Which team, the Rams or the Cardinals, can claim Kurt Warner as primarily "their player"?
Its a close question. Kurt enjoyed great success on both teams, and is viewed by both franchises as one of (if not the) best QBs ever to put on their uniform.
So... let's go to the tail of the tape.
CATEGORY---------RAMS---------CARDINALS
Games Played--------53--------------62
Starts---------------50--------------57
Wins (in starts)------35--------------27
Completion %-------66.4------------65.1
Yards Passing-----14,447----------15,843
Touchdowns--------102-------------100
Interceptions--------65--------------59
Passer Rating-------97.2------------91.9
So, overall, while it is close, Kurt had better numbers as a Ram.
Add in that he went to more Pro Bowls (3 to 1), was on more 1st Team All-Pro lists (2 to 0), went to more Super Bowls (2 to 1) and won his only championship with the Rams, and I view Kurt Warner as a Ram, first and foremost.
That said, these numbers show just one more way that Kurt Warner was a unique player in NFL history. He is the only QB in the history of the game to throw for 100 or more TDs for two different teams in a career. He is also one of only two QBs to ever start a Super Bowl for two different teams (the other being Craig Morton).
So, maybe, in the end, much like the Arizona and St. Louis share the name "Cardinals" in their history, they can also share Kurt Warner as a member of their respective lists of all-time greats.
Kurt, of course, probably wouldn't have it any other way.
-10-03-2012, 09:01 AM
Comment