No announcement yet.


  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts


    First of all let me just say that these last few years have been VERY frustrating and embarassing for me as a RAM FAN and I'm sure you guys are just as disappointed. I have watched my team go from the greatest show on turf to, as a washington post columnist said after the redskins loss, " the most miserable mass on grass". MY main question here is , " How far are the rams from being a decent competitive rock solid team? Its a long way to go; it doesnt happen overnight but it shouldnt take FOREVER either.

    But I am not gonna sit here and talk about that all night. We know what has happened. We know what we've become. 13 straight losses dating back to last season. 3-13 in 2007 and 2-14 in 2008. 5 wins in the last 30 or so games? ( not sure exactly the stats) That is horrible.

    Let's go back year by year as to how we finished record wise.
    In the 1990's we were bad. But so were other teams which are now good today. But if you look at our 90's record to others, you will see that we were bad most of those years. Other teams had bad years too during the 90's but it was only really the lions, bengals, cardinals and saints. That should show you how bad of a team the Rams are. We never finished over 7 wins from 1990 up until 1999, which was our superbowl year. Which now tells me that the Rams have been bad, are now bad, and I hope we dont continue to be bad. But lately one has to believe that that is the penalty for our actions.

    2000- 10-6 DECENT
    2001- 14-2 ( excellent; we beat the pats that season but lost in the SB to the same :|)
    2002- 7-9 Not bad
    2003- 12-4 excellent
    2004- 8-8 not bad; competitive
    2005- I think we were 7-9 or 6-10 cant remember
    2006- 8-8
    2007- 3-13 horrible
    2008- 2-14 lousy

    I am not surprised at how we have fallen so badly. What I cant seem to understand is how fast we have fallen as such. How come we havent been able to stop the bleeding and bounce back like other teams have seemed to?

    So tell me guys. How far off is this team from competing? Well, I look at the league and I have noticed that most of the other teams have playmakers in a lot of key positions. Why is that? Because they do a great job of DRAFTING PLAYERS THAT FIT INTO THEIR SCHEME WELL. We on the other hand have not done that lately. We have drafted players that have done well IN THEIR SCHEME and so it didnt matter to the previous regime ( Jay ZYgmunt ) if they fit or not the point was they wanted them so much that they drafted them regardless of their college scheme and success. In the era since Martz left, we have drafted the likes of busts ( or so they appear to be) like Tye Hill, Adam Carriker, Claude Wroten, Fakhir Brown, etc. The list goes on and on.

    THIS HAS REALLY HURT THIS ORGANIZATION SO MUCH THAT IT IS REARING ITS UGLY HEAD NOW. Bad drafting has put us in such a talentless hole that it could take years to uproot this mess. THIS IS A CRISIS RIGHT NOW. And the thing about that that scares me is, by that time, all of the other draft picks on the other teams would be veterans at that point. This thing could get real ugly or real better in time, depending on what the current regime ( spags devaney etc.) does. And so far, they have shown that they are competent, sensible football minded people who know talent when they see it and are no-nonsense. So I am confident ( although not sold) that, because of their respective resume's, that they will do well and get the right players in here to turn this thing around.

    Now lets talk about positions of impact or positions of need and how we drafted recently to accommodate those needs. around 2006 or 2007 I think CB was one of our biggest needs, so our first round pick was Tye hill. About the biggest underachiever at the position that I have seen. So that was a waste. Then we needed to get pressure on the QB so we drafted Chris Long. All this guy has done since he was here was rack up tackles....downfield mostly, but with all out heart and motor. BUT WHERES THE SACKS? People are wondering if this guy was only being hyped up because of Howie Long, his dad who was a great athlete on defense in his day, or if he is a work in progress to someday become one of the best pure 4-3 sack artists in the game. Well he needs to step up because this is what I am very frustrated about right now. We have had terrible drafting from day one and so we went with the safe pick in Chris Long and I would be doomed to eternal hell to know that that should not have been our best pick. People were also saying that year about how we should have got Glenn Dorsey or Vernon Gholston, who both appear to be busts. I wonder how those people feel now; they must feel ashamed. Also Matt Ryan and Joe Flacco were there, but honestly now lets be real. If we got Ryan, then we would have had no one to protect him and hold him upright ( except for Pace, who is no longer with the team). But yet still, the Falcons picked him up and now he is a STAR. THAT FRUSTRATES THE HELL OUT OF ME!!!! WHY CANT WE SEEM TO DRAFT THE RIGHT PLAYERS??!! I AM TIRED OF THIS MAN!!! We also got Avery, who had a stellar roookie year but is now struggling. A puzzling one to say the least but all I can say is that receivers like Desean Jackson were there.

