Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Best Backs in the West? Sando thinks so..

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Best Backs in the West? Sando thinks so..

    Rating running backs in the NFC West
    August 27, 2009 2:55 PM

    Posted by ESPN.com's Mike Sando


    The Seahawks' decision to sign 31-year-old Edgerrin James and confer upon him "complementary" status behind "workhorse" Julius Jones showed what the team thought about its quality depth at running back: not a great deal.

    The move upgraded the position, in my view, because James is better suited than was T.J. Duckett to step into the lineup on a full-time basis if needed.

    But the Seahawks still might be chasing the rest of the NFC West at the position.

    James' signing provides an opportunity to size up the position across the division.

    I ranked each team's situation at running back in my mind before calling Matt Williamson of Scouts Inc. to talk through each situation. He felt more strongly than I did about ranking the Rams' situation No. 1, ahead of the *****' situation. We agreed on ranking the Cardinals' running backs third, ahead of the Seahawks' backs.

    Rankings and explanations follow:

    1. St. Louis Rams


    Current backs:
    Steven Jackson, Samkon Gado, Antonio Pittman, Kenneth Darby, Chris Ogbonnaya, Mike Karney (FB), Jerome Johnson (FB)

    Williamson's take:
    "Adrian Peterson is the best back in the league and I would probably give the No. 2 honor to DeAngelo Williams right now, but then Steven Jackson is right there -- if healthy, of course. I think he'll get a ton of touches there. They are installing more of an Eagles-type offense. He'll be a bigger, badder version of Brian Westbrook and catch a lot of balls. He will also be the focus of every defense and there could be a greater chance of injury. Karney is a little more athletic than some of the pure straight-ahead hammer blockers. He has had injury problems, too."

    My take:
    The *****' overall depth at running back appeals, but Jackson is unquestionably a special player athletically, more so than any back in the division. Special traits always appeal to the scout, which might explain why Williamson was quick to rank the Rams' running backs ahead of those in San Francisco. From my perspective, the Rams' situation at running back might be best in the division while it lasts. I question whether Jackson can hold up for a full season. The drop-off from Jackson to the next guy -- whoever it might be -- will be more dramatic than elsewhere in the division. That's another reason I'm a little nervous about ranking the Rams' running backs No. 1.

    2. San Francisco *****


    Current backs: Frank Gore, Glen Coffee, Michael Robinson, Kory Sheets, Moran Norris (FB), Bill Rentmeester (FB), Brit Miller (FB)

    Williamson's take:
    "I like Gore as well. I would say he is more of the fifth- to 10th-best back in the league. I do not think his skills are as impressive as Jackson's skills. He is also going to be a jack-of-all-trades and get a ton of touches, but his job will be a little easier because I think their passing game will be more respectable than St. Louis' passing game. Of the fullbacks, I like Norris probably the best in the division. He will help Gore's cause. I don't think that is a determining factor one way or another, though."

    My take:
    Gore has shown signs of wearing down late in seasons. He could be at additional risk as the team commits more fully to a run-oriented power scheme. But his toughness and running style earn him high marks. He's enjoying a sensational summer and offensive coordinator Jimmy Raye has said Gore will matter more than the quarterback. All signs point to Gore revisiting the production level he enjoyed during the 2006 season. And with Coffee breaking out in the preseason, the ***** appear better protected than the Rams if their starter gets hurt.

    3. Arizona Cardinals


    Current backs: Tim Hightower, Beanie Wells, Jason Wright, LaRod Stephens-Howling, Chris Vincent, Dan Kreider (FB), Tim Castille (FB), Reagan Maui'a (FB)

    Williamson's take:
    "James is more proven than Hightower, but Hightower is cheaper. I don't think he is a special player at all. He has had a better preseason than I expected, but he does not bring any special quality to the table. He is not an extremely powerful player, he is not going to wear down defense, his pass-catching skills are ordinary, he is not a make-you-miss guy and he is not a speed player. Wells has the most talent of any back in Arizona or Seattle."

