Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A Fearsome Front Seven

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 2
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 template Next
  • #1

    A Fearsome Front Seven

    Well watching the Rams defensive line struggle to consistently apply pressure to Quarterbacks has been hard for all of us to watch and specifically hard on our secondary as we've watched them be picked apart on a weekly basis. We rank near the bottom if not AT the bottom in interceptions and have seen not a single one of our cornerbacks get one all season (this was ALMOST changed by Gorrer this weekend..).

    This is partly due no doubt to injuries to our starters as well but little excuse can be made for our D-Line's inconsistency this year. Guys like ryan, long, scott, and douzable have all shown flashes but inconsistency remains to be the issue as quarterbacks continue to have all day to throw.

    With Spags being a defensive guy and being known especially for his defensive line expertise, we can look to what we can expect this offseason. If we draft Suh with the first overall pick, which looks to almost be a lock with the only other option i see is us marketing the pick around to other teams for more picks, this is what we will be working with.

    Little (If he stays another year), Suh, Carriker/Ryan/Scott, and Long. In theory that could be the best D-Line in football. With Lau playing Mike next year the rams should look to finding either two pass rushers for the outside backer spots are a combination of pass rusher and run stopper. With guys like Sean Weatherspoon who could easily slip to the second you have your pass rusher. If we can add another pass rusher or simply a solid outside backer through free agency or the draft we suddenly have possibly the best front seven in football.

    of course all of this is a LOT of speculating on what the rams are aiming to do but this all sounds to be a reasonable course of action me. If we're going to build this defense up. It starts up front naturally. Build that D-Line, then the Backers, then the secondary.

    There's a number of routes the rams could take in this draft to building a powerhouse D and if the guys im naming pan out there is no reason we shouldn't be next year.

    Who do you guys think we should grab in the second round, if you think we should go defense at all?
    Last edited by Guest; -12-28-2009, 06:42 PM.
    Tags: None
  • #2
    Re: A Fearsome Front Seven

    Best defensive line? Probably in a year or two, but I don't think the addition of Suh will instantly eclipse Minnesota's line

    Comment

    • #3
      Re: A Fearsome Front Seven

      Do you realize the Rams have used 50% of their first round picks in the last ten years on defensive linemen? Where are we now? Two of the last three years have seen us pick DEs, which has not turned out very well. We are hoping Chris Long will mature into a good DE, but that is not a sure thing. What about Adam Carriker? Please, I am very skeptical about using yet another draft pick on a DL.

      We have passed up several franchise QBs for marginal talent the last few years. Even under the best circumstances (if Su turns out to be a stud), our offense will be doing three and outs and our defense will be exhausted by the second quarter. We desperately need a long-term QB, far worse than we need another DL.

      Comment

      • #4
        Re: A Fearsome Front Seven

        Originally posted by swatter555 View Post
        Do you realize the Rams have used 50% of their first round picks in the last ten years on defensive linemen? Where are we now? Two of the last three years have seen us pick DEs, which has not turned out very well. We are hoping Chris Long will mature into a good DE, but that is not a sure thing. What about Adam Carriker? Please, I am very skeptical about using yet another draft pick on a DL.

        We have passed up several franchise QBs for marginal talent the last few years. Even under the best circumstances (if Su turns out to be a stud), our offense will be doing three and outs and our defense will be exhausted by the second quarter. We desperately need a long-term QB, far worse than we need another DL.
        True, Swatter, we have passed over QBs for DLs and haven't exactly rocked the world, but when you look at a line that features (potentially) Suh, Carriker and Long, you've got several dementions to it. The beauty of Suh is, hell, the guy can fall back for a pick to get the O decent field position in at least a few situation and probably help us notch up at least a few more wins in the process.

        If he's batting down passes at the line, tip drilling and causing double teams from day one, I can't see any value in drafting Clausen or Bradford when a guy like Locker's sitting out there in '11.

        Comment

        • #5
          Re: A Fearsome Front Seven

          Originally posted by swatter555 View Post
          Do you realize the Rams have used 50% of their first round picks in the last ten years on defensive linemen? Where are we now? Two of the last three years have seen us pick DEs, which has not turned out very well. We are hoping Chris Long will mature into a good DE, but that is not a sure thing. What about Adam Carriker? Please, I am very skeptical about using yet another draft pick on a DL.

