why? Is this something the Rams are looking into?

  • #2
    Re: Here is a "Little" question

    I can remember HowardB saying something about an escape clause written into every contract (or maybe just Little's, not sure) about if a player cannot perform due to legal implications, then the contract is null and void with salary cap implications, i.e. Rae Carruth. Little should play all of this year, what is up next year is anyone's guess at this point.


    • #3
      Re: Here is a "Little" question

      so you are saying that a team can put in a contract that "if" something happens they are not responsible for the salary including what is reported the the NFL?


      • #4
        Re: Here is a "Little" question

        Originally posted by txramsfan
        I can remember HowardB saying something about an escape clause written into every contract (or maybe just Little's, not sure) about if a player cannot perform due to legal implications, then the contract is null and void with salary cap implications, i.e. Rae Carruth. Little should play all of this year, what is up next year is anyone's guess at this point.
        A sad but true necessity.

        Tx, I'm not sure I understand. I see where the Rams would be free and clear of the contracted amount if Little goes to jail, but what would the NFL do with the salary cap implications?
        The more things change, the more they stay the same.


        • #5
          Re: Here is a "Little" question

          Well, if someone is in jail they cannot perform their duties right? The NFL cannot punish teams for things legally out of their control especially if the clause is written into the contract which I do believe it is.

          Now, if Little was riding a motorcycle and breaks his leg....different story. However, especially in LL's circumstances, if he breaks the LAW and goes to jail, his contract I believe is null and void and the Rams have cap space. Cap space they don't want, but cap space none the less.


          • #6
            Re: Here is a "Little" question

            I recently asked Mr. B this question on the old site and here is what he told me. I am paraphrasing here.

            If he is convicted of a felony, we have the right to waive him. We would then be entitled to receive back from little the unearned prorated portion of the signing bonus. If we were able to get little to repay the remaining portion of the signing bonus that had not been allocated to the earlier years of the contract, we would then be able to have no adverse cap effect. If little didnt pay back the money, we are still on the hook for the remaining portion of bonus money that was paid, on an accelerated basis of course if we waive him.

            Recovering money from Little is tricky for many reasons, one of which is there is no way to know what his financial situation is, especially once he gets done paying his lawyers. You would hope he had the money available to pay it back, but whether he would do so is another story. He could declare bankruptcy and discharge the obligation all together, but only if he lacked the assets.

            should be interesting.

            ramming speed to all

            general counsel


            Related Topics


            • RamsFanSam
              Salary Cap/Contract Questions!
              by RamsFanSam
              I just finished reading an article that stated the Rams are still in fairly good shape financially. 11.5 million dollars UNDER the cap....not bad!

              But, with Leonard, Carriker, and Bulger left to sign, how will we fare?

              I guess that there will be about a 4 million dollar difference once these contracts are signed, leaving us with about 7.5 million.

              But, what about Brown's suspension? What happens to the quarter million he won't be earning? Does that go back into the kitty? Or, does that cash get forfeited by the club, too?

              Either way, with 7.5 million left this season, I would think that leaves us some space for a defensive free agent (if one comes available) plus a little rollover for signing Jackson next season.

              Of course, if I knew the answers, I wouldn't be asking. So, can someone tell me the answers?
              -07-15-2007, 09:47 AM
            • Nick_Weasel
              Some musings about why the Rams approach makes sense under new salary cap structure
              by Nick_Weasel
              There are different ways to build a roster in the NFL, and each team approaches it slightly differently. I've been doing a little thinking about how teams should adapt their approach based on the new CBA and the current trend of flat-to-slightly-increased salary cap each year. I think the Rams approach of not back-loading contracts and concentrating on locking up their core veterans years in advance both take advantage of the "new normal." A lot of this is just me thinking out loud so please correct me where I'm wrong.

              First, the issue of the (more or less) stagnant salary cap. This may change in the medium- and long-term, but at least for the next couple years the salary cap is expected to remain relatively flat. This affects the merits of backloading contracts and/or using huge signing bonuses to delay salary cap charges. One of the major advantages to delaying salary cap hits when the cap is growing rapidly is that the same charge is a smaller fraction of the salary cap in future years than in the current year. Let's say the salary cap is $100M (just to use a nice round number) and you have $5M in charges that you need to take. That's 5% of your team's salary cap. But if you delay the charge for a couple years to when the salary cap is (let's say) $125M, the same $5M represents only 4% of the salary cap. Salary cap inflation has solved part of the problem for you, essentially reducing the "cost" of that salary cap hit by 20% (from 5% -> 4%), while still allowing you to pay your player $5M in cash this year. If the salary cap remains at $100M though, 5% is 5% no matter when you take it.

              Second, the rookie wage scale. The days of massive (relatively speaking) rookie contracts are over. Sam Bradford signed a 6-year/$78M ($50M guaranteed) contract while a year later the #1 overall pick Cam Newton signed "only" a 4-year/$22M ($22M guaranteed) contract. But holding the overall salary cap constant, rookies making less means veterans making more. With players receiving a larger portion of their career earnings in their veteran contracts, it makes these contracts more important for them. It also means that rookies should put a larger premium on the safety of long-term contracts, especially if you are talking about offering players extensions while they still have a year or two existing under their current contract.

              For example, Sam Bradford should be less risk averse than Cam Newton when it comes to a 2nd contract - he has already made substantially more and so an injury/poor play affects his total earnings less than it would Newton. This means Newton should be more likely to accept a contract extension with a year left in his rookie contract, even if it means giving up a couple million over what he'd likely earn by waiting. A player like Bradford is better able to wait a year and test the FA waters because of the security his rookie contract afforded him (let's hope he doesn't!).
              -03-15-2013, 01:19 PM
            • itsguud
              by itsguud
              I already asked this question in a thread somewhere, but I can't find it or if there was a response. I was wondering if someone could explain to me how Salary cap works in terms of if we dump a player, how much of his contract/bonus affects the cap.

              -02-23-2008, 11:59 AM
            • majorram
              A question about the cap!!
              by majorram
              I keep hearing about this un capped year.. what does this mean?? and why are they having it???? cheers guys

              steve :ramlogo:
              -04-29-2005, 03:40 AM
            • Ramzilla
              salary cap question
              by Ramzilla
              If the rams were to release both MarK Fields(2.5 million) and Ryan Tucker(3.3 million), will the rams gain 5.8 million in cap space or will the rams take the hit?
              -02-19-2002, 04:58 PM