Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2017 Rams Opening Day Starters (a hopeful, but reasonable, projection)

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 2017 Rams Opening Day Starters (a hopeful, but reasonable, projection)

    Here is the opening day lineup I'm hoping for. I'm presuming that we let Kenny Britt and T.J. McDonald go as a FAs, and cut Lance Kendricks, Rodger Saffold and William Hayes. Greg Robinson is maintained (if he can't be traded) because cutting him saves $0 on the cap. I'm also projecting a base 3-4, though that is somewhat flexible under Wade Phillips.

    Key
    Holdover player (currently signed through 2017)

    Holdover player (FA to be re-signed)
    Free agent (UFA to be signed)
    Rookie (Rounds 2-4 of draft)

    QB Jared Goff
    RB Todd Gurley

    WR DeSean Jackson (Redskins)
    WR Pharoh Cooper
    WR Tavon Austin
    TE Tyler Higbee
    TE Jordan Leggett (Clemson, Rd 3)
    LT Andrew Whitworth (Bengals)
    LG Larry Warford (Lions)
    C Pat Elflein (Ohio State, Rd 2)
    RG Jamon Brown
    RT Rob Havenstein

    DE Aaron Donald
    NT Michael Brockers
    DE
    Dominique Easley

    OLB Ejuan Price (Pittsburgh, Rd 4)
    ILB Alec Ogletree
    ILB
    Kevin Minter (Cardinals)

    OLB Robert Quinn
    CB
    Trumaine Johnson
    CB E.J. Gaines
    CB Lamarcus Joyner
    SS Marc Barron
    FS Mo Alexander
    Last edited by AvengerRam; -02-09-2017, 10:36 AM.

  • #2
    Originally posted by RamFanEsq View Post
    Here is the opening day lineup I'm hoping for. I'm presuming that we let Kenny Britt and T.J. McDonald go as a FAs, and cut Lance Kendricks, Rodger Saffold and William Hayes. Greg Robinson is maintained (if he can't be traded) because cutting him saves $0 on the cap. I'm also projecting a base 3-4, though that is somewhat flexible under Wade Phillips.

    Key
    Holdover player (currently signed through 2017)

    Holdover player (FA to be re-signed)
    Free agent (UFA to be signed)
    Rookie (Rounds 2-4 of draft)

    QB Jared Goff
    RB Todd Gurley

    WR DeSean Jackson (Redskins)
    WR Pharoh Cooper
    WR Tavon Austin
    TE Tyler Higbee
    TE Jordan Leggett (Clemson, Rd 3)
    LT Andrew Whitworth (Bengals)
    LG Larry Warford (Lions)
    C Pat Elflein (Ohio State, Rd 2)
    RG Jamon Brown
    RT Rob Havenstein

    DE Aaron Donald
    NT Michael Brockers
    DE
    Dominique Easley

    OLB Ejuan Price (Pittsburgh, Rd 4)
    ILB Alec Ogletree
    ILB
    Kevin Minter (Cardinals)

    OLB Robert Quinn
    CB
    Trumaine Johnson
    CB E.J. Gaines
    CB Lamarcus Joyner
    SS Marc Barron
    FS Mo Alexander
    I like what you've done here. I believe we'll have a lot of success using 12 players on the field at a time.
    The more things change, the more they stay the same.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by HUbison View Post

      I like what you've done here. I believe we'll have a lot of success using 12 players on the field at a time.
      Sigh.

      Yes, I've listed 12 players on each side. The reason is that, in today's NFL, a "starting lineup" can vary. On offense, the skill positions used to be RB, FB, WR, WR, TE. Now, the FB position barely exists, many team use two TE sets, and many use 3 (or more) WR sets. To account for this reality, I included two TEs and 3 WRs (and no FB).

      On defense, the third CB is on the field as much or more than traditional "starters," so I've included 3 CBs as starters.

      Of course, you knew that, HUb, and you're just being snarky.

      You'd better not try to pull that kind of crap with me in person. If you did, I'd pull up a chair, climb on top of it, slap you, and run really fast out of the room.
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      For those who are unaware, this illustration shows HUb's size relative to mine:
      Last edited by AvengerRam; -02-09-2017, 02:02 PM.