    My take:
    Cutting James and adding Wells is like moving money from a savings account into something riskier. James was never going to pay off big at this stage of his career. Wells has the talent to complete an already productive offense, but it's tough to believe he'll be healthier in the NFL than he was in college. I know he didn't miss many games at Ohio State, but he's already missed a bunch of training camp. The burden of proof is on Wells at this point. Hightower has been more productive in the preseason because he has taken the opportunity seriously. He looks leaner and quicker than he was last season. The Cardinals can get more from this position by resisting the temptation to throw so frequently.

    4. Seattle Seahawks


    Current backs:
    Julius Jones, Edgerrin James, Justin Forsett, Devin Moore, Owen Schmitt (FB), Justin Griffith (FB), Dan Curran (FB), David Kirtman (FB)

    Williamson's take:
    "I don't trust Jones to carry the load. I probably like him better than Hightower, though. I don't like him as a No. 1, but I don't know if either team has a No. 1 right now. Wells has the best chance. Jones is a complementary player, a gets-what-is-there kind of back. I don't think he is a great receiver or anything. He is not tremendously powerful or elusive. Justin Forsett is probably the most intriguing back between Arizona and Seattle. With Edgerrin James, I don't have a lot of faith in him. One thing people don't understand about his game, though, is that he is a great pass-protection back. He will be used more out of the backfield than he was the last couple years, especially with Seattle's offensive line being shaky. He can grind out some yards and could be good in the red zone."

    My take:
    The Seahawks haven't targeted the position early in the draft recently and it shows. Paying Shaun Alexander all that money a few years ago set back the position. The team wasn't going to immediately invest as much in a replacement. Jones and James are both very good in pass protection, though, and I think that will help the offense more than the running stats will show. This looks like a pass-first team on paper. We'll find out whether the zone blocking scheme can manufacture production. Having the same five offensive linemen for more than a week or two would certainly help. Forsett has been the Seahawks' most impressive back this summer.

    **no idea why i added the Sando part in thread title**
    Last edited by unorthodox1999; -08-27-2009, 09:06 PM.

  • #2
    Re: Best Backs in the West? Sando thinks so..

    Can't argue with that, but he mentioned what we are all worried about...

    JACKSON NEEDS TO STAY HEALTHY!

    When Jackson is healthy, the Rams are healthy.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Best Backs in the West? Sando thinks so..

      Yeah Moose, I can't argue at all with the two opinions. Jackson's the best back in the whole division, but the dropoff is also the greatest behind him. Hopefully Gado will keep proving himself to be a good number two behind him though! If a good back falls to us in the next draft(3rd roundish?) though, I would not be surprised to see us grab him if only for depth security.
      I believe!:ram:

      Comment

      Related Topics

      Collapse

      • Richbert88
        Dan Pompei - Prognosticators beware
        by Richbert88
        PART #1

        Prognosticators beware
        Don't even try to figure out the final ending to what could be NFL's most competitive division

        Dan Pompei
        August 22, 2007

        ST. LOUIS - If there is one division in football that is almost certain to spring a surprise or four on us, one division whose teams are as unpredictable as sparks from a bonfire, it is the NFC West.

        Just last season the last-place Cardinals went 4-2 against division opponents. The third-place ***** beat the first-place Seahawks twice. Although the Rams started the season by winning four of five and ended by winning three straight, they lost seven of eight in between.

        And thanks to an influx of men like ***** cornerback Nate Clements, Cardinals head coach Ken Whisenhunt, Rams defensive tackle Adam Carriker and Seahawks safeties Deon Grant and Brian Russell, the NFC West has become less predictable than ever.



        "I think our division would be the most fun in football if you look at it from a fan's perspective," Rams coach Scott Linehan said. "Anybody can beat anybody. I think we all improved our teams. I'm not sure you can say that everywhere. In our division there were high-quality free agents signed by all four teams, and all four teams drafted guys who will help them this year, not just three or four years away."

        Whisenhunt has a similar perspective:

        "There are a lot of positive things going on with each team in the division, so it's an unpredictable division."