          We have passed up several franchise QBs for marginal talent the last few years. Even under the best circumstances (if Su turns out to be a stud), our offense will be doing three and outs and our defense will be exhausted by the second quarter. We desperately need a long-term QB, far worse than we need another DL.
          Just because they have used picks on DL players before that didnt work out before doesnt mean they shouldnt again. Should the Rams not have picked Steven Jackson because they previously picked Trung Canidate and Lawrence Phillips in the first round?

          First of all, in the last two years one of the guys we picked was a DT. He was a 3-4 DE in college, but is better suited to playing DT in the NFL. He was coming on strong but his injuries have held him back. I dont know how you can say that the Chris Long pick didnt turn out well though. If you have seen a game recently, the guy is beastly.

          We have passed up several "franchise QBs" for marginal talent? Not so sure about that. At the time of picking, the only instance i can recall when the Rams actually passed on picking a QB that they could have got that wouldnt have been a reach was passing on Jay Cutler to take Hill. And you can argue that CB was a bigger need then what with Bulger having played well at the time. Even then, the bigger annoyance was that the Rams passed on drafint Haloti Ngata to take Hill

          Another point is that you seem to think the only way we can get a QB is by drafting one and having him play right away this year. If you have seen a Jets game recently you might see why thats not ideal. You havent even factored in the idea that we could pick Suh in the first, grab a QB to develop in a later round, and pick up a free agent QB to hold the reigns while said QB develops into a stud. Thats the best circumstances we could have this offseason.
          @EssexRam_

          Comment

          • #6
            Re: A Fearsome Front Seven

            Originally posted by Bralidore(RAMMODE) View Post
            Who do you guys think we should grab in the second round, if you think we should go defense at all?
            I'm with you on Sean Weatherspoon. I have the Rams taking him with first pick in the 2nd round in my S.O.S Mock 1.0 which is posted in the Draft & FA forum.

            Another possibility could be Everson Griffin, the DE from USC.

            At any rate, I like the thoughts that you are putting down.

            WHAT SAY YE?

            Comment

            • #7
              Re: A Fearsome Front Seven

              I only see 2 of our current front 7 as a lock for next seasons front 7. They would be Chris Long and Lauranitis. The other 5 spots are up for grabs in my opinion.

              :helmet:
              sigpic :ram::helmet:

              Comment

              • #8
                Re: A Fearsome Front Seven

                If we end up with Suh, I'd feel pretty good about Suh at UT and Scott/Ryan platooning at NT. Carriker is a wild card. It would be nice to see him come back and play a role.

                Long holds one DE spot. I'm not counting on either Little or Hall returning (not to say they can't, but I'm not counting on it), so its wide open. I think the Rams should look at some mid-level FAs (Darryl Tapp might be worth consideration) and slot the DE spot for around the 4th or 5th round of the draft. You might not get a "complete player" at that spot, but there are likely to be some pass rush specialists who could come in and contribute.

                If the Rams end up with the second pick, that changes things. Right now, I'd rather take Derrick Morgan than Gerald McCoy. That would mean the Rams would be set at the starting DE spot with Long and Morgan, but might need to upgrade the DT spot later in the draft.

                At LB, the only sure thing is Laurinaitis. I wouldn't mind seeing some FA money spent at one of the OLB spots. I don't think the Rams can afford to dedicate a high draft choice to the LB position, unless there is a truly great value pick to be had.

                Comment

                • #9
                  Re: A Fearsome Front Seven

                  I agree, although i do think, on defense, OLB is our next big area of concern. Vobora has been solid but if there's a guy out there who can rush the passer better or has more upside then we need to definitely upgrade to him. The other OLB spot needs to be upgraded definitely, Lenon is backup at best. heck truthfully Vobora probably is as well.

                  About Carriker, you have to give the guy another shot. He's shown some flashes and you don't want him going to another team and showing out while all of a sudden being healthy..(now what players have we had that has done that..). If he gets injured for an extended period again however, its adios.

                  At RE, I agree we should look for a pass rushing specialist over a run-stopping end.

                  And again with the second pick, its all about whos there, as we have gone over in previous threads there's a good chance a lot of first round talent could fall to the early second round, if that is the case you'll have to weigh your options and see whos the biggest steal while also trying to fill a need.
                  Last edited by Guest; -12-29-2009, 09:51 AM.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Re: A Fearsome Front Seven

                    If healthy I have a good feeling about our front 4. A prospect that is still creeping up on the horizon is the off chance that Osi wants to play for his old D-coordinator! He's very unhappy in NY, and he's been relegated to back-up duty by a desperate coordinator there.