    At the end of 2008 it was decided ( and quite obvious) that we had no pass protection. So we drafted a left tackle ( who is now playing right tackle because of the messed up O line situation) and rightfuly so because we didnt want to mess up Sanchez's rep under center. It would have gotten him killed. But yet the critics say" why didnt the RAmS draft Mark Sanchez"?. I often even wonder if The Dolphins picked up Jake Long because they knew Chris Long wouldnt help them, plus he was a hell of a tackle coming out of college. WHY CANT WE GET A HELL OF A TACKLE COMING OUT OF COLLEGE ( OR ANY POSITION FOR THAT MATTER) What people dont realize is that Mark has a hell of an O-line in front of him ( mangold, woody, faneca, etc.) pro bowl caliber linemen. So of course he would have all day to throw. so now HE looks good and HE's straight for now. THAT FRUSTRATES ME. IT JUST FRUSTRATES ME THAT WE CANT DRAFT THE TYPE OF PLAYERS NEEDED TO MAKE THE TEAM SUCCESSFUL BECAUSE OF OUR INEPTITUDE!!!!!! And to be honest, I am not even a huge fan of Jason smith yet because he is playing out of position so I dont even see his so called " huge" upside. He better learn this game quickly or else I wont be the only one who is frustrated. But andre smith is doing well for the bengals, michael oher is doing well for the ravens , why cant jason smith do well for us? I like the promise of Bradley Fletcher and WE ALL LOVE James Laurinitis, but what about the other draft picks ? ARE they going to be draft busts too? ( scott, null, ogbonnaya, brooks foster)

    Lets talk about what it takes for a team to be a good team. What does it take? lets break it down ( this is my opinion)

    QB- This needs to be a franchise QB who can adjust to defenses on the fly, make smart, accurate throws, and scramble around and make things happen when things dont go right. Or it can be someone who is just efficient and just manages the game ( playing not to lose the game for their team) BUT I WOULD GO WITH A GUY LIKE PEYTON MANNING OR MATT RYAN.

    WR- You need at least one deep threat ( plaxico, TO, steve smith, andre johnson. ochocinco, etc.) and one or two good posession receivers ( toomer, houshmanzadeh, welker, etc. ) to keep moving the chains.

    O line - from center to guards to tackles. The center has to be the staple of the line and anchor things. I think we have found that in Jason Brown. Guards have to get good push in the run game and protect the QB. Tackles ( especially LT) have to protect the QB's blindside and right edge from the bull rush associated with the games best pass rushers.

    TE- has to be able to block in the pass and run game and be a good receiver when you need a play here and there( Dallas Clark, Owen Daniels, Heath Miller, Antonio Gates , etc. )

    RB- Nowadays you need at least two ( three is super ideal like what the Giants did with jacobs, bradshaw, and ward) backs to eat up the defense. A good power back who can bruise through the tackles or bounce it outside, and a change of pace speed back who can relieve the first back JUST AS EFFECTIVELY. move the chains. But if you only have one its not too too bad its just that you better hope he dont get injured.

    FB- has become obsolete but is still being used. Not much to say here, this is not a need.


    DT- you need a run stuffing, pass threatening bull rushing nose tackle who can clog up the middle on runs and push the pocket on pass plays.

    DE- you need guys who can rush the passer. Plain and simple. and rush with authority.

    LB- you need guys who can support the run and not get fooled so much by the pass when it comes as well. Smart, instinctive and reading the offense and snuffing out plays.

    CB- you need at least one shutdown corner to take away the oppponents best receiver and then the other ones just have to be decent enough to stay with the other receivers who are usually not as good.

    S- You need that help over the top, but a good ED REED here makes a world of a difference.

    Now finally, lets look at our team. What can we do in the offseason to at least make this team a decent team to win some games? Let me give you my honest opinions. The theme is we want to keep the good and GET RID OF THE BAD . IMHO, The offense needs major upgrade, whereas the defense is only a few playmakers away.

    Bulger is damaged goods, he's got to go, although I dont think he was that good of a QB to begin with. Jackson is fine he can stay once he stays healthy, which is now a major concern for us when you talk about backup running backs filling in for him. The backup running back situation seems to be a disarray because Gado, who looked pretty good in the preseason, has not even seen the field this season. Makes you wonder about the trust our staff has in these guys. Cant be much if they dont play them.

