Tweet
Lets talk about this for a second. I have to say i was a bit shocked by what happened after the block. I have never heard of reviewing a play to call a penalty. I might be playing a little devil's advocate on this one and i dont know how the rule is written, but can coaches or the booth challenge a play if they see holding or pass interference that isn't called by the refs?
-
-
Re: The Called Back TD
You can't challenge non-calls, with the exception of too many men on the playing field (to my knowledge). this isn't the first time I've seen it reviewed, but definitely the most game-changing. No excuse for whoever was at fault there. -
Re: The Called Back TD
We had quite a discussion about this in the chatroom when it happened.
A coach cannot challenge a penalty (or the lack of a call). The lone exception to this rule is 12 men on the field. That IS reviewableComment
-
Re: The Called Back TD
learn something new every day. ThanksComment
-
Re: The Called Back TD
That's funny, when Bulgers on the field, there's only 10 men!sigpicComment
-
Re: The Called Back TD
I really am amzed you can take a thread that has nothing to do with marc bulger and somehow turn it into a bash thread. You sir deserve an award.Originally posted by dgr828 View PostComment
-
Re: The Called Back TD
I don't think the coach can challenge it...it is a booth review only so it is only a factor in the last 2mins of a half. That's at least what I gathered during my quick scan of the rulebook while watching the game and also chattingOriginally posted by ScottD413 View Post
Comment
-
Re: The Called Back TD
I think this was the morale buster for the entire team. We played well until that happened. From there, we really fell apart.Comment
-
-
Re: The Called Back TD
This was the straw that broke the camel's back as far as momentum and inspiration goes. It truly was a game changer...Comment
-
Re: The Called Back TD
I am pretty impressed that you can quick scan an 800 pg rule bookOriginally posted by bradwill View PostI don't think the coach can challenge it...it is a booth review only so it is only a factor in the last 2mins of a half. That's at least what I gathered during my quick scan of the rulebook while watching the game and also chattingComment
-
Re: The Called Back TD
From the Super Bowl XLII play by play
3rd Quarter
4-2-NYG 44 (11:07)(Punt formation) 6-C.Hanson punts 31 yards to NYG 13, Center-66-L.Paxton. 25-R.McQuarters ran ob at NYG 14 for 1 yard. New England challenged the too many players on field ruling, and the play was REVERSED. (Punt formation) PENALTY on NYG-57-C.Blackburn, Illegal Substitution, 5 yards, enforced at NYG 44 - No Play.Comment
-
Re: The Called Back TD
I remember Belichick challenging too many men on the field before, and he was right. After that play the Patriots got 5 yards because the other team did have a guy running off the field when the ball was snapped.Comment
-
Re: The Called Back TD
I think the league should allow the Rams 12 men on the field at all times,when they put 11 out there nothing good happens add that extra guy and just like that a touchdown,maybe Spags can call the league office tommorrow and look into that.Comment
-
Re: The Called Back TD
Lol hey at least you just made one man's day with that commentOriginally posted by dgr828 View PostComment
-
Okay..
I read an artIcle today that said in the Kevin Smith td go-ahead td, there was an illegal lineman 2 yards down the line of scrimmage. What would that have meant for the rams, if that was actually called? Would there have been a 10 second runoff which would have forced the lions to kick a fg?
Looking at the replay it seems the refs did miss it, if its an actual rule. Can someone clear the truth behind this for me? Was the article coming out of left field or completely true. If so what would have been the consequences of the penalty?-09-10-2012, 09:45 PM -
When your the niners, and you are playing the RAMS
The Punt return for a TD was also allowed to happen after holding not being called by the officials.
So far the RAMs are up 12-0, with the zebras ahead with 14.
gap-12-26-2010, 11:34 AM -
For some reason Spags is getting all the blame for this year. He has been a disappointment, but he is not in charge of the worst offense in football. For the most part people on this board and other Rams sites want Spags fired for a proven head coach like Jeff Fisher, which is fine. However, they still want to bring back McDaniels for offensive continuity. In the new NFL, if a team averages barely over 10 points a game they will consistently lose. The Rams offense has a chance to compete with some of the worst offenses in NFL history, but after the decimation of the offensive line, and having to play a third string QB it will be impossible to read into the play of the offense from here on out.
