Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What are the new rules of the NFL?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • What are the new rules of the NFL?

    During the rams game, they blocked the field goal and returned it for a touchdown. I never knew, even if you don't call a penalty, you can go back and view if there were 12 men on the field. Im not sure if im a noob, or what. But set me straight on this one if i am wrong.

    But i have never seen that S***. I couldn't believe they went back and made a penalty when they did not even call one. I didn't think you could change a call, help me if im wrong. I might be and im not sure if the rams had 12 men on the field. I say we got robbed. Cause if Seattle wasn't getting called for off sides all day long i counted 4 times offsides, only once called. why not give us that touchdown? your thoughts?

    other than that the new rules in the NFL are tough to keep up with. Can some let me know what the knew one's are?
    Last edited by hawaiianpunch; -09-14-2009, 08:13 PM.

  • #2
    Re: What are the new rules of the NFL?

    It was legit. Thats pretty much the only penalty you can review. Belicheat did it in the Super Bowl vs the Giants when they caught that dude trying to run off, and the Bears just did it last night vs the pack. Not sure why its reviewable, but really the thing is we had too many on the field, if we only had eleven its likely we wouldn't have even blocked the field goal. Sucks but thats how it goes, the Squawks didn't get any special treatment on that play- for a change.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: What are the new rules of the NFL?

      Originally posted by C-Mob 71 View Post
      Not sure why its reviewable
      Probably because it's one of the few penalties that is clear black-or-white in terms of seeing if it was committed or not. It doesn't require any interpretation or judgment on the official's part. There either are or there aren't 12 men on the field.

      The easiest way for the Rams to have avoided this situation is by not having 12 men on the field to begin with.

      Comment

      Related Topics

      Collapse

      • jdpbmo
        reviewing calls from the booth
        by jdpbmo
        Okay, enough is enough. I can usually sit by and hold my piece, but I am so tired of this idiotic process the NFL uses to review calls. It isn't that I'm against the reviewing of questionable calls. I am 100 % for it. I want the call to be right. A noncall or wrong call shouldn't cost a team the game. It all came to a head in the Detroit/GB game when they didn't bother reviewing the touchdown late in the game. How crazy was that? If I was in charge of that part of the game, there would be some people looking for work tomorrow. My main problem with the process is that you are asking officials that make a call, or maybe don't make a call, to reverse their own decision. You are asking them to second-guess themselves or perhaps members of their crew. Now we can sit there and say "well, so what if they have to reverse a call to get it right". Hey, news flash, these officials have egos. They don't want to come out and say "sorry everyone, we just blew that last call". So they look at the replay to satisfy us, then come back and say "indisputable evidence to reverse the call on the field". That's a load of crap. There have been plenty of calls that they show that need to be reversed, but until you get a seperate crew of 2 or 3 people in the booth who do nothing but review a call when it's challenged, you will continue to see this craziness happen. Why wouldn't you have people not associated with the officiating crew reveiwing these calls? If you did, you would find a number of calls overturned when it's obvious they are wrong. You would find calls that are legitimate standing as good calls. People would be satisfied for the most part. Except for the Z E B R A S. They will find they are making a call or two incorrectly in important situations. But you know what else you are doing? You are taking some responsibility from them. What does everyone think? jd
        -11-25-2001, 07:37 PM
      • 28rulz
        Confused....Help!
        by 28rulz
        I have only been REALLY watching football for 3yrs., so I don'y understand all the rules yet. I need someone to tell me why there were no penalties or anything even said about Marshall Faulks helmet being pulled off. The play was still in motion , it was clear to see, and guys were still piling on. I know we got the touchdown , but shouldnt there have been something?
        -01-29-2002, 03:03 PM
      • djccon
        No Whining!
        by djccon
        I haven't had the heart to read a whole lot about what others are saying about yesterday's game, but I'm tired of "the official's call." from what little I've heard. For ny to even SUGGEST Garnes didn't grab Canidate just dumbfounds me. How far did his jersey need to be stretched for them to feel the call was justified? Add to that, the possession on which they got their 3rd field goal - on which one of the ny DBs was hammering on Holt's arms WITHOUT LOOKING BACK FOR THE BALL. Where the he** was THAT call? There are FOUR more points on the board for us.

