Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lack of skill, or silly mistakes?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • #1

    Lack of skill, or silly mistakes?

    Hey clanram,

    I have been thinking about this topic for a while. I have come to the conclusion that the reason for our misfortune is that we lack player skill WAY more than making stupid mistakes. Outside of Oj Atogwe and Steven Jackson, I wouldn't say we have anyone that we could say is "great". Donnie Avery will definatly develop into a great reviever, but he needs time of course. Bulger is only as good as his O-line, and they aren't all that great. I thnmk we have tons of potential in players like Jaason Smith, Avery, Wade, Laurinitaus, and Long. What do you guys think.

    P.S. : I am a Bulger fan boy so I think if that line stays healthy and pulls it together, he could maybe have a breakout year like hid did 3 or four years ago. LETS GO ST. LOUIS!
    Tags: None
  • #2
    Re: Lack of skill, or silly mistakes?

    Both

    New coach, new scheme, lot's of young folks on the roster and starting at that. It will take time. I didn't care for the 28-0 loss in week one either but I've been a fan for more than 25 years and have seen more downs than up.

    WE ARE IN A REBUILDING MODE !!!!!

    When we really start winning again there will be starters on the roster that are now freshman and juniors in College !!!!

    I'm here for the LONG HALL !!

    Maineram -

    Comment

    • #3
      Re: Lack of skill, or silly mistakes?

      Close to no skill. Its going to take a couple of years to weed out the years
      of bad drafting and free agent pick ups. :|

      Comment

      • #4
        Re: Lack of skill, or silly mistakes?

        A very young team, 3rd youngest in the NFL if i'm not mistaken, so it WILL take some time.

        Comment

        • #5
          Re: Lack of skill, or silly mistakes?

          Well we don't have a lot of skill so unless we play near-perfect football we lose. I guess the "mistakes" cost us in the game in the sense that if we played perfectly we'd probably win. But no team plays perfectly - Seattle turned the ball over 3 times and still trounced us - it's just that the more skilled teams overcome their mistakes a bit easier.

          Comment

          • #6
            Re: Lack of skill, or silly mistakes?

            What I saw Sunday was a coach that want's to instill aggression, but it was used too loosly (IE personal fouls). Get rid of "Cogs" as this guy will forever cancer your o-line. Take your lumps for the 1st 5 or so games then they will learn to work as a team and things will look way, way up. In the mean time hope teams overlook the rams. Love James L for the record!

            Comment

            Previous template Next

            Related Topics

            Collapse
            • RamsInfiniti
              And when the smoke finally settles ....
              by RamsInfiniti
              What are we going to see from this Ram's team?

              I guess this is a pre-camp prognosis of some sort. I typically try to look at the season each year, and I usually come up with a semi-inflated, overhyped outlook of the Rams. This is simply because I love the Rams. You always make things you love out to be better than they actually are ...

              Well, with this new, and improved, version of the Rams, I don't feel like I can make an accurate assessment. Honestly, I think this team can end up with anywhere from 4 to 10 wins. And there are a variety of reasons I believe this ...

              First, I've indicated time and time again that I am a firm supported of the theory that there is not much gap in talent from team to team across the NFL. When we talk about talent, we talk about the physical and mental ability of players to be successful and make plays. Just because a player has talent does not mean he will be successful in the NFL, it simply means he has a shot. There is a reason there is an NFL combine each year. It is to see which players can physically, and to some extent mentally, cut it in the NFL. From team to team, across the board, the talent is pretty similar ...

              What distinguishes how the talent translates on the field? Well, in the short term you have to look at experience, morale, the "system", the coaches. In the long term, you have to look at how well such players adapt to change, how versatile they are, whether they can stay healthy, whether they are content with where they are, who they are, and who they might be ...

              So what are the major problems with the Rams of 2009? Simply lack of inexperience from my point of view, at least at most positions. Lack of morale at others ...

              Look at what we have. A new upbeat coaching staff with a vision of a modern WCO and physical defense. A QB that is smart and accurate, a protypical freak of a RB, quick, agile fresh WR's, an established TE, a strong young offensive and defensive line, hungry young linebackers, world class speed and nice size in the secondary ...

              So what's the problem? A QB lacking morale after the beating he has taken, injuries to that chisled freak of a running back, questionable depth behind him, WR's with little or no experience, no proven depth at TE, an offensive line that will be learning one another, undersized defensive line that will have to learn to be creative to take advantage of opportunities, only one proven linebacker, and defensives back that have tons of talent but all seem to be missing "it" with the exception of Bartell and Atogwe (wait to see on Butler) ...

              So, what does this mean? The talent is there, no doubt in my mind. So what does this coaching staff have to do? It's three-fold in my opinion ...

              1. Make the players forget - Make them forget they are losers, start them off on a level playing field. Get them...
              -07-29-2009, 11:35 AM
            • Nick_Weasel
              Five Rams players on the spot
              by Nick_Weasel
              I'll agree with Bulger and Carriker, but Long, Avery, and Smith? Smith hasn't even played a regular season game yet and he already has to "turn it up a notch" ... huh? And really, how does Avery need to turn it up a notch?...
              -09-03-2009, 05:14 PM
            • rammiser
              WR wishful thinking
              by rammiser
              I would love to see us pull the trigger on a trade for Braylon Edwards. As long as they don't demand a first round pick I think it would be worth it. Edwards and Avery in the starting lineup would be great. I know the salary cap comes into play but if we stand pat with our current wr's, teams will definately be keying on Jackson. We need an impact wr and I'm not sold that Avery is a 1. I like Avery as a 2 but don't think he will cut it as a 1. I know the guy had a lot of drops last year but most people say it was because of his focus and the team losing. We bring in a guy like that now for say a 2nd and a 4th or a 5th it's going to improve this team greatly. Plus it wouldnt hurt having a weopon for Bulger to be able to depend on. I like Avery and Burton a lot just dont think either of them are a #1 wr.
              -05-02-2009, 09:44 AM
            • Lange
              Whats positive about this team thoughts
              by Lange
              Hey guys,

              I just being new here wanted to point out what I love about this team so far, even though its early in the season I just wanted to point some stuff out to be happy about and to show we have great potential as a team with what we have.