I don't really hear a lot of complaints with McDaniels. Shurmer got booed and heckled out of the building nearly every game for his boring playcalling and dink and dunk offense. The stats comparing the Rams this year and last year are pretty shocking. Broncos fans warned me what he was like. He always tries to be the smartest man in the building. He over complicates things. He tries to do the opposite of what is generally done (run out of shotgun, pass out of heavy sets) to the point where its just as easy to read for a defensive coordinator than someone who follows the textbook. He loves running option routes, long developing patterns, and deep ins and outs. It's hard to imagine an offensive line good enough to give 3-5 seconds of protection consistently. Offensive 'geniuses' generally don't go far from script. Just like Martz, he isn't going to change philosophies from what got him in that position. Its clear he has free rein to gameplan and create plays every week. Spags makes gametime decisions like whether or not to go for it, but doesn't seem to hinder what McDaneils wants to do. There's yet to be a gameplan this year where the other team has to say 'wow we just got outsmarted, or they just got us this week'. Usually its the opposite, like against Seattle playing out of empty shotgun formation half the game, and completely taking away the threat of a run. Plain stupid, even to the fans.
Here are the stats for this year.
...Rank 2011 Home Away 2010 Points per game 32 11.7 14.7 8.7 18.1 Yards per game 31 284 302.9 (26) Yards per point 32 24.3 17.4 36.1 16.8 Points per play 32 0.184 0.228 0.138 0.274 -12-07-2011, 12:16 PM -
The below is a table looking at the Rams scores for each half of the games they played, whether they won or loss the half, and the final result
...Week Opponent First Half Result Second Half Result Final Score Result 1 Minnesota (H) 0 - 13 Loss 6 - 21 Loss 6 - 34 Loss 2 Tampa Bay (A) 10 - 7 Win 9 - 10 Loss 19 - 17 Win 3 Dallas (H) 21 - 10 Win 10 - 24 Loss 31 - 34 Loss 4 Bye Bye Bye Bye 5 Philadelphia (A) 7 - 20 Loss 21 - 14 Win 28 -34 Loss 6 San Francisco (H) 14 - 10 Win 3 - 21 Loss 17 - 31 Loss 7 Seattle (H) 21 - 6 Win 7 - 20 Loss 28 - 26 Win 8 Kansas City (A) 7 - 10 Loss 0 - 24 Loss 7 -34 Loss 9 San Francisco (A) 10 - 10 Tie 3 - 0 Win 13 -10 Win 10 Arizona (A) 14 - 10 Win 0 - 21 Loss 14 - 31 Loss 11 Denver (H) 13 - 7 Win 9 - 0 Win 22 - 7 Win 12 San Diego (A) 10 - 6 Win 14 - 21 Loss 24 - 27 Loss -12-29-2014, 09:19 AM -
From the Rams official site:
It looks like a go this Sunday for Cooper, Spruce, and Gaines. who all practiced with no limitations. Hopefully, they can shake off the rust and contribute.Austin, Tavon WR Shoulder LP - - - Cooper, Pharoh WR Shoulder FP - - - Easley, Dominique DT Illness DNP - - - Gaines, E.J. CB Thigh FP - - - Hayes, William DE Ankle DNP - - - Joyner, Lamarcus DB Toe DNP - - - Spruce, Nelson WR Knee FP
Austin has a shoulder injury, but was able to practice (limited), so it's probably nothing serious. It'll be interesting to see how he does if he suits up on Sunday, and if he has a target on that shoulder.
Hayes and Joyner did not practice, but I'm hoping it's just a matter of letting them heal, and not aggravating the injuries. The defense is really going to need both those guys.-09-29-2016, 09:17 AM
Comment