        I suggest ny should be THRILLED what the refs DIDN'T do to them. What about the repeated headlocks placed on Wistrom and Little that were NEVER called? The tackle where the guy grabbed Holt's helmet to pull him down - ummmmm, sorry folks, but you cannot use ANY part of a ball carrier's helmet in an attempt to tackle the runner - remember Fletcher getting that called against him (using the back of Deuce Staley's helmet to pull him down) in Philly?

        Props to the Giants and the scheme they put in place to throttle the Rams down. Don't cheapen by whining about it being taken away from you. You had as much given to you as you had taken away.

        As for us Rams fans, we all know we escaped by skin of our teeth. However, when you play a very GOOD team, play without your A game, and still win...well, that takes a GREAT team.
        -10-15-2001, 05:45 PM
      • NJ Ramsfan1
        Replay and other random thoughts
        by NJ Ramsfan1
        I am convinced more than ever that replay is ruining football. It is absolutely torturous to watch what seems like every sideline catch and scoring play reviewed. It disrupts the flow of the game. It allows you to view a game, get excited over a score or a play, then rips the rug out from underneath you while making you wait for the outcome. It's no better in baseball. Though I understand it's not going away, I absolutely hate it.

        Tennis and basketball have it right. The calls are used very sparingly and result in an immediate decision. Little to no waiting. No viewing from 5 different angles. No indecision on something we can clearly see from our own living rooms.

        And don't tell me that "getting it right is the most important thing". Sometimes REPLAY doesn't even result in a right decision!! You mean to tell me Garcon's sideline catch (a call which was overturned and ruled a catch) was legit? His momentum was clearly taking him a foot out of bounds in the act of the catch. You can't convince me otherwise.The human element is a part of sports. Players make mistakes. Coaches make mistakes. Officials make mistakes. Live with it. Be more competent. Add an official if need be. You mean to tell me in all the games played in the years before replay that there were THAT MANY plays that weren't called correctly?? I don't buy it.

        Also stuck in my craw was the roughing the passer call vs. Aaron Donald. This is exhibit "A" of what's ruining the game. Guy hits the QB in the act of throwing, executes a perfect form tackle, doesn't lead with the head and still gets flagged 15 yards simply because Hoyer took a hard hit. Can't tell you how infuriated I was watching that. Concern for safety (hypocritical given the NFL's long time denial of concussion effects and allowing Thursday night football) has completely neutered good defensive play.

        It's getting tougher and tougher to enjoy sports. And replay shows that change isn't always for the better....
        -09-22-2017, 05:06 AM
      • RamsFanSam
        Yo, Zebras!
        by RamsFanSam
        Hey, guys, I will tell you this: I'm all for hiring the disabled. In fact, I used to have a guy working for me that had 20/200 vision. He was a really good employee.

        But, seriously, you guys need to have a mandatory visual and psychological test for the boys in the stripes. I've noticed that during the 4 Rams games this season, you have either missed a penalty or called one that had to be invented by Hollywood. What is wrong with your eyes?

        Don't get me wrong here. I can think of at least 4 penalties committed by the Rams that you did not call. But, I can also name at least 4 that were committed against the Rams that weren't called. Eight penalties that some blind as a bat official missed.

        I thought SB XXXVI was over. I thought you guys were committed to calling the games fairly.

        In your defense, I don't think the penalties that were not called changed the results of the games.

        Now, let's discuss the 'frivolous' calls. Do you guys have to submit to mandatory drug testing? If not, you should. What part of your ass do you guys pull these penalties out of? Seriously, you guys need to understand something. We have instant replay.

        Listen again: Instant Replay.

        It's time for you Zebras to learn one thing: Every time you make a stupid call, America sees it. I'm sure you guys are using your credentials you earned after officiating the 2004 elections to keep your NFL jobs. However, this IS the NFL. Close is NOT close enough. If you aren't sure, demand a replay on the monitor BEFORE you make a call! I don't care if it isn't allowed. All I care about is fair play. I can stand my team losing a ame if every penalty was called fairly. I can't stand a win when some power hungry Zebra can't see straight.

        I'm sure the Clan agrees on this. We ALL want to win, but we want a FAIR win, not one tainted by some bad calls.

        I'm sure you all know the rulebook, but can't we make it an official rule that it can't be printed in Braille for the officials?

        OK, MY RANT IS over!
        -10-01-2006, 06:20 PM
      Working...
      X