Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Early Season Stats

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Early Season Stats

    Here's where the Rams are, statistically, after only two weeks of play. I thought this might be interesting, considering the inconsistency around the league.

    *Despite numerous injuries to the secondary, the Rams are 6th overall in pass defense, but opposing offenses have only passed the ball 48 times, tied for second least in the league. Quarterbacks have completed 66.7% of their passes against the Rams, tied for fourth worst.

    *The rushing defense, predictably enough, is 29th overall. They've given up an average of 5.7 yards per rush, 31st in the NFL.

    *The total defense has allowed 6 yards per play, tied for fifth worst.

    *The kicking teams are awful, averaging 15.3 yards per kick return (4th worst), and Shaun McDonald averages 3.7 yards per return taking back punts. Meanwhile, the Rams have allowed 25.2 yards per kick return and 10.5 per punt return.

    *A year after leading the NFL in takeaways, the Rams are the only team in the league without a takeaway. Only two teams have one takeaway.

    *Despite being -5 in turnover ratio (second worst), the Rams' offense ranks 9th in total yardage. The group is tied for 4th with 6.3 yards per play.

    *They are middle-of-the-pack on third down (41.7%) but 2-for-2 on fourth down.

    *The offense is tied for 6th most penalties.

    *The passing offense is ranked 5th with 522 yards and the 72.3% completion rate is 3rd best. They average 8.57 yards per pass.

    *The rushing offense has totaled 206 yards, ranked 22nd. However, they are tied for 8th overall with 4.6 yards per rush. The fact that they've had (only?) 45 rushing attempts (tied for 6th least), explains the difference. They are one of ten teams without a 20+ yard run so far.

    *The team has scored only 3 touchdowns - 2 passing, 1 rushing.

    *Aeneas Williams leads the defensive team with 15 tackles. Adam Archuleta comes next with 13 total tackles.

    *Marc Bulger is ranked 7th overall with a 95.5 quarterback rating.

    *Torry Holt and Isaac Bruce are 2nd and 3rd in the NFL with 217 and 214 receiving yards, clearly placing them as the top receiving duo in the league. They are also 2nd and 3rd in receptions, but Bruce (17) beats Holt (16) by one.

    *The only players who have registered a sack are Pisa Tinoisamoa, Bryce Fisher, and Damione Lewis.

    *Only five players - Torry Holt, Isaac Bruce, Dane Looker, Marshall Faulk, and Shaun McDonald - have a reception after two games.

    *Steven Jackson is averaging 6 yards per rush (10/60).

    *The Rams have 5 more first downs (41) than their opponents (35).

    *The playcalling ratio has been 41% run plays, 59% pass plays.

  • #2
    Re: Early Season Stats

    Very interesting numbers. Thanks for doing the homework, Jake!

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Early Season Stats

      Let's just hope that Martz doesn't stray too far from his commitment to the running game. Besides helping the passing game, it's great for the defense and it's stats. Pound the ball and keep our D and the opponents O both off the field.

      Maineram :ramlogo:

      Comment

      Related Topics

      Collapse

      • RealRam
        Rams' among the BEST OFFENSES in NFL History
        by RealRam
        Before the L.A. Lakers had their Tinseltown fame and glory, the NFL Rams had Hollywood and most of Southern California since they moved to Los Angeles in 1946.

        Even in 1957, several years since the Rams had won the NFL Championship ('51), they would still draw huge crowds -- to the tune of 102,000 fans in the Memorial Coliseum. That was the 50s. Last century.






        Fast forward some 50 years and the Rams, now in St. Louis, suddenly became a marvel by virtue of their scoring prowess and precision. It was awfully exciting to see the Rams offense pour it on...



        *. GSOT
        *. MVPs
        *. Points galore / points machine
        *. Super Bowl XXXIV Champions, etc.





        In terms of offense = productivity + points (whether in Los Angeles or St. Louis), the Rams have had some VERY successful teams. Here's an interesting analysis of some of the best offenses in the history of the NFL, albeit calculated in 2007....
        -07-14-2013, 08:18 AM
      • HUbison
        Ineffective running game???
        by HUbison
        I'm not sure where the notion is coming from that our running game has been so blatently ineffective that Martz has to pass on 80% of the plays as he did against the 'aints. Our running game is 7th in yards per attempt at 4.7 yards per carry. We are one of only five teams that have no runs for more than 20 yards. (Translation: there aren't a couple of 60,70, or 80 yard anomaly runs skewing that yards per carry average.) Yet we are dead last in runs per game. And we have the lowest run-pass ratio in the NFL. Why must our run-pass ratio be so low?