        Many fans believe a "surprise team" will emerge from the NFC West. But many disagree on who it will be.

        The Seahawks would be a surprise team only if they failed to play well. Expectations remain high for the team that has won three straight division titles and has the best record in the NFC over the last four years. The Seahawks won the division last season even though quarterback Matt Hasselbeck and running back Shaun Alexander missed 10 starts between them because of injuries. With both players healthy this season, Seattle looks better than a nine-win team.

        The Cardinals could surprise if the team takes to Whisenhunt's program and second-year quarterback Matt Leinart starts to fulfill the potential that allowed him to achieve the second-highest winning percentage in NCAA history. Whisenhunt has reason to believe Leinart will be a different player this season.

        Whisenhunt said Leinart has improved his footwork on drops, which is critical because Leinart's footwork was sloppy last season. He also said Leinart has become better at throwing with anticipation.

        "For him to get to the next level where he can be a really top quarterback, he has to make more throws in which he anticipates the holes, he trusts his receivers even if they aren't out of the break and he puts the ball...
        -08-23-2007, 01:31 PM
      • A-Web
        RB Depth and the 35th Pick
        by A-Web
        Not that I believe we have a bad running game. Obviously when Jackson is healthy it is one of the most dangerous in the league. Well, if our O-Line could produce for him. And I am sure they will in the near future.

        Anyways, I was just wondering, because I was browsing some mocks and found something interesting.

        In most mock drafts, it seems that there is only a single running back coming off the board in the first round. Knowshon Moreno. One draft, by Charles Davis of NFL.COM, whom I highly regard for his articles and opinions, had Knowshon as the only RB taken in round one. And the sad part was, he had him going to the Chargers. Recently, however, the Chargers have struck a deal with LT and now have both LT and Sproles in the bank. He has edited his post to

        "This could easily become LB Rey Maualuga, especially since L.T. just signed."

        So being that fact, it seems there is a potential major slide at RB like the WRs had last season. There may be none taken in the first round. If that is the case, and Knoshon Moreno doesn't go in the first, and Chris Wells doesn't go in the first, what happens to them then?

        Well I for one have watched both of the backs throughout their last season campaigns, and still cannot see how some people believe Knowshon is better than Chris Wells. Everybody claims that Wells has trouble with injuries, yet it was basically a single injury in his entire 3 years as the Running Back for the Buckeyes. Yes he had some on and off trouble with his ankle after that point, but that is what happens to everyone in the NFL too. When you are mid-season, and you are hurt, you have to try to recouperate while at the same, when you are healthy enough to go on any particular week, you go. Sometimes that causes some setbacks, but when your team needs you to perform you have to.

        Unlike the NFL where you can afford to have a couple losses, sometimes up to 8 in a really poor division (Chargers / Broncos / Arizona Cardinals), in NCAA football, a single loss can be the difference between being in the Big Game, and not being in the Big Game. So it makes sense that moreso than ever, you would not be able to sit on any given week because if your team loses because you didn't play, that's it. You just have to go out there, do your best, and hope it doesn't get aggrovated. Wells is healed up, showed amazing skill and ability in the combine and pro day, and is ready to roll.

        Not to take away from Knowshon Moreno. For a guy to come into the Georgia starting lineup after red-shirting his freshman year, he performed outstandingly. 1336/1400 being his two seasons total rushing yards, while averagine a 5.4/5.6 respectively. 30 TDs in 2 years is amazing, and add to that two reception touchdowns in his senior '08 season, and he can play from the backfield as receiver too. 253/392 yard seasons in receptions with an avg of 12.7/11.9. Something to note...
        Neither Running Back
        81.82%
        18
        Moreno, and utilize split carries
        9.09%
        2
        Wells, and utilize split carries
        4.55%
        1
        Moreno as a pure backup
        0.00%
        0
        Wells as a pure backup
        4.55%
        1
        -03-15-2009, 08:22 AM
      • r8rh8rmike
        Ground Games Set To Take Over For Aerial Shows In NFC West
        by r8rh8rmike
        Ground games set to take over for aerial shows in NFC West
        By Bucky Brooks | NFL.com

        After watching the NFC West field some of the most prolific aerial attacks in the league throughout the years, fans and observers should take note of the dramatic transformation that is set to unfold within the division in 2009. Led by three new defensive-minded coaches intent on constructing teams built for the postseason, the NFC West will see the running game emerge as the new blueprint for success this season.