    The offensive line? NEEDS MAJOR OVERHAULIN. Jacob Bell has got to go, Not sure about cogs, he seems to be good once he keeps his head in the game, if he continues he has to go too. Brown stays, Jason smith obviously has to earn a spot and ALex barron am not so sure about. Here you have a LT who has the prototype frame to play the position, but has been a major disapointment. Not sure what to say about this guy. Adam Goldberg not so sure about, heard Greco has alot of upside. Kind of iffy O-line but just get the line SHORED UP PLEASE!! PROTECT OUR QB! Randy Mcmichael is ok, daniel fells is showing some great promise, not so sure about Klopfenstein. We are definitely lacking playmakers at WR, all we have is avery and robinson, who are still unproven. Burton is also playing well and I heard about the amendola kid; seems to have made a great impact.

    Now for the defense. We have no pass rush or ability to cover receivers. Leonard little wont be around much longer, and Chris Long has yet to show us whether he belongs at DE or should be playing SLB. Gary Gibson has shown much promise filling in for Carriker, who I dont even know will be successful or not on this team yet alone this league. Hollis thomas was a good FA pickup, and I heard about the Lajuan Ramsey fella; heard that he broke up some plays in the backfield and swarmed the QB. Clifton ryan provides good depth at NT.

    THE BACKERS. James Laur. is a beast, Glad weve got him, but everytime I see Rey Maualuga play makes me wonder whether we should have got him or not instead. Dont know what will happen to WILL witherspoon, seems to get beat real easily. David Vobora is definitely NOT playing like Mr Irrelevant. Not sure what will happen to Larry Grant, but it seems like we are thin at this position as well. I like our safeties in James Butler and OJ hogging up the centerfield. Also Craig Dahl played well in Butlers's absence. I like that.

    The bottom LINE IS THIS: I hope we make some sense out of this draft and draft hard nosed, smart, instinctive players who will fit our scheme abnd be successful? NO need to bring in players who look good in college but dont fit our scheme but we try to use them anyway ...NO NO NO NO!!!! YOU NEED a 4-3 end? bring in a 4-3 end that is a beast then!! dont bring in a 3-4 OLB and try to plug him in.... NO NO NO NO no thats not what we need moving forward because that is KILLING this team. I say we should go DT/DE FIRST, then look at CB. We have so many needs its too much to fill with one draft.

    And plus theres the salary cap situation, something which probably wont be here next year but it isnt official yet. I am not sure what our situation is like but I know it cant be pretty because we have no money to sign some FA to help us. HOW MUCH LONGER IS IT GONNA TAKE??

  • #2
    Re: HOW CLOSE IS THIS TEAM TO COMPETING?(VERY LONG)Please provide feedback

    Good post we need a major overhaul in most areas in this team. I still think Chris long was a good pick he is just working harder every year, remeber mario williams took two years to develop and now he is a beast. Robinson can be a deep threat if he can stay healthy fo a season. As much as i like Bulger it is obvious that he needs to ship out, if not only for the age issue, but drafting a rookie qb is not the answer to this problem. Rookie qb's would crack under our o-line. Ya previous regimes have meesed us up but i trust spags to dig us out.


    • #3
      Re: HOW CLOSE IS THIS TEAM TO COMPETING?(VERY LONG)Please provide feedback

      Great post.

      The Martz/Vermiel era came to and end and with it the players and scheme slowly died out. But, in denial the front office ignored that reality. Bulger was created by (and during) the Martz era and now that, that era is dead - so is he. But again, they pay him a huge contract only to get one of the worst qb's in the league. Now, Kyle Boller looks good compared to him. It's sad.

      After Martz the Rams were just patching this team together year after year, in hopes that they could somehow regain that "GSOT". Doing so, has only made the team worse and worse. They lacked the fortitude to make the tough calls on our roster. They would claim we're "solid" at certain positions and then go into the regular season only to watch these supposed solid players turn out to suck.

      No position's show this more than cornerback, quarterback and middle linebacker. Every year we see the same crap, the same excuses and then the same breakdowns and losses. Now we have such a bad team it can be difficult to make talent evaluations. They did finally address the Middle linebacker spot, but there's still work to be done. Bulger MUST be gone for next year! Not another year, please for all that is holy. Stop living in denial and just accept that he's gone.

      We need to stop settling for average players and go (unapologetically) for the best ones.

      Look at the moves Minnesota has made to better their team. Hutchinson? People here ridiculed them for paying that kind of money. Peterson.. on and on. I see other teams make these big moves that solves big problems on their rosters. Then I see the Rams. Continually living in a dream world that we are SET and fine at various positions.