        Some teams that are traditional passing teams, like Green Bay (who run 45.9% of the time, 3.9 ypc) you can understand. Or teams like Dallas (36.3%, 4.0 ypc) & Cincinnati (41.5%, 3.8 ypc), who are new-found passing teams. For that matter, there are the teams that are forced to pass more because of suspect RBs like Arizona (42.0%, 3.3 ypc), Philly (37.3%, 4.6 ypc), Miami (38.5%, 2.1 ypc), Tampa (35.2%, 3.5 ypc) or Detroit (43.7%, 3.5 ypc).

        And yet, with Faulk & Jackson and their combined 4.7 ypc (which is higher than every team mentioned above), we run less (34.5%) than any of them.

        Again I ask, why are we not running the ball?
        -09-27-2004, 08:56 AM
      • RamWraith
        How do you...
        by RamWraith
        ...go back to Faulk after a performance like that of Jackson's against one of the best run defenses in the league.
        -12-05-2004, 12:43 PM
      • ramsanddodgers
        Okay, Jackson ran for 1,042 yards
        by ramsanddodgers
        and only 16 Running Backs had more than 1,000 while another 4 had 900+.

        The question is, is 1,000 yards still the goal that it used to be?

        I realize that in today's NFL where the passing game is so much more relied upon that it may be harder to get enough carries to get the yards but one need only average 62.5 yards a game to get the 1,000.

        Averaging 75 yards a game will get one 1,200 yards and 93.75 will garner 1,500.

        Is it time to set a loftier goal for "premiere" runners or is 1,000 yards still going to be the 'magic number?
        -01-02-2009, 10:10 PM
      • RamFan_Til_I_Die
        Rams: Best NFL Offense of All-Time
        by RamFan_Til_I_Die
        Best NFL offense of all-time
        Page 2 staff
        http://espn.go.com/page2/s/list/nfl/offenses/best.html



        "Previously, Page 2 has listed the best and worst NFL teams of all time. Now we're going to be a bit one-sided and present our top 10 NFL offenses.

        1. St. Louis Rams (2000)

        St. Louis averaged 33.8 points per game in 2000, about a point more than in 1999, when the Rams were also an offensive powerhouse, and a couple more than in 2001. Those three years together guarantee the Kurt Warner-Marshall Faulk offense a permanent place in NFL history, but what makes the 2000 season stand out is that the offense did it with relatively little help from the D, which was the worst in the NFL. In their first six games, the Rams averaged 43.7 points a game. Then they were thrown for a bit of a loop when Warner missed five games with a broken pinky.

        But Warner, who played only 11 games, averaged 9.9 yards per pass attempt, and his backup, Trent Green, played eight games that would have been, statistically, the envy of just about any other NFL starter. Together, the two QBs combined for 5,492 yards in the air. Faulk, meanwhile, scored 28 touchdowns; he ran for 1,359 yards, averaging 5.4 yards per carry; he also caught 81 passes for 830 yards, averaging 10.2 yards a catch. Wide receivers Torry Holt and Isaac Bruce each caught 80-plus passes.

        The key here is the Rams' 2000 offense remained great despite Warner's injury and despite the fact every NFL defense knew what was coming. "The Rams created a mystique last year with how explosive they were," said Panthers safety Eugene Robinson late in the season. "Their defense could give up 35 points, and they'd put up 50 points. Everybody was like, 'Oh, man, they're the greatest thing since sliced bread.' Rightfully so. Now, all you need to do is have a very good defense, play sound ball, keep things in front, and don't give up the big play."

        Right.


        2. Washington Redskins (1983)

        The '83 'Skins scored 541 points during the regular season, the second-highest total in NFL history, and, except for their 38-9 Super Bowl loss to the Raiders, never scored fewer than 23 points in a game. How'd they do it? Joe Theismann, John Riggins and the Hogs. Theismann completed 60 percent of his passes for 3,714 yards and 29 TDs. Riggins carried 375 times, bulldozing his way to 1,347 yards and 24 TDs. They had some help, too -- from Joe Washington, who rushed for 772 yards, an average of 5.3 per carry, and caught 47 passes; from wide receiver Charlie Brown, who caught 78 passes for 1,225 yards and eight TDs; from Art Monk, who played only 12 games but caught 47 passes; and from kicker Mark Moseley, who booted 161 points through the uprights.

        3. Minnesota Vikings (1998)

        The 15-1 Vikings broke Washington's offensive scoring mark (see above)...
        -10-19-2006, 01:31 PM
      Working...
      X