        Coaches from defensive backgrounds have universally believed that a stout defense and strong running game lead to wins, and that notion has been bolstered by the fact that six of the top seven rushing offenses in the league earned playoffs berths in 2008. With that in mind, it's not surprising that San Francisco's Mike Singletary, St. Louis' Steve Spagnuolo and Seattle's Jim Mora have initiated their rebuilding efforts with the ground game as the focal point.

        In San Francisco, Singletary immediately changed the focus of the team's offense upon taking over the helm toward the middle of last season. He has continued to make the running game the emphasis during the offseason. Singletary dumped pass-happy offensive coordinator Mike Martz at season's end after the team ranked 27th in rush offense (99.9) and attempts (24.8) despite the presence of Frank Gore.

        In his place, Jimmy Raye steps in to install a run-first attack built around Gore's impressive talents. The four-year veteran has compiled three straight 1,000-yard seasons, including a stellar 2006 campaign when he finished as the league's third-leading rusher. As a hard-nosed runner with explosive power and pop, Gore is built to handle a heavy workload as a featured back.

        Although he only had three games with 20 or more carries last season, it shouldn't come as a surprise to see Gore routinely tally 20-25 carries per game with the team's lingering questions at quarterback. With a career record of 13-3 when Gore carries the ball 20 or more times, the prospect of riding the former Pro Bowler should be the Niners' recipe for success.

        For the Rams, it's obvious that Spagnuolo is making the running game the backbone of their offensive attack. With young talent abound at the skill positions, the team is depending on former Pro Bowler Steven Jackson to act as the centerpiece of the offense. The five-year veteran has surpassed the 1,000-yard mark in four consecutive seasons and is one of the most talented runners in the league.

        Jackson, who earned a Pro Bowl berth in 2006 after amassing 2,334 yards from scrimmage, is a big, bruising runner with deceptive speed and quickness. He has the ability to grind it out between the tackles while also flashing the burst to turn the corner on outside runs. Though he missed four games last season due to injury, Jackson is a proven workhorse who gets better with...
        -05-26-2009, 04:40 PM
      • r8rh8rmike
        NFL Nation: 4 Downs--NFC West
        by r8rh8rmike
        NFL Nation: 4 Downs -- NFC West

        May, 29, 2014
        By ESPN.com staff | ESPN.com

        By almost everyone’s estimation, the rough and rugged NFC West was the best division in the NFL in 2013. It had the Super Bowl champion Seattle Seahawks, two teams in the NFC Championship Game (Seattle and the San Francisco *****) and another 10-game winner in the Arizona Cardinals. The St. Louis Rams were 7-9 but likely would have had a winning season in any other division.

        And now? Other than adding Godzilla and three superheroes to the four teams, they could not get much better. It looks like the big boys on the NFC block will remain out west.

        Most experts believe the Rams had one of the best drafts in the NFL, adding Auburn offensive tackle Greg Robinson and Pittsburgh defensive tackle Aaron Donald, giving St. Louis four first-round picks on what is arguably the best defensive line in football.

        The ***** had 12 draft picks, including seven in the first four rounds, and made a trade during the draft for talented Buffalo receiver Stevie Johnson.

        The Cardinals signed gigantic left tackle Jared Veldheer and blazing kick returner Ted Ginn in free agency. They also added a vicious hitter, Washington State safety Deone Bucannon, with their first draft pick.

        As always happens with Super Bowl champs, the Seahawks lost a few key players to free agency, but they kept the man they really wanted to keep in defensive end Michael Bennett and locked up "Legion of Boom" stars Earl Thomas and Richard Sherman to long-term deals.

