Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

identity?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • #1

    identity?

    Where was the identity for
    the rams? I did not see any identity on the O side of the ball. We lost
    28 to 0! yes. So why did we not show that we are a running, stop the run
    team? Win or loose we would have showed identity by atleast running the ball.
    Last edited by HUbison; -09-14-2009, 01:40 PM.
    Tags: None
  • #2
    Re: identity?

    When the Rams ran the ball, often times it was for minimal gain. The offensive line was not getting much push up front. Jackson had only five runs on the day that went for more than three yards, and one of them was called back because Avery was holding. It also didn't help that miscues and penalties put this team in situations where they needed to pass to gain back yards lost by negative plays.

    I would have liked to see some more attempts to get Jackson involved in this offense. It seemed like only a handful of his touches actually amounted to anything. Everyone on this staff has talked about his importance to the offense; you've got to find ways of getting him the ball in situations where he can make an impact.

    Comment

    Previous template Next

    Related Topics

    Collapse
    • RamWraith
      Rams Want Run Game Revival
      by RamWraith
      Thursday, November 17, 2005

      By Nick Wagoner
      Senior Writer

      When the Rams’ season appeared to be in the most dire of straits – playing two games without the use of quarterback Marc Bulger and receivers Torry Holt and Isaac Bruce – they hopped on the only mode of transportation that could carry them to victory.

      Running back Steven Jackson, nicknamed ‘Train’ because of his size and speed, responded by carrying the load against New Orleans and Jacksonville. Even without those Pro Bowl offensive talents, St. Louis found a way to victory on the strength of Jackson’s running, solid offensive line performances and a few timely turnovers on defense.

      After a bye week allowed the aforementioned offensive stars to recover from their injuries, the Rams’ biggest task offensively appeared to be finding the right balance between run and pass. After all, everyone who had longed for a power running game finally got to see what they wanted and it was effective.

      Even with the whole world knowing that Jackson was the Rams’ biggest offensive threat, opponents still couldn’t find a way to stop him. So, it stood to reason that the Rams would stick with Jackson against Seattle last week in another extremely important game. But the running game wasn’t as big a part of the game as many of the players expected.

      “Yeah, (I was) a little bit (surprised) because that kind of was our plan going in to run the ball a little bit more and we had some success but we had a few tackles for losses and that makes it tough on the play calling when you don’t get positive yardage on the running game too,” right guard Adam Timmerman said. “It takes commitment to stick with it and hopefully that’s what it will take down the stretch.”

      After the Jackson got 20 carries in the win against the Saints and 25 against Jacksonville the following week, his total dropped back to 17 against the Seahawks. Entering that game, the Seahawks were 12th in the league against the run, but were also without starting defensive tackle Marcus Tubbs and linebacker Jamie Sharper.

      In addition to the missing defensive pieces, the weather forecast called for rain, meaning that there was a good chance the game would be won on the ground.

      While Timmerman and Bruce expressed surprise at the lack of running game, Jackson actually wasn’t surprised by the slightly lighter load.

      “I kind of expected it,” Jackson said. “We had to get guys back into the groove of things and we wanted to try to stretch them out. We were going against the No. 1 offense and we knew we had to put up points so you can’t expect to run the ball too much.”

      Jackson finished with 17 carries for 70 yards, an average of just over 4 yards a carry. On the surface that would seem to be a more than solid performance, but a part of the reason Jackson’s carries were lessened were the direct of result...
      -11-18-2005, 05:05 AM
    • coy bacon
      The Running Plays Myth
      by coy bacon
      Building upon Mr. Balzer's comments found in the thread entitled: "Balzer comments from Sirius Radio"

      I believe that for many years, experts, analysts, and gits, have said that if Running Back (RB) so and so gets XX amount of carries per game, then that team wins YY% of the time, with YY usually being about 80. The implication, or outright conclusion, behind this is that in order for the team to win, their RB must carry the ball so many times.

      Aristotle weeps.

      I've always felt a bit troubled by such statements, as if its an ace magic formulae for winning football games. Codswallop! Not bloody likely I say! It's another example of easy to swallow inferior analysis.

      Some things Balzer said that are dead on:

      "As I've noted before, if you're getting stuffed for losses on first down, it's tough to keep running."

      and

      "These are typical stats that don't look at the big picture. Why did Jackson get the ball so much in the fourth quarter? Because the Rams had the lead."

      and

      "In most of the games the Rams lost, they fell behind, and often by a lot, which meant they weren't going to run the ball. In those games, Jackson was often stuffed consistently and that led to more passing. When he would get minus 2 yards on first down, passes followed. When he was stopped on 3rd and 1, that turned the ball over to the defense, which kept the chains from moving and fewer offensive plays."


      The point should be obvious: a running game that is ineffective against a particular team should not be used indefinately, especially when they're behind. Isn't it possible that teams with exquisite passing games gain early leads and then run the ball to eat up the clock? But, the dim only look at the stats, and see that the team won, and did a lot of running... therefore run the ball to win is the key!

      Bollocks I say to the formulae of amt. of runs per game equates to wins. Its an uncorrelated relationship.