                    DeSpags would do us very well to let Little go, bump Long to LE and sign Osi on for a few years. Then draft that monster Suh! C'mon people let's do this.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Re: A Fearsome Front Seven

                      I guess I will never understand this single-minded obsession about drafting DLs by the Rams, especially considering the historical lack of success we have had. Our defense was bad this year, but it was just a symptom of a greater problem- our offense sticking up the place.

                      If we once again relegate the rebuilding of our offense to 3rd or 4th round picks and cheap free agents, we will once again stink. That is the long and short of it. I know that picking a QB with a high pick is risky, but as the Rams have proved, so is drafting DLs.

                      And I am not advocating throwing a rookie QB to the wolves like Mark Sanchez and the Jets, but damn you have to at least try to get the top notch talent. Hoping for a diamond in the rough (drafting a QB later than the 1st round) is a much greater gamble than using a 1st round pick one.

                      We have soaked too many picks into a couple of positions, its time to move on. If the Rams pass up another star QB in the draft to pick a bust, this franchise will continue its losing ways well into the future.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Re: A Fearsome Front Seven

                        Originally posted by AvengerRam View Post
                        ...If the Rams end up with the second pick, that changes things...

                        ACK!!! Don't even say (think) that. As much as I hate losing to the Bozos-By-The-Bay, we could really use a DT like Suh. A win next weekend would be relatively pointless. It's not going to prove anything. I understand that it would be nice to get one last win under our belts. I just don't think a win would propel us to victory next season. Nor would a loss doom us to the basement. Just think of how sick you'd be watching the Lions D-line getting penetration up the middle behind Suh, while we struggle to keep it together again next season. That would be truly painful.

                        If the Niners really want to hurt us, they'll find a way to let us win next week.

                        I've seen significantly more effort from the Rams players this season. What we a sorely lacking is talent. I think the #1 pick might help us take care of one gaping hole (DT). If next season is uncapped, we might be able to do quite a bit. If our ownership is so inclined.
                        That's my story, and I'm sticking to it!!

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Re: A Fearsome Front Seven

                          Hey, if the Colts can play scrubs to lose, we can too, right? ;)

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            Re: A Fearsome Front Seven

                            Originally posted by Blankman17 View Post
                            Hey, if the Colts can play scrubs to lose, we can too, right? ;)
                            I thought we already were.....:red:

                            I had to...

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              Re: A Fearsome Front Seven

                              Originally posted by swatter555 View Post
                              I guess I will never understand this single-minded obsession about drafting DLs by the Rams, especially considering the historical lack of success we have had. Our defense was bad this year, but it was just a symptom of a greater problem- our offense sticking up the place.

                              If we once again relegate the rebuilding of our offense to 3rd or 4th round picks and cheap free agents, we will once again stink. That is the long and short of it. I know that picking a QB with a high pick is risky, but as the Rams have proved, so is drafting DLs.

                              And I am not advocating throwing a rookie QB to the wolves like Mark Sanchez and the Jets, but damn you have to at least try to get the top notch talent. Hoping for a diamond in the rough (drafting a QB later than the 1st round) is a much greater gamble than using a 1st round pick one.

                              We have soaked too many picks into a couple of positions, its time to move on. If the Rams pass up another star QB in the draft to pick a bust, this franchise will continue its losing ways well into the future.
                              And what if the Rams pass up the top talent in the draft to draft a QB of the future in turn ends up a bust? You act like picking a first round QB is a sure thing, and mention previous Rams DL players that didnt pan out. Well what about first round QBs like Joey Harrington, David Carr, Brady Quinn, Byron Leftwich, Kyle Boller, Alex Smith, Matt Leinart and JaMarcus Russell?

                              The fact is this team is lacking in talent across the board, not just at QB. So we should be taking the best player available when we pick, not reaching for a QB.