      Comment


      • #4
        I'd be pretty excited if these were the starters on opening day. Jackson, Whitworth, Warford, and Minter would be a hell of a FA class.

        Comment


        • #5
          I believe that the Rams offense would be less predictible and Gurley would be more productive if the Rams went back to a 2 running back set ala Robert Holcome and the Greatest Show On Turf.
          :helmet:

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by r8rh8rmike View Post
            I'd be pretty excited if these were the starters on opening day. Jackson, Whitworth, Warford, and Minter would be a hell of a FA class.
            You never know who will sign where, but I think its at least plausible.

            Jackson makes a lot of sense, as many have noted, due to his ties to McVay and the state of California. At his age, I think the price would be high, but not outrageous.

            Whitworth is also up there in years, so I'd envision a 2-3 year deal. The Bengals will likely pay top dollar to re-sign Kevin Zeitler which, hopefully, might mean that they'll let Whitworth go.

            The Lions are in a similar boat with their OL. They have LT Riley Reiff and Warford due for new contracts. Hopefully, they'll let Warford hit the market.

            Finally, the Cardinals have a major FA problem this offseason. Before they can even think about Minter, they need to sign Chandler Jones and Calais Campbell. I think Minter would be an excellent fit in the middle next to Ogletree.

            Heck, if we could get two of these four guys, it would be great! Here's hoping!

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by RamFanEsq View Post
              Heck, if we could get two of these four guys, it would be great!
              I absolutely agree.

              Comment


              • #8
                Tremendous job, RFE. I have a few thoughts though....

                1.) I would love A.Whitworth at OLT but I gotta believe at this point in his career he is looking to play on a team that has a realistic chance at a Super Bowl. I know most think that money talks but that isn't always the case, especially with guys in the twilight of their career.

                2.) Like your draft picks but really think the Rams go for a corner EARLY- somewhere in rounds 2 or 3.

                3.) I'm somewhat nervous with Mark Barron moving back to safety. It is my understanding that he just can't cover well enough to warrant being a starter. I get the bad feeling his best position is exactly how Fish/Williams used him last year and, alas, this will not be possible in a Wade Phillips defense. Hope I'm wrong but that's my take on this topic.

                4.) Don't know anything about Ejuan Price.....is he a good pass rusher and what do you see that he brings to the table?

                WHAT SAY YE?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by RAMarkable View Post
                  Tremendous job, RFE. I have a few thoughts though....

                  1.) I would love A.Whitworth at OLT but I gotta believe at this point in his career he is looking to play on a team that has a realistic chance at a Super Bowl. I know most think that money talks but that isn't always the case, especially with guys in the twilight of their career.
                  Certainly, there will be competition for his services.

                  2.) Like your draft picks but really think the Rams go for a corner EARLY- somewhere in rounds 2 or 3.
                  If we keep Trumaine, I'd say CB is a lower priority.

                  3.) I'm somewhat nervous with Mark Barron moving back to safety. It is my understanding that he just can't cover well enough to warrant being a starter. I get the bad feeling his best position is exactly how Fish/Williams used him last year and, alas, this will not be possible in a Wade Phillips defense. Hope I'm wrong but that's my take on this topic.
                  I think he can cover well enough to play SS.

                  4.) Don't know anything about Ejuan Price.....is he a good pass rusher and what do you see that he brings to the table?
                  Excellent pass rusher. 24.5 sacks and 42.5 TFL over last two years. Big knock on him is height (5'11). Reminds me of Elvis Dumervil. I think he'd thrive in Phillips' defense.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Of course, you knew that, HUb, and you're just being snarky.
                    If I were swimming in the ocean, I'd be a great white snark.

                    But seriously, folks...

                    I like what you're doing there, RFE. That would be deemed a successful off-season, IMO. Some follow up questions...

                    1. DeSean Jackson - McVay worked with Jackson, but also Garcon. Both are FAs and Garcon is a year younger. What do you think are the possibilities that we got A) both of them, or B) Garcon instead?