              First I want to say I love our offense. Donnie Avery is a really good reciever who will only keep getting better with more experience and has a lot of potential. He's fast reliable and a play maker and im really happy to see him emerge as the #1 now Holt is gone. He has big shoes to fill with Holts absence but im sure in the coming time he will settle in.

              Also Laurent Robinson looks promising, as a starter young, and showed flashes of promise in the past but now the old time greats and other receivers are gone in Dane Looker and Bennett he gets his chance. He seems to have good talent and should be good at #2 in this offense.

              Thirdly Steven Jackson is a beast enough said lol. He can have really great games at times and definetely is a franchise back. It would help him to have a better quality offensive line for opening gaps but our line is rebuilding and im hoping it can become somewhat more consistent. At any rate I have faith it can.

              I like Marc Bulger a lot. He's been a great QB in previous years and done a lot for this team and up untill the last few years been a franchise QB by definition. Then 07 and 08 went completely downhill and to be honest since I never have gotten the chance to see many rams games because of my local broadcasting outside of the information gathering i've done im not sure what the problems are. O-line i've heard was a blame and probably a huge one but also he just needs to step it up. He's lucky to still be a starter most QB's after 2 terrible seasons would be off a NFL team. Fortunatley he is able to still be here as our QB and I support him. He can still make good decisions and throws and maybe better protection and a solid recieving corps can finally let him do that this year. Go Marc.

              Now ill go to defense, which I honestly don't have to say a ton about but I like what im seeing. It sucks we lost draft but Vobora is a promising kid who seems to be able to learn and fill the role. A lot of young guys on D who can develop and get it done. Will Witherspoon is a veteran on that LB corps to help the young guys and a good LBer. Safetys corners all look promising for the future. Our D can only get better.

              That all said im looking forward to a fun entertaining and promising season. We may not be a playoff caliber team but im sure we can get our share of wins where it counts. We have to we have the potential by far for it and it would be sad to see all of the potential get wasted. We can beat good teams and im sure we can only hope our coaching staff and players get it together and get the job done. Don't worry about 2007 and 2008 that is behind us this team is steering...
              -09-18-2009, 11:10 PM
            • rNemesis
              HOW CLOSE IS THIS TEAM TO COMPETING?(VERY LONG)Please provide feedback
              by rNemesis
              First of all let me just say that these last few years have been VERY frustrating and embarassing for me as a RAM FAN and I'm sure you guys are just as disappointed. I have watched my team go from the greatest show on turf to, as a washington post columnist said after the redskins loss, " the most miserable mass on grass". MY main question here is , " How far are the rams from being a decent competitive rock solid team? Its a long way to go; it doesnt happen overnight but it shouldnt take FOREVER either.


              But I am not gonna sit here and talk about that all night. We know what has happened. We know what we've become. 13 straight losses dating back to last season. 3-13 in 2007 and 2-14 in 2008. 5 wins in the last 30 or so games? ( not sure exactly the stats) That is horrible.

              Let's go back year by year as to how we finished record wise.
              In the 1990's we were bad. But so were other teams which are now good today. But if you look at our 90's record to others, you will see that we were bad most of those years. Other teams had bad years too during the 90's but it was only really the lions, bengals, cardinals and saints. That should show you how bad of a team the Rams are. We never finished over 7 wins from 1990 up until 1999, which was our superbowl year. Which now tells me that the Rams have been bad, are now bad, and I hope we dont continue to be bad. But lately one has to believe that that is the penalty for our actions.

              2000- 10-6 DECENT
              2001- 14-2 ( excellent; we beat the pats that season but lost in the SB to the same :|)
              2002- 7-9 Not bad
              2003- 12-4 excellent
              2004- 8-8 not bad; competitive
              2005- I think we were 7-9 or 6-10 cant remember
              2006- 8-8
              2007- 3-13 horrible
              2008- 2-14 lousy

              I am not surprised at how we have fallen so badly. What I cant seem to understand is how fast we have fallen as such. How come we havent been able to stop the bleeding and bounce back like other teams have seemed to?

              So tell me guys. How far off is this team from competing? Well, I look at the league and I have noticed that most of the other teams have playmakers in a lot of key positions. Why is that? Because they do a great job of DRAFTING PLAYERS THAT FIT INTO THEIR SCHEME WELL. We on the other hand have not done that lately. We have drafted players that have done well IN THEIR SCHEME and so it didnt matter to the previous regime ( Jay ZYgmunt ) if they fit or not the point was they wanted them so much that they drafted them regardless of their college scheme and success. In the era since Martz left, we have drafted the likes of busts ( or so they appear to be) like Tye Hill, Adam Carriker, Claude Wroten, Fakhir Brown, etc. The list goes on and on.

              THIS HAS REALLY HURT THIS ORGANIZATION SO MUCH THAT IT IS REARING ITS UGLY HEAD NOW. Bad drafting has put us in such a talentless hole that...
              -09-29-2009, 07:43 PM
            Working...
            X