                              I also dont know why you think they have only been getting "cheap" FAs in to improve the offense. In the two most recent offseasons the Rams have spent big money bringing in Jacob Bell and Jason Brown, two premier offensive linemen who were among the top free agents available at their positions. They have really played well this year. Combine that with the fact that Devaney now has us out of the cap hell we were in, dont be surprised if the Rams make another splash in free agency.
                              @EssexRam_

                              Comment

                              Previous 1 2 template Next

                              Related Topics

                              Collapse
                              • RamsFanSam
                                Positions of need vs. BPA
                                by RamsFanSam
                                This is always a debateable subject, positions of need vs. best player available. Myself, I waiver from round to round each draft. This year, we are guaranteed a top 2 pick, most likely a first overall. So, what do we do with it? Well, this is where I decide to do a little bit of prognosticating - in two different directions.

                                As of this point, there is one name being mentioned as the best college player headed to the draft: Ndamukong Suh. That may change by the combine, but that's doubtful. His value right now is off the charts - kind of like having the Fridge William Perry's best years in a nice neat package with a dose of Nighttrain Lane as a garnish. Whether or not that will be how it turns out is still anyone's guess.

                                So what happens if we draft him and this is how he looks after camp?

                                We instantly have a respectable, feared defense. This season, we have seen Chris Long double teamed, James Lauraintis become a top-level MLB, and an aging DE in Little still viable. We have also seen some of the depth players (like Douzable and Scott) step up and make plays at times. Our run defense is OK, but not good enough. Our passing defense - well, to be honest, it sucks. With Long unable to get free on a regular basis, and the line being held back, as well as Little/Hall being covered, well, it's hard to keep those long passes from being completed against our secondary.
                                With Suh out front, as well as Long, hopefully Carriker, Ryan, and whoever, we force other teams to CHOOSE who they want to take a chance on double teaming. Long's ability to break free would be increased, leading to a lot more pressure and sacks, forcing our opponents to get rid of the ball faster, or turn it over. Suh would also have the chance to get to the QB, and this would result in a ripple effect. With Long AND Suh both being watched, the rest of the D line would have better opportunity to penetrate the O line, resulting in more hurried passes.
                                And the result of those hurried passes? A better performing secondary. That's right - when a QB is rushed on a pass, his accuracy drops. When his accuracy drops, the ball is NOT thrown "between the numbers", meaning more often than not, it's up for grabs.
                                Add to this the addition to our run blocking Suh would bring - teams would be forced to look at running to the outside more - something that makes me nervous, as I am not sure we can cover the outside without upgrades.
                                So, what do I see as a result? A huge improvement in our defense overall, since any QB with a second or more was shredding our D all of this season. Take that away, and we would have been winning several games in 2009.

                                What if we decide to trade away our first pick?

                                This is where it gets sticky. Depending on his value after the combine, we could get anywhere from an extra 2nd round pick to an existing player plus a late-round pick. For the sake of simplicity, let's use...
                                -12-29-2009, 12:02 PM
                              • Bar-bq
                                Impact Players
                                by Bar-bq
                                Something struck me today when posting in another thread about the first overall pick this april and the impact either Bradford or Suh could have on the players around them. I made the case that both players have the potential to significantly impact the players around them in the long term, whilst Suh probably has the advantage of being able to do so almost from the first day of practise.

                                I started to wonder why that is and I think it comes down to something deeper than the well-stated grooming period for rookie QBs. Our situation is quite particular because of who we have on defense. We may well return all of our starters at every position except for Defensive End. (Obviously Bradley Fletcher will be plugged in at corner in an attempt to stop some of the bleeding from the position last season. For the purposes of this discussion, he doesn't count because he's already on the roster.) Whilst I would not be entirely comfortable with this (we'll need a DE ASAP if Little doesn't return) I am much more comfortable with returning our starters on defense than on offense.

                                In my opinion, a player like Suh can make these already established starters a whole lot better. It's a given that the play of the linebackers flanking Lauriniatis, which was heavily criticised last season, stands to see exponential levels of improvement with a better pass rush. And I say this completely aware that the incumbent starters may return to their positions in the first unit. We're not exactly missing a Defensive Tackle in particular, but we are lacking a pass rush in the worst way. Suh will go a long way to providing that, putting Chris Long, and everybody else up front for that matter, in a better position to make plays.

                                I can't say I can see the same thing on the offense. Despite our best efforts, our OL is still a mess. Jason Smith, Jason Brown and Jacob Bell are the building blocks and it looks like Alex Barron might be back. For argument's sake, I'll say that only two of the five positions are secure. I'm not convinced Bell won't have to fight to keep his job. We are devoid of a second runningback and our receiving corps is still under question. Lord knows who our starting Tight End will be.