                    2. FB - I think there could be some value in bringing back the FB position for this lineup. I'd love to see a bruising old school FB in front of Gurley. Don't know if that's in McVay's plan or not, but what do you think?

                    3. LT/LG - A left side of Whitworth/Warford would be light-years ahead of Robinson/Saffold. Those are two of the top FA at their position, and it's just a short-term answer at LT, but......it would be a nice upgrade.

                    4. Front 7 - That's an exciting look. I love the idea of Donald/Brockers/Easley in Phillips' scheme. The big question....can Quinn regain his elite pass rusher status, while learning the new position?

                    5. Secondary - Not gonna lie....I'm nervous about that secondary. With McDonald and Alexander back there, we had a pair of SS at safety. Now, we've got a WLB and SS at safety. Not saying they can't do it, but it does pucker my butt-hole.
                    The more things change, the more they stay the same.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by HUbison View Post
                      1. DeSean Jackson - McVay worked with Jackson, but also Garcon. Both are FAs and Garcon is a year younger. What do you think are the possibilities that we got A) both of them, or B) Garcon instead?
                      Love the idea of getting both guys. If I had to choose one, though, I'd go with DJax due to his ability to stretch the field and open things up for others.

                      2. FB - I think there could be some value in bringing back the FB position for this lineup. I'd love to see a bruising old school FB in front of Gurley. Don't know if that's in McVay's plan or not, but what do you think?
                      I've always been a fan of the FB position. It just doesn't seem to en vogue these days. One guy to look at (Day 3 or undrafted FA) might be Freddie Stevenson from FSU.

                      3. LT/LG - A left side of Whitworth/Warford would be light-years ahead of Robinson/Saffold. Those are two of the top FA at their position, and it's just a short-term answer at LT, but......it would be a nice upgrade.
                      Yeah... it would probably mean shopping for a LT in the first round of the 2018 or 2019 draft, but I think Jared Goff would like having a vet watching his blind side while he develops.

                      4. Front 7 - That's an exciting look. I love the idea of Donald/Brockers/Easley in Phillips' scheme. The big question....can Quinn regain his elite pass rusher status, while learning the new position?
                      If he can get (and stay) healthy, I think Quinn would be an absolute beast as an edge rusher in a 3-4.

                      5. Secondary - Not gonna lie....I'm nervous about that secondary. With McDonald and Alexander back there, we had a pair of SS at safety. Now, we've got a WLB and SS at safety. Not saying they can't do it, but it does pucker my butt-hole.
                      Aye, there's the rub. I tried to stay somewhat realistic with these projections, so I had to fill those spots in-house. Moving Barron back to SS would be a risk, as I think he's proven to be a more effective player as a WLB. I'm just not sure what choice we have. I fear Barron's size would not work as a LB in a 3-4, and McDonald is a UFA. Hopefully, our pass rush would be so dominant that it would cover for this potentially square-peg solution.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I really like it, RFE! Me and you had some dialogue in the Draft and FA forum about guys to add, and we both very much liked the same guys. Here's my thoughts:

                        Desean Jackson: Explosive WR who can take the top off the D. Can play anywhere, is not restricted to going deep. He'd be a very good add, the only thing I'm worried about is what kind of dollar he demands. If it's in the 8MM per year range, I'd love to add him. If it's closer to 10MM and higher range, I'd look elsewhere.

                        Andrew Whitworth: I love Whitworth, just like you. He's an amazing LT and even though he's up there in age his play has not declined at all. I think a 2 year deal worth about 10MM per year is what he'll get, but from what I'm reading it sounds like the Bengals are doing everything they can to retain him and will likely let OG Kevin Zeitler walk. Whitworth would be an amazing add.

                        Larry Warford: I love Warford as an FA. Powerful, available, and well rounded Guard who's only 25. He'd be a great addition and I don't think he'd break the bank.

                        Kevin Minter: I actually listed Minter as a potential add weeks ago, and I would still be interested. He's a forgotten man in ARI and like you said they have plenty of guys to take care of basically ensuring he'll be gone. I think he will be relatively cheap as well, and he has spent his NFL career in a 3-4.