      Yeah, we're set - if you don't want to win. That's my opinion.


      • #4
        Re: HOW CLOSE IS THIS TEAM TO COMPETING?(VERY LONG)Please provide feedback

        good post/free bump, I agree Bulger needs to go he is scared to death out there,and forces to many passes.


        • #5
          Re: HOW CLOSE IS THIS TEAM TO COMPETING?(VERY LONG)Please provide feedback

          Very good post. You make the point I've realized for a long time, our drafts have really stunk. Plus our FA's outside of Jason Brown this year have been equally bad. We're now paying the price for this ineptitude. We're probably stuck with Bulger for another year or more due to his contract and the cap consequences. This gives us the time to find a a QB of the future to groom for a period until Bulger is cut or traded. Incidentally, Klopfenstein (TE) is no longer on the team.

          I agree with the FO and coaching staff's plan to shore up the lines both defense and offense first then move to the skill positions such as WR and QB. Although we'll have to do them together with lines being the priority. I hope we can accelerate the process with some nifty draft picks and FA acquisitions. I am sure we'll get there. In the meantime....

          Go Rams!


          • #6
            Re: HOW CLOSE IS THIS TEAM TO COMPETING?(VERY LONG)Please provide feedback

            Competing or Competitive? I remember a reporter getting blasted for mixing those two up.


            • #7
              Re: HOW CLOSE IS THIS TEAM TO COMPETING?(VERY LONG)Please provide feedback

              Actually....The Green Bay game we stunk for approx. the first 10 minutes and the last 10 minutes. The 40 minutes in the middle our RAMS competed and gave us a glimmer of hope.
              sigpic :ram::helmet:


              Related Topics


              • rNemesis
                Our draft success sucks!!! Pls read this!!!
                by rNemesis
                All this latest draft talk has left me puzzled. I'm going to get like Jim Rome . Here's what Im burning on:-

                1) DE/DT/ the whole d line- We all know what Suh could and would bring to this team. I dont know if I brought this up before,but Little (35) and Hall ( 33) might now be here next year. IF THEY AREN'T,and we drafted say, Ndamakong Suh, we would have NO ONE TO play right end and no one to help Long on the left when he is NOT in the game. IS THIS NOT A BURNING CONCERN FOR THIS TEAM? I want a decent pass rush next year if nothing else. As a matter of fact, why cant this team have at least ONE GOOD SURE PRODUCT next year ( eg good o line or a good pass rush or good playmaking WR or a lockdown corner or something)? I know it DEFINITELY wont be all because we have too much holes to fill, but we can at least have ONE good thing RIGHt?

                2) O LINE- I dont care about anything what was said about how good or bad this line is, but it would seem to me that in 2009 it was BELOW AVERAGE at best. Some of us say it was pretty good? HOW IS THAT? We gave up 44 sacks ( 25th worst in the NFL) and 98 hits ( 30th worst I think). THAT IS HORRIBLE. It is and you know it. There is no sugar coating it. I am sick and tired of hearing about injuries. yes they exist, but how much longer are we gonna keep getting injured. YOU know what ticks me off about the line situation? In another thread we mentioned Jason Brown in a thread called "HOW BAD IS THE OFFENSIVE LINE" Well, someone brought his durability into question, and I totally agree. He missed almost half of last season, never really impressed me, and got a concussion that most considered " mild". Jacob Bell has not shown greatness yet, Alex barron is a bonehead, and Jason brown was the only real SOLID link on the line. Cogs was also good, but who wants that attitude?

                and the thing is, how can you expect to bring in a Sam Bradford if we havent even shored up the O-line? TOTAL NONSENSE I WOULD NOT DO THAT IF I WERE DEVANEY. as a matter of fact, how can you expect to play at a high level in this league if your line is not as great as a Colts, Pats, or New Orleans line ( all these teams had league lows in sacks allowed in 2009; near the top)

                3) QB- We by now should have nothing but respect for Bulger, his leadership qualities, poise, and toughness. We should also know by now that he wasnt exactly the greatest decision maker/improviser in the pocket. I wouldnt mind at all if he is the starter in 2010, but I really dont think that would be best for this franchise. Our QB status is up in the air at this point, with no parachute landing nowhere in sight. But I do NOT hate Bulger. He did everything he could with the little weapons he had around him. That being said, its probably best to move on.

