02.12.2010 11:55 am
How much can new owner help Rams?
By Roger Hensley
THE WATERCOOLER
QUESTION: How much influence do you think an NFL owner has on how his team performs on the field?
JIM THOMAS
All the difference in the world. Whether it’s more of a hands-on owner, or someone who delegates, an owner sets the standard for an organization, establishes a level of accountability, and sets the bar on expectations. And of course, the owner also signs the checks, which can determine how aggressive or how passive a team is when it comes to talent acquisition.
BRYAN BURWELL
An intelligent owner with deep pockets or a dumb one with little cash can have an enormous impact on the success or failure of a team. Smart guys with money can provide the wherewithall to go after the best talent available.
BILL COATS
A lot. He hires the top front-office people and is heavily involved in hiring the head coach, plus he sets the budget for free agency, the draft, etc. Those are all entities that funnel into how a team performs on the field.
JEFF GORDON
The owner has an enormous impact. Even a hands-off owner makes the most important decision — hiring the person who oversees the daily operation of the franchise. It all flows down from there. Look at the Colts with Bill Polian. Jim Irsay is a fairly involved owner for that franchise, but his team president runs the program. Here in St. Louis, ownership has been directly involved in hiring and firing coaches, general managers and team presidents. All of that translates to success (or, in the Rams’ case, failure) on the field.
KEVIN WHEELER (Host of “Sports Open Line” on KMOX)
It depends on whether or not they know how to hire good people. The one constant with “loser” franchises like Oakland, Detroit and Cincinnati (with a few years as exceptions) has been a lack of leadership and solid decision making at the very top. The owner hires the President and GM so if he blows it with those two positions the on-field product will definitely suffer. If the owner is notoriously cheap and fails to offer adequate bonus money to free agents or adequate salaries to assistant coaches, the on-field product will most certainly suffer.
Owners can be hands-on or hands-off and succeed either way so long as they show good judgment in hiring people in key positions, including the head coach, and so long as they adequately fund the team and allow the personnel guys to spend what is necessary to fill holes.
How much can new owner help Rams?
By Roger Hensley
THE WATERCOOLER
QUESTION: How much influence do you think an NFL owner has on how his team performs on the field?
JIM THOMAS
All the difference in the world. Whether it’s more of a hands-on owner, or someone who delegates, an owner sets the standard for an organization, establishes a level of accountability, and sets the bar on expectations. And of course, the owner also signs the checks, which can determine how aggressive or how passive a team is when it comes to talent acquisition.
BRYAN BURWELL
An intelligent owner with deep pockets or a dumb one with little cash can have an enormous impact on the success or failure of a team. Smart guys with money can provide the wherewithall to go after the best talent available.
BILL COATS
A lot. He hires the top front-office people and is heavily involved in hiring the head coach, plus he sets the budget for free agency, the draft, etc. Those are all entities that funnel into how a team performs on the field.
JEFF GORDON
The owner has an enormous impact. Even a hands-off owner makes the most important decision — hiring the person who oversees the daily operation of the franchise. It all flows down from there. Look at the Colts with Bill Polian. Jim Irsay is a fairly involved owner for that franchise, but his team president runs the program. Here in St. Louis, ownership has been directly involved in hiring and firing coaches, general managers and team presidents. All of that translates to success (or, in the Rams’ case, failure) on the field.
KEVIN WHEELER (Host of “Sports Open Line” on KMOX)
It depends on whether or not they know how to hire good people. The one constant with “loser” franchises like Oakland, Detroit and Cincinnati (with a few years as exceptions) has been a lack of leadership and solid decision making at the very top. The owner hires the President and GM so if he blows it with those two positions the on-field product will definitely suffer. If the owner is notoriously cheap and fails to offer adequate bonus money to free agents or adequate salaries to assistant coaches, the on-field product will most certainly suffer.
Owners can be hands-on or hands-off and succeed either way so long as they show good judgment in hiring people in key positions, including the head coach, and so long as they adequately fund the team and allow the personnel guys to spend what is necessary to fill holes.