                        Me and you have been arguably the biggest proponents of bringing Tru back, but Easley would be VERY interesting as a re-signing. Personally, I don't think he fits the 3-4 well, but it's really interesting to think about having him on the DE spot in a 3-4. Talk about a penetrating DL...

                        I also don't think we'd be able to pull this off in regards to cap space. With these re-signings/additions I'd assume they'd come in somewhere around 40 million, and I don't know if we'll be able to spend all that with contracts up-coming (Ogletree, Donald, Joyner, etc).

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by mh-i View Post
                          I believe that the Rams offense would be less predictible and Gurley would be more productive if the Rams went back to a 2 running back set ala Robert Holcome and the Greatest Show On Turf.
                          Agreed, he has ALWAYS performed better when he had a true FB.

                          Comment

                          Related Topics

                          Collapse

                          • AvengerRam_old
                            Av's "Looking Wild" - Week 15
                            by AvengerRam_old
                            As the Niners have the NFC West well in hand, and the Cardinals are entirely irrelevant, I’m going to be “Looking Wild” rather than “Looking West” from here on out.

                            Hopefully, my picks this week will be more on target!

                            Predictions

                            Rams 24
                            Vikings 16
                            I think the offense will wake up a bit this week with some home cooking. The key to the game will be containing Adrian Peterson and forcing Christian Ponder to make plays. Without Percy Harvin on
                            ...
                            -12-11-2012, 09:01 AM
                          • AvengerRam_old
                            Av's "Looking Wild" - Week 15
                            by AvengerRam_old
                            As the Niners have the NFC West well in hand, and the Cardinals are entirely irrelevant, I’m going to be “Looking Wild” rather than “Looking West” from here on out.

                            Hopefully, my picks this week will be more on target!

                            Predictions

                            Rams 24
                            Vikings 16
                            I think the offense will wake up a bit this week with some home cooking. The key to the game will be containing Adrian Peterson and forcing Christian Ponder to make plays. Without Percy Harvin on the field, that is the Vikings’ weakness.

                            Bills 21
                            Seahawks 17
                            This could be a real trap game for the Hawks, who have beenon a roll. They are not a great road team to start, and the Bills defense should match up well to Seattle’s offense.

                            Redskins 19
                            Browns 14
                            With RGIII likely out, or at least limited, the Browns will keep this one close. In the end, though,I don’t think they have enough offense to win, even against the Skins’ suspect defense.

                            Packers 27
                            Bears 24
                            The Bears are desperate to get out of their current slump, but I don’t think they can protect Jay Cutler against the Packers’ pass rush. Also, their defense just isn’t playing at the level it did in September and October.

                            Steelers 24
                            Cowboys 13
                            The Steelers were embarrassed last week, and they need a win as much as the Cowboys do. This will be an example of the bad Tony Romo.

                            Saints 28
                            Buccaneers 20
                            New Orleans is nearly out of the playoff hunt, but I thinkthey will still be motivated to make a good showing at home against a division foe.

                            Falcons 31
                            Giants 27
                            Atlanta does not want to coast into the playoffs, and I expect they’ll win this home game. In doing so, the Giants will be back in the Wild Card picture as the fight the Redskins for the NFC East title.

                            Projected Standings

                            Seattle 8-6
                            Chicago 8-6
                            Washington 8-6*
                            New York 8-6*
                            St. Louis 7-6-1 (0.5)
                            Dallas 7-7 (1.0)
                            Minnesota (1.0)
                            Tampa Bay 6-8 (2.0)
                            New Orleans 6-8 (2.0)

                            *Tied for NFC East Division lead
                            -12-11-2012, 08:38 AM
                          • AvengerRam_old
                            Av's "Looking West" - Week 1
                            by AvengerRam_old
                            Can the Rams win the West in 2012?

                            Ultimately, this is the question that my “Looking West” feature will address each week. As the season progresses, the picture will become clearer.

                            But what about now, before opening day… can the Rams challenge?

                            Part of the difficulty in answering this question stems from the uncertainty surrounding the new Rams, who have a new coaching staff, and new starters at half the positions on the field.