        Believe it or not, the best division in the NFL just got better.

        First Down

        As usual, the Seahawks drafted some players other teams would have taken later, if at all. Should people question their choices, or have they earned the benefit of the doubt?

        Terry Blount: Have we learned nothing from the past? Questioning Seattle's draft strategy, along with undrafted signees, now seems a little foolish. Shall I name a few who stand out that other teams passed up or the experts questioned? Sherman, Russell Wilson, Doug Baldwin and Malcolm Smith, for starters. The Seahawks bring in players with specific traits -- unusual athleticism, driving competitiveness and obvious intelligence. Where those players rank on another team's draft board means nothing to them. And at first glance from rookie camp, they found some winners in receivers Paul Richardson and Kevin Norwood, along with defensive end Cassius Marsh.

        Nick Wagoner: At this point, it's hard to argue with the results the Seahawks are getting from the players they draft. It is interesting that it seems like the first-round picks (such as James Carpenter and Bruce Irvin) are the ones who seem to struggle most relative to draft position. But the thing Seattle does so well is find players who fit the confines of who they want to be on both...
        -05-30-2014, 01:30 PM
      • RamDez
        The ‘Hawks? In 2004, It’s a Lock!
        by RamDez
        The ‘Hawks? In 2004, It’s a Lock!
        By Seahawks.net Doug Farrar

        However, before the Seahawks can take their “rightful place” at the top of the NFC West, there’s a bit of knocking off to do…the 2003 Division Champion St. Louis Rams are still a serious threat, they’re the established winners, and they’ll be a headache all year. So, in the spirit of competition (and to hopefully establish a friendly rivalry between Seahawks.NET and GridironGateway), I thought it was high time that a fan of each team state their case. You’ll read the take of my esteemed adversary David Spalter (also known as "AvengerRam" on the ClanRam forums) not to mention my rebuttal…and here’s why I believe that the NFC West crown in 2004 can only go to our Seahawks.

        Let’s get the obvious out of the way first…the Seahawks and the Rams are the only two teams with a real shot at the division, a fact to which even the most ardent ***** and Cardinals fans would have to bend. The Cardinals might be a team to look out for down the road (hiring Denny Green and drafting Larry Fitzgerald and Darnell Dockett will do that…they might even play spoiler this year), but the Niners are smack-dab in the middle of what they want their fanbase to believe is an intelligent, reasoned “rebuilding program”. Uhhh…sure. According to .NET salary cap guru “The Hawkstorian”, SF has around $20 million in total 2004 cap hit reserved for players that aren’t even on their ROSTER…what else are they going to say? All I know is that the next time I’m playing poker, I want at least one ***** executive at the table. It’s clean-up time!

        The Draft/Free Agency: The Rams’ first-round pick of RB Steven Jackson may have been a good choice in theory, but in practice, this is a case where going “Best Player Available” may hurt them in the end. By taking Jackson and passing over several notable (and desperately needed) defensive players, St. Louis, in the words of Little Richard, “got what they wanted and lost what they had”. With Grant Wistrom off to Seattle and Leonard Little’s future in serious doubt (a situation which had availed itself at the time of the draft), the Rams come into 2004 with major potential deficiencies on the line. The Rams pulled off what could be their best reach pick in the sixth round with QB Jeff Smoker, who could be great and only dropped so far due to personal issues that Smoker himself sorted out. Don’t know why, but there’s a little part of me that’s rooting for him to make it work.

        The Seahawks, in passing up Jackson and selecting Texas DT Marcus Tubbs, addressed need first. Seattle also drafted for potential (FSU linebacker Michael Boulware, who will be converted to safety), and depth in the offensive line (T/G Sean Locklear). They may have a steal of their own with fifth-round pick WR D.J. Hackett, a tough, smart potential possession receiver.

        While it’s difficult to grade drafts at the time they happen...
        -05-28-2004, 12:47 AM
      Working...
      X