      If you want to win football games, do what you need to do, to score the most points (duh). That includes runs, or passes, or both, that work. If a D is stacking the line with 8 men 75% of the time the coach better be calling passes.
      -06-15-2006, 07:59 AM
    • Guam rammer
      Run blocking
      by Guam rammer
      I know the ****** have a pretty stout run defense but what i saw today was no push at all. Poor Steven Jackson couldnt build any steam with all those defenders in the backfield. His linemen slowed him down on some plays and it just seemed like Jax couldnt find any daylight anywhere. Our running plays look pretty basic and predictable so why do we continue to call the same plays over again. It seems like this is our main reason why we cannot sustain drives. We come into second halves of games up by a couple of scores then we try to run. Blaaah!!! An all pro running back just can't get it done without the big fellas opening up the holes. If we can't get it for almost an entire season, then the playcalling or the o-line needs to change.
      -12-26-2010, 04:42 PM
    • Nick
      Jackson boxed in
      by Nick
      Jackson Boxed In
      Sunday, November 20, 2005

      By Nick Wagoner
      Senior Writer

      Rarely in the past six years of Rams football has a team had the audacity to load up against the run and dare the team known for the “Greatest Show on Turf” to beat it with the pass.

      But that’s exactly what the Arizona Cardinals did to the Rams on Sunday at the Edward Jones Dome. More shocking, though, than Arizona’s dare of the Rams was the fact that the ploy actually worked.

      “With an eight man front and they bring 24 (safety Adrian Wilson) down in the paint, we started off early in the game trying to get the ball down the field to get them more in the Cover 2 shell,” coach Joe Vitt said. "We tried to run the football, but we couldn’t run the football. Give them credit, they stopped us.”

      Stop might be the polite term for what Arizona was able to do to the Rams’ ground game Sunday. Running back Steven Jackson accounted for all of the team’s carries and, obviously, all of its yards.

      That might not be a bad thing on a day where he was breaking off runs all over the place, but his longest gain of the day was 6 yards. Coincidentally, that was also his total yardage for the day.

      Jackson finished with 6 yards on 12 carries, an average of half a yard per attempt. Jackson had a 6-yard gain in the second quarter which was his longest of the day. Of his 12 carries, five went for negative yards.

      Jackson made matters worse with a fumble near the end of the first half. All in all, it was a long day for Jackson and it didn’t help that the Rams were unable to get the Cardinals to come out of their loaded package through the air.

      “That was something that is frustrating as well,” receiver Torry Holt said. “In order for us to win games we have to run the ball as well as pass the ball. Once they make you one dimensional the ball is in their court now. They know what to expect from us and they can set defenses accordingly. For us to take a big step back in the running game today is disheartening.”

      That step back started in motion last week against Seattle. With quarterback Marc Bulger, Holt and Isaac Bruce out for the two games before the bye, Jackson got his engine going by posting consecutive big games, including a career day against the Jaguars when he ran for 179 yards on 25 carries.

      But the regression of the running game evolved beginning last week when he had 70 yards on 17 carries and it hit its crescendo this week with Arizona loaded up to stop it.

      Much of that blame, according to center Andy McCollum falls squarely on the shoulders of the offensive line.

      “We weren’t getting the job done,” McCollum said. “We weren’t getting much yardage on the run. We were negative yardage on the first few runs. They had some good defenses dialed up and we didn’t get the answers. They just...
      -11-21-2005, 05:37 PM
    • RamDez
      He leads NFL ball carriers in total yards
      by RamDez
      BY STEVE KORTE
      News-Democrat
      ST. LOUIS - Steven Jackson is proving that he can be an all-purpose running back.
      Jackson leads NFL running backs in yards from scrimmage this season with 531 -- 367 rushing yards and 164 receiving yards -- this season. San Francisco's Frank Gore is second with 460 yards.
      "It's all the same," Jackson said of being both a receiver and a runner. "Once you get the ball you're a running back anyway, so it doesn't matter."
      Jackson jokingly referred to himself as a "Big Marshall Faulk" -- arguably the best all-purpose back in NFL history -- after gaining 146 yards from scrimmage in the St. Louis Rams' 41-34 win over the Detroit Lions on Sunday.
      "Coach (Scott Linehan) has opened the offense a little bit because after those first few weeks when the running game was so successful, we have faced a lot of eight-man boxes that are geared to stop the run," Jackson said. "The defense was trying to take that element away from us, so he wanted to get me involved in other ways and still contribute to the game and push the ball downfield. If we can't get it in the running game, we'll get some short passes."
      Jackson is on pace for 60 receptions for 656 yards after having only 43 receptions for 320 yards last season.
      "I've always had these talents," Jackson said of receiving skills. "They just didn't pop up overnight. It's just the fact that I'm able to put up stats now. That's what we all look at, I guess."
      To Linehan, it's all about getting the ball in Jackson's hands. Jackson is averaging 26 touches per game this season.
      "Certainly he's our main ballcarrier, and to be able to get him involved some in the passing game gives the ability to use him in two ways, as opposed to just handing him the ball," Linehan said. "He does a lot with it once he's got it in his hands, too. I think that the sensible thing is to figure out more ways to get it in his hands."
      Jackson said the Rams' entire offensive unit seems to be finally feeling comfortable with Linehan's system.
      "That's how offense goes," Jackson said. "Defense goes faster than offense, and we need to all get on one accord. So much goes into an offense. The timing of the receivers and the quarterbacks, the pass protection, making sure the running backs and the offensive line are on (the same page). It's so much that goes into it, but once it clicks, it clicks."
      Jackson got his first rushing touchdown last Sunday as he ran into the end zone untouched from 1 yard out.
      "To get our first rushing touchdown makes it feels like, now we've done it," Jackson said. "When you can't do it sometimes, you start to overemphasize on it. Once we got in there, we got settled in and we know that we're firing on all cylinders now."
      Rams quarterback Marc Bulger said Jackson's touchdown run was...
      -10-07-2006, 03:33 PM
    Working...
    X