                            But what about...
                            -09-07-2012, 01:46 PM
                          • AvengerRam_old
                            Av's Final 2013 Rams Draft Board and Weekend Watch List
                            by AvengerRam_old
                            The time has come for my final lists.

                            Here's my methodology:

                            1. On prior boards, I included several players who, though perhaps of interest to the Rams, have virtually no chance of making it to No. 16. As these players are largely irrelevant to my priority lists, I've taken them off the board.

                            2. I've divided my Top 20 Draft Board into three categories:

                            Group 1 consists of priority prospects for Pick #16. In other words, if any of these players are on the board, the Rams should take the highest ranked prospect and not consider (absent an absurdly lopsided offer) trading back.

                            Group 2 consists of priority prospects for Pick #22. In other words, if any of players from Groups 1 and 2 are on the board at #22, the Rams should take the highest ranked prospect and not consider (absent an absurdly lopsided offer) trading back.

                            Group 3 consists of players who I might take in Round 1, but would prefer not to take them without first attempting to trade back to acquire more picks.

                            3. I've extended the second list from 20 to 30 players and am now calling it a Weekend Watch List rather than a Day 2 Watch list, as it includes players I would consider beyond Round 3.

                            4. Players with an asterisk are those who have met with, or are scheduled to meet with, the Rams.

                            And with those explanations... here are my final lists:

                            Off the board: Luke Joekel, Eric Fisher, Lane Johnson, Dee Milliner,Xavier Rhodes, Sharif Floyd, Dion Jordan.

                            Rams Draft Board

                            1. Chance Warmack, OG, Alabama
                            2. Cordarrelle Patterson, WR, Tennessee*
                            3. Tavon Austin, WR, West Virginia*
                            4. D.J. Fluker, OT, Alabama*
                            5. Jonathan Cooper, OG, North Carolina
                            6. Matt Elam, S, Florida
                            7. Eric Reid, S, LSU
                            8. Justin Hunter, WR, Tennessee*
                            9. Terrance Williams, WR, Baylor*
                            10. DeAndre Hopkins, WR, Clemson
                            11. Alec Ogletree, LB, Georgia*
                            12. Kenny Vaccaro, S, Texas
                            13. Eddie Lacy, RB, Alabama*
                            14. Quinton Patton, WR, Louisiana Tech*
                            15. Sheldon Richardson, DT, Missouri
                            16. Keenan Allen, WR, California*
                            17. Kyle Long, OT/OT, Oregon*
                            18. Le’Veon Bell, RB,Michigan State
                            19. Khaseem Greene, OLB, Rutgers*
                            20. Jonathan Cyprien, S, FIU

                            Weekend Watch List

                            1. Larry Warford, OG, Kentucky*
                            2. Sio Moore, OLB, UConn*
                            3. Johnathan Franklin, RB, UCLA*
                            4. Terron Armstead,OT/OG, Arkansas-Pine Bluff*
                            5. Marcus Wheaton, WR, Oregon State
                            6. Jamie Collins, OLB, Southern Mississippi
                            7. Travis Frederick,OG/C, Wisconsin
                            8. Arthur Brown, OLB, Kansas State*
                            9. Mike Gillislee, RB, Florida*
                            10.Shamarko Thomas, S, Syracuse*
                            11. Gerald Hodges, OLB, Penn State*
                            12. Philip Thomas, S, Fresno State
                            13. David Amerson, DB, North Carolina State...
                            -04-09-2013, 09:46 AM
                          • AvengerRam_old
                            The Rams should offer Bruce more $
                            by AvengerRam_old
                            WHAT!?!?!?!


                            After all the debating and arguing that the offer made to Bruce was a good offer, now I'm saying the Rams should offer more?

                            Yes.

                            The reason should be obvious. With the increased cap number, the Rams have more to spend accross the board, and should be able to sweeten the deal a bit for Bruce.

                            I'm not saying they should break the bank, but maybe they could increase the offer to something like 3 years, 12 million ($6 million/$3 million/$3 million).

                            Wouldn't that make everyone happy?
                            -03-09-2006, 09:29 AM
                          Working...
                          X