                4) LB - OH this one puzzles me greatly! I saw the article on another thread talking about potential rams draftees for the LB...
                -03-16-2010, 05:46 PM
              • LaRamsFanLongTime
                This team
                by LaRamsFanLongTime
                Does anyone really think this team is as bad as we are playing right now? I had high hopes for this season and took it pretty badly when we started losing right out the gates. I am trying to think of why and it is so obvious.

                Is it the Coaches fault? It can be but with all the injuries how do you come up with any consistancy in your playbook? Short passes QB dies long Passes QB dies. RB hurt plus the whole line hurt = no run game to take pressure off beat up QB's. So no I could not put this on the coach. Take away Welker, Tom Brady, and The whole o-line and the Patriots are not a great team.

                Lets see now defense? Yeah they still suck and have weekness in every spot. That is an area though I fealt going into this season that was a huge ????? The defense is definatly rebuilding and hopefully the high pick we get will be used on a immediate difference maker.

                Offense see the coach area we all know that an offense that banged up could not put up the numbers we are used too around these parts. Last week though we saw some life out of them.

                So the obvious choice is the reoccuring week defense and banged up offense. I am not sitting here thinking this team will be bad for the next 10 years. I think this season was an injury plagued season that will be long forgotten by mid season next year. Yes I do know that is a long time but we have no choice but to wait it out now do we?

                I think we let Linehan have at least a healthy season to see if he can right the ship. If this team faulters next year then a change should be made. BTW is it just me or should the conditioning coach be put out to pasture.
                -11-01-2007, 04:37 PM
              • Dr. Defense
                My .02
                by Dr. Defense
                So I have refrained from any knee jerk reactions this season, just sitting back and watching as everyone posts ideas that range from super logical to crazy insane and everything in between. After Monday night's game I finally decided that it's my turn to say whats on my mind in no particular order:

                1) We have Steven Jackson. USE HIM. He's the best player on the team, RUN HIM. I never thought I would say that I wish that Shurmer was OC.

                2) That being said, I have a gut feeling Steve Jackson will not be on the team next year. Some HC is going to come in and gut the team, which means that we need money and picks. Trading Steven Jackson gets both. I do NOT want to see him traded at all, but that's what my gut is telling me.

                3) Watching the Seattle game was so hard. It was impossible not to flinch watching that offense out on the field. It was like watching someone smoke in a bomb can only end in disaster.

                4) Sam needs to be benched. Not because he is terrible and not the future of the franchise. But because he is clearly hurt, we are going no where this season, these remaining games mean nothing, and there is no benefit to him playing. We save him if he rides the bench or we destroy him if we play. That's a pretty simple answer if you ask me.

                5) There is NO WAY that we are drafting Luck. So anyone who thinks that needs to get it out of their head. To draft him is going to take a MINIMUM of this years 1st, next years 1st, this years 2nd, probably a 3rd thrown in somewhere and a player. Basically it's going to make the Ricky Williams trade look like a joke. I am not willing to trade all that, just to draft another QB that will fail because we can't build a team around him.

                6) I really really really wanted Spags to be a good head coach, but it's just not working out. I like the team he is building and the system (on defense), but his inability to manage a game or the clock is absurd. The play calling on offense also needs to be called into question. As HC he has ultimate control over it. Why are we playing so conservatively when we have nothing to lose by going for it? He will be released at the end of the season. Who will take over I do not know

                7) NO BIG NAME COACHES WILL SIGN HERE. PERIOD. END OF STORY. Bill Coher doesn't want to come here and fix a giant mess like this. None of these retired guys want to come out to fix us. And for those of you who say we'll pay them out of retirement? Don't you think that they got paid enough as HC's and are making more then enough right now as commentators/analysists? There is zero motivation for them to come here.

                8) Billy will get ONE more year. But it will be a very hot year. I do not blame him for the free agent signings. This team had more holes than the Titanic when he got here. This team has been destroyed by the FA of years past. The contracts were terrible and hampered...
                -12-13-2011, 09:34 PM
              • rNemesis
                Can our RAMS rise back to greatness once again?
                by rNemesis
                This article is what I always think about, and maybe similar to what Bryan Burwell wrote about in a previous thread called " RAMS HAVE CHANCE TO DEFINE SEASON".. I really loved that article and it reminded me of what I want to talk about, and that is the rise of a team to greatness/elite status, whether it be once again, or finally for the first time.

                Our Rams have been through a lot of ups and downs. Historically, we have been both good and bad; that is, we've been right there at the top and right there at the bottom at any given year. We've had the championship in cleveland in the 50's or 60's or so and went to the bowl against the steelers in the late 70's, went to the NFC championship game against the bears in 85, the eagles in 2001, and a host of other great playoff games. And of course the 90's were fairly bad until 99. But those were all different teams with different identities.