                                My point is this: the immediate potential Sam Bradford could show as a member of the St. Louis Rams is mooted by the players around him, or the lack thereof. Not all needs can be filled in one offseason and if Bradford were the pick, I wouldn't expect him to start this season anyway. It just seems to me like the supporting cast on defense is much stronger than what we have on the other side of the ball.

                                I'm completely undecided as to who should be our pick. I was a huge advocate of Suh when the season ended but the arguments in favour of a QB are equally as strong. If we draft Bradford, it's going to be a good day to be a Detroit Lions fan. They got their guy last season. They have one of the best WR's to...
                                -03-13-2010, 12:35 AM
                              • AvengerRam_old
                                DT: Need...? No. BPA...? Maybe.
                                by AvengerRam_old
                                Clifton Ryan
                                Darrel Scott
                                Fred Robbins
                                Adam Carriker

                                Is that a great DT rotation? Perhaps not. But it is not a bad DT rotation. Robbins is an established run stopper. Ryan is an underrated plugger. Scott showed some potential as a rookie. Carriker is a wild card.

                                I'd say that there is enough talent there to conclude that DT is not a Round 1 (or even Round 2) priority in the draft.

                                So does that mean that the Rams will take Sam Bradford?

                                Not so fast.

                                There is no question that the Rams are considering Bradford, but the decision has not been made yet. The Rams may still conclude that Ndamukong Suh or Gerald McCoy is the best player available.

                                So how would that work if they took one of the two Blue Chip DTs?

                                You'd likely see Ryan and Suh/McCoy starting, Robbins the designated short yardage player, and Scott platooning in to give the starters a break. Carriker would have to either rise in the lineup, move to DE, or move on.

                                But if the Rams ultimately go with Bradford, I think the Rams could go through the entire draft witout taking a DT.
                                -03-09-2010, 11:57 AM
                              • Frito
                                Ndamukong Suh
                                by Frito
                                Best Player in the Draft Period.

                                We need players to build a franchise.

                                Remember when we drafted Orlando Pace?
                                He started his rookie season at LT and dominated.

                                Remember when we drafted Torry Holt?
                                He started at WR and dominated.

                                When there is a phenom player that you know will succeed you take him. You don't take chances with a guy that you hope will develop or has good potential at a position of need.

                                Right now we need guys at every position so, why not take The Best Player In College? Arguably deserving of the Heisman as a Defensive Linemen.

                                The most important pieces to a winning team are the Offensive and Defensive Lines anyway in my opinion.

                                A GREAT D-LINE makes average linbackers and secondary look like superstars. LB's all of a sudden dont have linemen blocking them and the secondary doesnt have to cover as long.

                                A GREAT O-LINE makes average qb's, rb's and wr's go to Hawaii.

                                With "Ndamukong Suh" I believe he would come in immediatly and command double and triple teams. This would make Long look like his dad Howieback in the day. Leonard would find the fountain of youth and Lauranitus would look like a healthy Urlacher. Our secondary wouldnt find the need to cover guys for 7 seconds anymore either. Guess what that means? Some 3 and outs for a change, so maybe the offence could have a lot more chances to hand the ball to Steven Jackson.

                                Just a dream i had last night. :ram:
                                -11-10-2009, 09:16 PM
                              • Nick
                                The Rams are officially on the clock!
                                by Nick
                                Their loss to the ***** today secured the first overall pick for St. Louis.

                                Now, who to pick? Where does the Clan stand now that the season is officially over?
                                Ndamukong Suh (DT, Nebraska)
                                87.63%
                                85
                                Eric Berry (DB, Tennessee)
                                1.03%
                                1
                                Gerald McCoy (DT, Okalahoma)
                                0.00%
                                0
                                Russell Okung (OT, Oklahoma State)
                                0.00%
                                0
                                Sam Bradford (QB, Oklahoma)
                                3.09%
                                3
                                Jimmy Clausen (QB, Notre Dame)
                                8.25%
                                8
                                Dez Bryant (WR, Oklahoma State)
                                0.00%
                                0
                                Other (please respond & specify)
                                0.00%
                                0
                                -01-03-2010, 01:22 PM
                              Working...
                              X