                Lets look at the GSOT. Now this was arguably the best RAMS team to EVER take the football field, with the closest second probably being that "FEARSOME FOURSOME" rams team, with Deacon Jones, Merlin Olsen, etc. The GSOT offense consisted of Kurt Warner at QB ( due to Trent Green's season ending injury), Torry Holt, Isaac Bruce, Ricky Proehl, and Marshall Faulk. On the defensive side of the ball, they had Grant Wistrom, London Fletcher, Aeneas Williams, etc. We had a team that was offensively unstoppable and defensively capable of getting stops and/or turnovers. Always an opportunistic defense. This was also what I would have called ELITE STATUS in the NFL: winning in the NFL alot and consistently. But, as time passed, bad decision making, poor drafting and personnel decisions, and retirement pushed this team into the abyss for about three years ( 2007-2009), which there was no excuse for.

                There were other ELITE teams, but I am not sure who to call because at that time most were only GOOD themselves, not as GREAT as what they are now. Teams like the Eagles, Colts, Falcons, Seahawks, Chiefs, Raiders, Ravens, and Buccaneers were all examples of good teams, but I really dont think none were as good overall as the Rams (GSOT) were. Some have stayed perenially good, others have fallen a bit, some have been up and down. But no one has been as bad as the Rams have been through a three year period.

                We have seen the RAMS as bad as they were for that three year period. And we have seen the GSOT and how GREAT they were. NOW, we are in a rebuilding mode since and have gotten a lot to show for it; obviously not GREAT yet, but decent and respectable, which is all you can ask for when you go 6-42 over three seasons. My point is this. When do you think we can reach that ELITE status again and roam the NFL earth beating foes as we try to climb that mountain to the top?

                My feeling is, it shouldnt take long at all considering where we at. We've got a nice QB, good MLB, good...
                -12-02-2010, 12:45 PM
              • RamsFanSam
                OK, convince me!
                by RamsFanSam
                I have read plenty of posts from people saying fans shouldn't look at the bright side of last night's defeat, that instead we should all don sackcloth and ashes, and mourn the death of the 2008 season for our Rams.

                Convince me why I should!

                I watched only the first quarter, but I did listen to the entire game. Of course, the TV broadcast was done by the Titans Network, meaning that the commentary was biased in favor of the Titans. The other 3 quarters was a mix of NFL's gamecenter and KTVI audio, niether of which was very good.

                What I came out of the media barrage I witnessed is the following:

                1. Marc looked a little rusty. Of course, considering that there was only TWO others on the offense who had ever played in Saunder's system, I expected to see some confusion. But, I guess that since Marc didn't launch a 99 yard Hail Mary for 6 on the first possession means that Marc is all washed up. After all, when a reciever isn't in the right place at the right time, it's always the QB's fault.

                2. I also saw a really good defense beat our O-line. Considering that these front five guys have NEVER played a single game together before, We know it's all Pace's fault. He is all washed up, and we should have traded for Jake Long and then overpaid him to take Pace's spot.

                3. I saw 2 passes go long, so long that no one on either team had a chance to get to them. It didn't matter that both times the recievers were double covered and had no chance in hell of breaking away, those recievers must suck, so we should have traded them for some untested rookie. Darn Linehan for drafting someone who has skills that our offense could use instead of some other rookie!

                4. I saw our defense get beat up. Badly. Even though they made a solid stand in the red zone, we know they suck. It doesn't matter that some of our starters were out, we should have beaten the Titans back into the stone age with undersized, inexperienced rookies. It's all Haslett's fault for not having UFA's and rookies available that we can afford.

                5. Our "wannabe's" didn't come back in the second half and win the game. Of course, they have had a whole 90 days or so to forget everything they ever learned about football just to learn football all over again. I forget that other millionaires such as Bill Gates have been there before. Didn't he have to forget everything he knew about Windows 98 to learn Windows XP in just 90 days? He didn't? Oh my. Those rookies and coaches have to go....NOW!

                So, as you can see, I am NOT saying everything will be OK by next week. In fact, I'll be happy if we win 3 of our first 8, and come out 8-8 this season. I know all is not well in St. Louis as of yet, and I didn't expect it to be. Last year I had hope, because everything was in place. This year, we have a tougher schedule, most of our great players are either gone or they are getting...
                -08-10-2008, 03:41 PM